Hybridisation of human resources management practices: the case of local government in France

Abstract

The dissemination of New Public Management principles is transforming human resources management practices in the public sector. The transformations that have taken place follow four logics: the logics of formalisation, contractualisation, individualisation and politicisation. The article examines the consequences of the interplay of these logics on the hybridisation of human resources management practices. To this end, two complementary methodologies were used: a quantitative methodology based on a survey of 223 local authorities within a French department; and a qualitative methodology based on interviews conducted with 25 of these authorities. The results show that these logics coexist, raising questions about the micro-negotiations that allow this coexistence.

Points for practitioners

Human resources management practices in public organisations are the composite outcome of a set of different, even contradictory, logics: the logics of individualisation, contractualisation, formalisation and politicisation. There is no common shift towards a single new human resources management model within French local authorities. The fact that these logics are always present in different combinations is explained mainly by the internal dynamics between the stakeholders (elected officials, human resources professionals, management, etc.).

Keywords

human resources management hybridisation politicisation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

JL (

1970) Quand Dire, C’est Faire, How to Do Things with Words. Seuil.

Battilana

Dorado

S (

2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1419–1440.

Biland

(2009) Moderniser les ressources humaines dans une petite ville française: Appropriations et contournements des normes juridiques et gestionnaires. Pyramides 17: 15–34.

Biland

(2010) Les ambiguïtés de la sélection par concours dans la fonction publique territoriale: Une institutionnalisation inachevée. Sociologie Du Travail 52: 172–194.

Biland

E (

2012) La Fonction Publique Territoriale. Repère: La Découverte.

Bishop

Waring

J (

2016) Becoming hybrid: The negotiated order on the front line of public–private partnerships. Human Relations 69(10): 1937–1958.

Bourdon

J (

1974) Le Personnel Communal. Paris: Berger Levrault.

Caciagli

Jun’ichi

K (

2001) Heurs et malheurs du clientélisme. Revue Française de Science Politique 51(4): 569–586.

Cameron

R (

2010) La redéfinition des relations politico-administratives en Afrique du Sud. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives 76(4): 709–734.

10.

Chevallier

J (

2002) Science Administrative. Paris: PUF.

11.

Condrey

Battaglio

(2007) A return to spoils? Revisiting radical civil service reform in the United States. Public Administration Review 67(3): 425–436.

12.

Crozet

Desmarais

C (

2004) Les habits neufs de la gestion des ressources humaines dans les villes depuis les lois de décentralisation: Vers une troisième voie? Revue Politiques et Management Public 22(2): 55–74.

13.

De Kok

Uhlaner

(2001) Organization context and human resource management in the small firm. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. Available at: http://www.tinbergen.nl

14.

Demmke

Moilanen

(2010) Civil Service in the EU of 27: Reform Outcomes and the Future of the Civil Service. Berlin: Peter Lang.

15.

Desmarais

(2008) The French research community’s perspectives on New Public Human Resource Management. Public Management Review 10(1): 139–150.

16.

Desmarais

Frank

(2017) La politisation ordinaire: Analyse de l’impact du contexte public sur les activités managériales. 6ème congrès d’AIRMAP, Nice, 1–2 June.

17.

Desmarais

Giauque

(2016) Politique publique et management public, de nouvelles frontières? Gestion et Management Public 4(2): 1–7.

18.

Dion

(1986) La Politisation des Mairies. Paris: Economica, Politique comparée.

19.

Dreyfus

F (

2000) L’invention de la bureaucratie: Servir l’Etat en France, en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (XVIIIe–XXe) siècle. Paris: Découverte.

20.

Emery

Giauque

(2014) L’univers hybride de l’administration au XXIème siècle. Revue Internationale de Sciences Administratives 80: 25–34.

21.

Hood

(1996) Public management. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

22.

Hood

(2001) Public service bargains and public service reform. In: Peters

Pierre

(eds) Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge, ch. 2.

23.

Johnson-Laird

(1994) Mental models and probabilistic thinking. Cognition 50(1–3): 189–209.

24.

Kim

Gao

(2010) An empirical study of human resource management practices in family firms in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21(12): 2095–2119.

25.

Le Saout

(2011) La mobilité des directeurs généraux des services municipaux comme indicateur d’un rapport renouvelé au travail politique. Congrès AFSP, Strasbourg.

26.

Moscarola

(2018) Faire Parler les Données. Paris: Edition EMS.

27.

Norman

(2001) Letting and making managers manage: The effect of control systems on management action in New Zealand’s central government. International Public Management Journal 4(1): 65–68.

28.

Pichault

Nizet

(2013) Pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines. Conventions, contextes et jeux d’acteurs.Paris, Editions du Seuil.

29.

Peters BG and Pierre J (eds) (2004) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.

30.

Pierre

(ed.) (1995) Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

31.

Pierre

(2004) Politicisation of the Swedish civil service: A necessary evil or just evil. In: Peters

Pierre

(eds) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 41–54.

32.

Pollitt

(1993) Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s? Cambridge: Blackwell Business.

33.

Pollitt

Bouckaert

(2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Powell

DiMaggio

(eds) (2012) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Rouban L (1998) Les transformations de l’action publique. Revue Française d’Administration Publique 86: 157–165.

36.

Sadran P (1987) De l’allégeance à la mobilité: Quelle politisation pour la fonction publique territoriale? Pouvoirs (40): 39–48.

37.

Shim

D-S

(2001) Recent human resources development in OECD member countries. Public Personnel Management 30: 3.

38.

Skelcher

Smith

(2015) Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration 93(2): 433–448.

39.

Thiétart

R-A

(2014) Méthode de recherche en management (4th edn). Paris: Dunod, p. 656.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB