Big data have become a game-changer for modern public administration in those areas in which they are used. Although their application is still limited in the public sector, their use develops dynamically in areas where they bring tangible results in terms of efficiency and efficacy. This article presents the concept of big data, outlines the possibilities for using big data in the public sector and methods of their utilization, highlights cases where these have been implemented, along with the results. This article discusses applications of big data methods in public policy design and implementation and in public authority internal management. It includes a summary of the benefits, disadvantages and challenges related to utilization of big data. The article also briefly addresses historical, current and predictive approaches. Research was carried out using internet-based case analysis and is limited by the confidentiality of details relating to big data methods. Although the research has had to be limited to publicly available descriptions, the findings make it possible to understand the big data phenomenon in public administration and to draw general lessons from their use.
Points for practitioners
Big data is a contemporary phenomenon. Properly utilized it brings astonishingly positive outcomes for public administration in terms of its efficacy, efficiency, and overall client satisfaction. These benefits are a result of significant increase in the accuracy of decision-making, a significant acceleration of performance of internal the ‘information task’ and a significant reduction in operating costs related to the decision-making process. This is possible thanks to the digitization of human life and IT developments applied in a specific way for public administration – the way of big data methods where huge amounts of data are processed in a form of reasoning by powerful IT technology to present information that helps public administration to better perform its task.
Australian Government Information Management Office (2013) The Australian Public Services Big Data Strategy, Canberra: Australian Government Information Management Office, pp. 1–27.
2.
BarocasSSelbstAD (2015) Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review. 104, 2016, Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2477899 (accessed 10 September 2015).
CrawfordKSchultzJ (2014) Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review55(1): 93–128. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2325784 (accessed 10 September 2015).
Fazekas M and Tóth IJ (2014) New ways to measure institutionalised grand corruption in public procurement. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2519385 (accessed 10 September 2015).
IBM (2012) IBM helps North Carolina fight Medicaid fraud. Available at: http://youtu.be/Yqf9FBGZfbw (accessed 10 September 2015).
15.
IBM (2014) LTA, SMRT, StarHub and IBM collaborate to improve transport with data for Singapore commuters. Available at: www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/44058.wss (accessed 10 September 2015).
KitchinR (2013) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. SSRN Electronic Journal. . Available at: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2289141 (accessed 10 September 2015).
LaneyD (2001) 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety. Application Delivery Strategies949. (February): 4.
25.
ManyikaJChuiMBrownBBughinJDobbsRRoxburghC (2011) Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. (June): 156. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/01443610903114527 (accessed 10 September 2015).
OliveiraDde Souza BermejoPdos SantosP (2014) Sentiment analysis, social media, and public administration. In: DolicaninCKajanERandjelovicDStojanovicB (eds) Handbook of Research on Democratic Strategies and Citizen-centred E-government Services, Hershey, PAIGI Global, 231–251. Available at: www.igi-global.com/chapter/sentiment-analysis-social-media-and-public-administration/121323 (accessed 10 September 2015).
29.
O’MalleyM (2014) Doing what works: Governing in the age of big data. Public Administration Review74(5): 555–556.
30.
PiovanoLGarridoDSilvaR (2014) What (smart) data visualizations can offer to smart city science. Digiworld Economic Journal96: 89–112.
RappGCAndersonHA (2013) Intelligence design: Using, an analysis of the SEC’s New Office of Market Intelligence and its goal of enforcement. University of Cincinnati Law Review82(2): 415–437.
RubinsteinIS (2013) Big data: The end of privacy or a new beginning?International Data Privacy Law3(2): 74–87. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips036 (accessed 10 September 2015).
Sadowski J and Pasquale F (2015) The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 26, 1–22.
38.
TownsendAM (2013) Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
39.
UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2013) Seizing the Data Opportunity: A Strategy for UK Data Capability, London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
40.
US Executive Office of the President (2014) Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values (May), Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
