Influencing public sector performance: studying the impact of ability-,motivation- and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on various performance outcomes in the public sector

Abstract

Background

In response to recent calls in the literature to decompose both the human resources system and performance, this study has examined the effects of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on the effectiveness, efficiency and fairness of public organizations, with job satisfaction considered as a mediating variable.

Aim

Insights from Human Resource Management and performance research, mostly conducted in the private sector, have been combined with public management literature in order to gain insight into the Human Resource Management–performance relationship in the public sector.

Method

Regression analysis with a bootstrapping method was used to test the mediating effects.

Results

The analysis showed that the three human resources components heterogeneously impact upon the three performance outcomes. Further, the results showed that ability-enhancing and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices are more strongly related to performance outcomes than motivation-enhancing human resources practices.

Conclusion

Decomposing Human Resource Management and performance provides greater insight into the Human Resource Management–performance relationship.

Points for practitioners

The results show that investing in Human Resource Management positively influences performance outcomes. Moreover, our results show that various aspects of public performance require different human resources approaches. Investing in ability-enhancing human resources practices seems to be particularly relevant if one wants to enhance effectiveness. All the human resources practices, but especially ability-enhancing ones, are relevant to enhancing efficiency. However, investing in motivation-enhancing human resources practices seems to make little sense if one is seeking to enhance fairness.

Keywords

ability-motivation- and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices Human Resource Management job satisfaction multidimensional perspective on performance organizational performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Gerbing

(1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411–423.

Andrews

Boyne

Walker

(2006) Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In: Boyne

Meier

O’Toole

et al. (eds) Public Service Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bagozzi

Philips

(1982) Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construct. Administrative Science Quarterly 27(3): 459–489.

Baron RM and Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173–1182.

Boselie

(2010) High performance work practices in the health care sector: A Dutch case study. International Journal of Manpower 31(1): 42–58.

Boselie

Paauwe

Richardson

(2003) HRM, institutionalization and organizational performance: A comparison of hospitals, hotels and local governments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14(8): 1407–1429.

Boselie

Dietz

Boon

(2005) Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal 15(3): 67–94.

Boxall

Macky

(2009) Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal 19(1): 3–23.

Boxall

Purcell

(2011) Strategy and HRM, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Boyne

Jenkins

Poole

(1999) HRM in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. Public Administration 77(2): 407–420.

11.

Brewer

(2005) In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 505–527.

12.

Brewer

Selden

(2000) Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(4): 685–711.

13.

Byrne

(2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.

Combs

Liu

Hall

et al. (2006) How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology 59(3): 501–528.

15.

Dyer

Reeves

(1995) HR strategies and firm performance: What do we know, where do we need to go? The International Journal of Human Resource Management 6(3): 657–667.

16.

Field

(2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, London: Sage.

17.

Frederickson

(1990) Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review 50(2): 228–237.

18.

Guest

(2002) HRM, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker into HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations 44(3): 335–358.

19.

Guest

(2011) HRM and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal 21(1): 3–13.

20.

Guest

Conway

Dewe

(2004) Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices. Human Resource Management Journal 14(1): 79–96.

21.

Hayes

(2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs 76(4): 408–420.

22.

Bentler

(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1–55.

23.

Huselid

(1995) The impact of HRM practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 38(3): 635–672.

24.

Jiang

Lepak

et al. (2012) How does HRM influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 55(6): 1264–1294.

25.

Judge

Thoresen

Bono

et al. (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 127(3): 376–407.

26.

Kim

(2005) Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(2): 245–261.

27.

Lepak

Liao

Chung

et al. (2006) A conceptual review of HRM systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 25: 217–272.

28.

Nagy

(2002) Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75(1): 77–86.

29.

Nishii

Wright

(2008) Variability Within Organizations. Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management, New York and Sussex: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 225–248.

30.

Paauwe

(2004) HRM and Performance: Achieving Long-term Viability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Paauwe

Guest

Wright

(2013) HRM and Performance: Achievements and Challenges, UK: Wiley Press.

32.

Perry

Mesch

Paarlberg

(2006) Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review 66(4): 505–514.

33.

Podsakoff

MacKenzie

Lee

et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.

34.

Poutvaara

Wagener

(2008) Why is the public sector more labor-intensive? A distortionary tax argument. Journal of Economics 94(2): 105–124.

35.

Rainey

(2003) Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Schneider

Hanges

Smith

et al. (2003) Which comes first: Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 836–851.

37.

Steijn

Leisink

(2006) Organizational commitment among Dutch public sector employees. International Review of Administrative Sciences 72(2): 187–201.

38.

Svara

Brunet

(2004) Filling in the skeletal pillar: Addressing social equity in introductory courses in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education 10: 99–109.

39.

Taris

Schreurs

PJG

(2009) Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy–productive worker hypothesis. Work & Stress 23(2): 120–136.

40.

Van Dooren

De Caluwe

Lonti

(2012) How to measure public administration performance. A conceptual model with applications for budgeting, HRM, and open government. Public Performance & Management Review 35(3): 489–508.

41.

Van Jaarsveld

Walker

Skarlicki

(2010) The role of job demands and emotional exhaustion in the relationship between customer and employee incivility. Journal of Management 36(6): 1486–1504.

42.

Vermeeren

(2014) HRM Implementation and Performance in the Public Sector, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam.