On the global stage, public management has grown up over the past 30 years as a topic dominated by the ‘Anglosphere’. Now there are reasons to believe that this era is ending. There are three main reasons for this. First, the dominance of Anglosphere ideas and practices was never as complete as it may sometimes have appeared. Second, the effectiveness of typical Anglosphere reforms has been problematic. Recent scholarship indicates that only a modest proportion of such reforms can show evidence of substantial success. Third, other regions of the world are becoming economically and politically more influential and self-confident, and, in some cases, they also have long administrative traditions of their own. Far from being a reason for dismay, this opening-up offers an opportunity for difficult, but potentially very rewarding debates that will need to run across different cultures and administrative traditions.
AndrewsM (2013) The Limits of Institutional Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BartoliA (2008) The study of public management in France: la spécificité du modèle français d’administration. In: KickertW (eds) The Study of Public Management in Europe and the US: A Comparative Analysis of National Distinctiveness, Abingdon and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 14–41.
3.
BermanESabharwalMWangC-YWestJJingYJanC-YBrillantesAChenC-AGomesR (2013) The impact of societal culture on the use of performance strategies in East Asia. Public Management Review15(8): 1065–1089.
4.
BorwornwathanaB (2004) Putting New Public Management to good use: Autonomous public organizations in Thailand. In: PollittCTalbotC (eds) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 247–263.
5.
BrownTGongTJingY (2012) Collaborative governance in mainland China and Hong Kong: Introductory essay. International Public Management Journal15(4): 393–404.
6.
BurtonM (2013) The Politics of Public Sector Reform: From Thatcher to the Coalition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CandlerG (2002) Particularism versus universalism in the Brazilian public administration literature. Public Administration Review62(3): 298–306.
8.
CaulfieldJ (2004) New Public Management in a developing country: Creating executive agencies in Tanzania. In: PollittCTalbotC (eds) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 229–246.
9.
CheungA (2012) Public administration in East Asia: Legacies, trajectories and lessons. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(2): 209–216.
10.
ChristensenTLægreidP (2001) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practices, Aldershot: Ashgate.
11.
ChristensenTLishengDPainterM (2008) Ádministrative reform in China’s central government: How much ‘learning for the West?’. International Review of Administrative Sciences74(3): 351–371.
12.
CohenB (2014) Advanced Introduction to International Political Economy, Cheltenham/Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
13.
Deloitte/Reform (2013) The State of the State 2013: In Search of Affordable Government. (http://www.deloitte.com; accessed 27 January 2014).
14.
DerlienH-U (1998) From Administrative Reform to Administrative Modernization, Bamberg: Verwaltungwissenschaftliche Beitrage 33.
15.
DolowitzDMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance13(1): 5–24.
16.
DreschlerWThree paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic. Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics No. 50. 2013Norway: The Other Canon Foundation.
17.
DrewryG (2014) The administrative sciences, from the past to the future (by a roundabout route). International Review of Administrative Sciences80(1): 3–11.
18.
DunleavyPCarreraL (2013) Growing the Productivity of Government Services, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19.
FukuyamaF (2004) State Building: Governance and the World Order in the Twenty-first Century, London: Profile Books.
20.
GambleA (2009) The Spectre at the Feast: Capitalist Crisis and the Politics of Recession, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
Government Accounting Office (2006) Military operations: High-level DoD action needed to address long-standing problems with management and oversight of contractors supporting deployed forces. Report to Congressional Committees, Washington, DC, Government Accounting Office, December.
23.
GuyomarchA (1999) ‘Public service’, ‘public management’ and the modernization of French public administration. Public Administration77(1): 171–193.
24.
HondeghemADepréR (2005) De Copernicushervorming in perspectief: Veranderingsmanagement in de federale overhead, Brugge: Vanden Broele.
25.
HoodCDixonR (2013) A model of cost-cutting in government? The great management revolution in UK central government reconsidered. Public Administration91(1): 114–134.
26.
HoodCLodgeM (2006) The Politics of Public Service Bargains, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HughesO (2003) Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
JannW (2003) State administration and governance in Germany: Competing traditions and dominant narratives. Public Administration81(1): 95–118.
29.
KettlD (2005) The Global Public Management Revolution, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
KiggunduM (2012) Anti-poverty and progressive social chnage in Brazil: Lessons for other emerging economies. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(4): 733–756.
31.
KPMG (2013a) Walking the Fiscal Tightrope: A Framework for Fiscal Sustainability in Government. KPMG International (kpmg.com/government; accessed 4 January 2014).
32.
KPMG (2013b) Future State 2030: The Global Megatrends Shaping Government. KPMG International (kpmg.com/government; accessed 4 January 2014).
33.
LightP (1997) The Tides of Reform: Making Government Work 1945–1995, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
LynnLJnr (2006) Public Management: Old and New, London: Routledge.
35.
LynnLJnr (2008) The study of public management in the United States: Management in the New World and a reflection on Europe. In: KickertW (eds) The Study of Public Management in Europe and the US: A Comparative Analysis of National Distinctiveness, Abingdon and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 233–262.
36.
ManningN (2001) The legacy of the New Public Management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences67: 297–312.
37.
MoynihanD (2008) The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
NakamuraA (2012) Asian model of government re-examined in the aftermath of the global economic crunch: A Japanese perspective from the experience of triple disasters in March 2011. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(2): 239–259.
39.
National Audit Office (2006) Central government’s use of consultants, HC128, Session 2006–7, London: The Stationary Office.
40.
OECD (1995) Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
41.
OngaroE (2010) Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
42.
OsborneDGaeblerT (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
ParkSMParkHJRyuEU (2013) Determinants of positive job attitude and behaviour in the Asian work context: Evidence from Korean central government agencies. Public Management Review15(8): 1154–1184.
44.
PawsonR (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto, Los Angeles, CA and London: Sage.
45.
PetersGB (2010) Public administration in the United States: Anglo-American, just American or which American? In: PainterMPetersGB (eds) Tradition and Public Administration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 114–128.
46.
PollittC (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
47.
PollittC (2004) Castles built on sand? Agencies in Latvia. In: PollittCTalbotC (eds) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 283–296.
48.
PollittC (2007) Convergence or divergence: What has been happening in Europe? In: PollittCVan ThielSHomburgV (eds) New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 10–25.
49.
PollittC (2009) Pathologies on the neo-liberal state: From bureaucracy to fragmentocracy. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift25(2): 160–184.
50.
PollittC (2013a) Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
51.
PollittC (2013b) 40 years of public management reform in UK central government: Promises, promises?Policy and Politics41(4): 465–480.
52.
PollittCBouckaertG (2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
PollittCDanS (2013) Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform: A review of the European literature. Public Performance and Management Review37(1): 7–32.
54.
PremforsR (1998) Re-shaping the democratic state: Swedish experiences in a comparative perspective. Public Administration76(1): 141–159.
55.
PwC (2013) Future of Government. PwC (www.psrc.pwc.com; accessed 16 January 2014).
56.
Public Administration Review (2010) Looking into the future of public administration: New approaches and tools for a changing governance landscape. Supplement to Volume 70.
57.
RadinB (2006) Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity and Democratic Values, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
58.
RovikK (2002) The secrets of the winners: Management ideas that flow. In: Sahlin-AnderssonKEngwallL (eds) The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows and Sources, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 113–144.
59.
Sahlin-AnderssonKEngwallL (2002) The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows and Sources, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
Saint MartinD (2000) Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
Saint MartinD (2005) Management consultancy. In: FerlieELynnLJnrPollittC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 671–694.
62.
ScahillJ (2007) Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, London: Serpent’s Tail.
63.
SoBWY (2014) Civic engagement in the performance evaluation of the public sector in China. Public Management Review16(3): 341–357.
64.
Treasury Select Committee (2011) The Private Finance Initiative.
65.
TsoukasH (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
VerhoestKVan ThielSBouckaertGLægreidP (2012) Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
WestneyD (1987) Imitation and Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
WilksS (2013) The Political Power of the Business Corporation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
69.
World Bank (2012) Approach to Public Sector Management 2011–2020: Better Results from Public Sector Institutions, Washington, DC: World Bank.
70.
YamamotoK (2004) Agencification in Japan: Renaming or revolution? In: PollittCTalbotC (eds) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 215–226.
