Given the complex decision-making that goes into policy choices for regulatory regimes, it would seem intuitive that such regimes might develop under distinct national styles. By revisiting several historical models of regulatory development, including Bernstein's classic life-cycle model, and then by analyzing six case studies from the US and UK, for example, we explore the possibility that regulatory regimes vary more prominently along the temporal dimension rather than along spatial ones. We conclude that regulatory regimes have similar developmental patterns, although the time spent at each stage in the process can vary significantly according to unique domestic factors.
Points for practitioners
Existing theories of regulation would suggest that regulatory activity should either follow identical development trajectories in different countries or it should be entirely idiosyncratic in every jurisdiction in which it is used. Clearly neither is true, as some regulatory regimes display similar qualities and development patterns, while others appear to be unique. A comparison of regulatory activities in the US and UK reveals that regulatory regimes in these countries develop through similar stages along similar pathways, but that the rate of development and the transition through the stages can occur at different speeds. This development is mainly stimulated by periodic crises that force changes in regulation.
BaldwinRHoodCRothsteinH (2000) Assessing the Dangerous Dogs Act: When does a regulatory law fail?Public Law. (Summer 2000): 282–305.
2.
BaxterPJ (1986) From Flixborough to Bhopal: Is legislation enough?British Journal of Industrial Medicine43(1): 1–5.
3.
BeckMWoolfsonC (2000) The regulation of health and safety in Britain: From old Labour to New Labour. Industrial Relations Journal31(1): 35–49.
4.
BergSVMemonANSkeltonR (2000) Designing an Independent Regulatory Commission. Public Utility Research Center Working Paper. University of Florida, Warrington College of Business, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
5.
BernauerT (2003) Genes, Trade and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BernsteinMH (1955) Regulating Business by Independent Commission, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BirklandTA (2006) Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8.
BoinA’t HartP (2003) Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible?Public Administration Review63(5): 544–553.
9.
BollhoffD (2002) The new regulatory regime: The institutional design of telecommunications regulation at the national level. In: HeritierA (ed) Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 235–261.
10.
BorrazO (2007a) Risk as public problems. Journal of Risk Research10(7): 941–957.
11.
BorrazO (2007b) Governing standards: The rise of standardization processes in France and in the EU. Governance20(1): 57–84.
BulmerS (2009) Politics in time meets the politics of time: Historical institutionalism and the EU timescape. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 307–324.
14.
CarpenterD (2004) Protection without capture: Product approval by a politically responsive, learning regulator. American Political Science Review98(4): 613–631.
15.
CarpenterD (2010) Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA, 1st edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ChirinkoRSHarperEPJr (1993) Buckle up or slow down? New estimates of offsetting behavior and their implications for automobile safety regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12(2): 270–296.
17.
ClaybrookJBollierD (1985) The hidden benefits of regulation: Disclosing the auto safety payoff. Yale Journal on Regulation3(1): 87–131. .
18.
CortellAPPetersonS (1999) Altered states: Domestic institutional change. British Journal of Political Science29(1): 177–203.
19.
DaugbjergC (1997) Policy networks and agricultural policy reforms: Explaining deregulation in Sweden and re-regulation in the European community. Governance10(2): 123–142.
20.
deLeonPJMayVWildavskyAB (1978) A theory of policy termination. In: MayVWildavskyAB (eds) The Policy Cycle, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 279–300.
21.
DerthickMQuirkPJ (1985) The Politics of Deregulation, Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
22.
DobbMH (1973) Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
EisnerMA (1994) Discovering patterns in regulatory history: Continuity, change and regulatory regimes. Journal of Policy History6(2): 157–187.
24.
FreemanGP (1985) National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy5(4): 467–496.
25.
GerodimosR (2004) The UK BSE crisis as a failure of government. Public Administration82(4): 911–929.
26.
GoetzKHMeyer-SahlingJH (2009) Political time in the EU: Dimensions, perspectives, theories. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 180–201.
27.
GrahamHD (1993) The stunted career of policy history: A critique and an agenda. The Public Historian15(2): 15–37.
28.
GrahamJD (1984) Technology, behavior, and safety: An empirical study of automobile occupant-protection regulation. Policy Sciences17(2): 141–151. .
29.
HenstraD (2011) The dynamics of policy change: A longitudinal analysis of emergency management in Ontario, 1950–2010. The Journal of Policy History23(3): 399–428.
30.
HoodCRothsteinH (2001) Risk regulation under pressure: Problem solving or blame shifting?Administration & Society33(1): 21–53.
31.
HowellsRWL (1972) The Robens Report. Industrial Law Journal1(1): 185–196.
32.
HowlettM (2009) Process sequencing policy dynamics: Beyond homeostasis and path dependency. Journal of Public Policy29(3): 241–262.
33.
HowlettM (2011) Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments, New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Howlett M (2012) The Lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review 33(5): 539–555.
35.
HowlettMMigoneA (2012) Regulatory life cycles and comparative biotechnology regulation: Analyzing regulatory regimes in space and time. In: HowlettMLaycockD (eds) Regulating Next Generation Agri-food Biotechnologies Lessons from European, North American and Asian Experiences, London: Routledge.
36.
HowlettMRaynerJ (2006) Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences39(1): 1–18.
37.
IrwinASmithDGriffithR (1982) Risk analysis and public policy for major hazards. Physics in Technology13(6): 258–265.
38.
JamesPWaltersD (2002) Worker representation in health and safety: Options for regulatory reform. Industrial Relations Journal33(2): 141–156.
39.
JasanoffS (1990) American exceptionalism and the political acknowledgment of risk. Daedalus119(4): 61–81.
40.
JordanaJLevi-FaurD (2004) The politics of regulation in the age of governance. In: JordanaJLevi-FaurD (eds) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, London: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–28.
41.
KaganRA (1991) Adversarial legalism and American government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management10(3): 369–406.
42.
KaganRA (2001) Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
KahnAE (1970) The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions – Vol 1: Economic Principles, New York, NY: John Wiley.
44.
KeelerJTS (1993) Opening the window for reform: Mandates, crises and extraordinary policymaking. Comparative Political Studies25(4): 433–486.
45.
KellerM (1981) The pluralist state: American economic regulation in comparative perspective, 1900–1930. In: McGrawTK (ed) Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 56–94.
46.
KinchyAJKleinmanDLAutryR (2008) Against free markets, against science? Regulating the socio-economic effects of biotechnology. Rural Sociology73(2): 147–179.
47.
KingdonJ (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
48.
KnillC (1998) European policies: The impact of national administrative traditions. Journal of Public Policy18(1): 1–28.
49.
KrasnerSD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization36(2): 185–205.
50.
KrasnerSD (1984) Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics16(2): 223–244.
51.
KrebsJ (2004) Establishing a single, independent food standards agency: The United Kingdom's experience. Food and Drug Law Journal59(3): 387–397.
52.
LangTBarlingDCaraherM (2001) Food, social policy and the environment: Towards a new model. Social Policy and Administration35(5): 538–558.
53.
LeeMT (1998) The Ford Pinto case and the development of auto safety regulations, 1893–1978. Business and Economic History27(2): 390–401.
54.
LeissW (2001) In the Chamber of Risks: Understanding Risk Controversies, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
55.
LeonardiPM (2010) From road to lab to math: The co-evolution of technological, regulatory, and organizational innovations for automotive crash testing. Social Studies of Science40(2): 243–274.
56.
LewisDE (2002) The politics of agency termination: Confronting the myth of agency immortality. The Journal of Politics64(1): 89–107.
57.
LodgeM (2001) Barking mad? Risk regulation and the control of dangerous dogs in Germany. German Politics10(3): 65–82.
58.
LodgeM (2011) Risk, regulation and crisis: Comparing national responses in food safety regulation. Journal of Public Policy31(1): 25–50.
59.
LodgeMHoodC (2002) Pavlovian policy responses to media feeding frenzies? Dangerous dogs regulation in comparative perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management10(1): 1–13.
60.
McHughenASmythS (2008) US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnology Journal6(1): 2–12. .
61.
MajoneG (1997) From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy17(2): 139–167.
62.
MajoneG (2010) Foundations of risk regulation: Science, decision-making, policy learning and institutional reform. European Journal of Risk Regulation1(1): 5–19.
63.
MardenE (2003) Risk and regulation: US regulatory policy on genetically modified food and agriculture. Boston College Law Review44(3): 733–787. .
64.
MillstoneEvan ZwanenbergP (2002) The evolution of food safety policy-making institutions in the UK, EU and codex alimentarius. Social Policy and Administration36(6): 593–609.
65.
MurphyJDavidowL (2006) Governing the Transatlantic Conflict over Agricultural Biotechnology. Contending Coalitions, Trade Liberalisation and Standard Setting, London: Routledge.
66.
OtwayHRavetzJ (1984) On the regulation of technology: Examining the linear model. Futures16(3): 217–232.
67.
PeltzmanS (1975) The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy83(4): 677–725.
68.
PiersonP (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
PollittC (2008) Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
PosnerRA (1974) Theories of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science5(2): 335–358.
71.
ReaganMD (1987) Regulation: The Politics of Policy, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
72.
SadeeCSamuelsDEO'BrienTP (1977) The characteristics of the explosion of cyclohexane at the Nypro (UK) Flixborough plant on 1st June 1974. Journal of Occupational Accidents1(3): 203–235. .
73.
SalamonL (2002) Economic regulation. In: SalamonL (ed) The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–155.
74.
SchwartzVEGoldbergP (2005) A prescription for drug liability and regulation. Oklahoma Law Review58(2): 135–178.
ShapiroSA (1990) Biotechnology and the design of regulation. Ecology Law Quarterly17(1): 1–70. .
77.
StiglerGJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science3(1): 3–18.
78.
StiglerGJ (1975) The Citizen and the State: Essays on Regulation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
SunsteinC (1991) Administrative substance. Duke Law Journal1991(3): 607–646.
80.
TeminP (1979) The origin of compulsory drug prescriptions. Journal of Law and Economics22(1): 91–105.
81.
TeminP (1985) Government actions in times of crisis: Lessons from the history of drug regulation. Journal of Social History18(3): 433–438.
82.
TholoniatL (2009) The temporal constitution of the European Commission: A timely investigation. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 221–238.
83.
WuI (2008) Who regulates phones, television, and the internet? What makes a communications regulator independent and why it matters. Perspectives on Politics6(4): 769–783.
