The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship between managers and their subordinates. The framework of social exchange theory was used in order to examine whether subordinates demonstrate effort at work and remain in exchange of support by their manager. Using a sample of employees (N = 704) working for a provincial government in Canada, the results indicate that perceived supervisor support, trust in the supervisor reduce the likelihood that a public sector employee will leave their job or procrastinate at work, through commitment to their supervisor. The results are discussed in the light of public management research.
Points for practitioners
The ability of managers to create a healthy work environment based on the capacity to recognize the efforts of their subordinates requires the professionalization of the role by providing managers with greater autonomy to manage the resources at their disposal.
AlbrechtS (2006) Predictors of employee extra-role performance and turnover intentions in the public sector: An integrated model. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management6(2–4): 263–278.
2.
AlbrechtSLTravaglioneA (2003) Trust in public sector senior management. International Journal of Human Resource Management14(1): 76–92.
3.
AmabileTMSchatzelEAMonetaGBKramerSJ (2006) Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly17(6): 679–680.
4.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103: 411–423.
5.
AndrewsMCKacmarKMBlakelyGLBlucklewNS (2008) Group cohesion as an enhancement to the justice-affective commitment relationship. Group & Organization Management33: 736–755.
6.
ArbuckleK (2009) Amos 5.0. Update to the Amos User’s Guide, Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
7.
ArnaboldiMAzzoneGPalermoT (2010) Managerial innovations in central government: Not wrong, but hard to explain. International Journal of Public Sector Management23(1): 78–93.
8.
BagraimJJHimeP (2007) The dimensionality of workplace interpersonal trust and its relationship to workplace affective commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology33(3): 43–48.
9.
BeckerT (1992) Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?Academy of Management Journal1: 232–244.
10.
BennisWGNanusB (1985) Leaders: The Strategy for Taking Charge, New York: Harper & Row.
11.
BentlerPMBonnettDC (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin80: 588–606.
12.
BlauP (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13.
BoyneGPooleMJenkinsG (1999) Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. Public Administration77(2): 407–420.
14.
BrowerHHSchoormanFDTanHH (2000) A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader–member exchange. Leadership Quarterly11(2): 227–250.
15.
BrowneRCudeckMW (1992) Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value. Psychometrika57(3): 357–369.
16.
BrunettoYFarr-WhartonRShacklockK (2010) The impact of supervisor–subordinate relationships on morale: Implications for public and private sector nurses’ commitment. Human Resource Management Journal20(2): 206–225.
17.
ButlerJK (1991) Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management17: 643–663.
18.
CabreraACollinsWCSalgadoJ (2006) Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management2: 245–264.
19.
ChoYJPerryJL (in press) Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes: Role of managerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration. First published on 2 November 2011 as doi:10.1177/0734371X11421495.
20.
ColeMSSchaningerWSHarrisSG (2002) The workplace social exchange network: A multi-level conceptual examination. Group and Organization Management27: 142–168.
21.
CookJWallT (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53(1): 39–52.
22.
Coyle-ShapiroJKesslerI (2002) Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: Contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration80(1): 77–101.
23.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
24.
DemerssJGowI (2002) Human resource management and new public management: Opinions of federal and Quebecer managers (in French: Gestion des ressources humaines et nouveau management public: opinions de gestionnaires fédéraux et québécois). Canadian Public Administration45(4): 512–537.
25.
DesmaraisC (2008) The French research community’s perspectives on new public human resource management. Public Management Review10(1): 139–150.
26.
DirksKTFerrinDL (2002) Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology87: 611–628.
27.
EderPEisenbergerR (2008) Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management34(1): 55–68.
28.
EisenbergerRHuntingtonRHuntingtonSSowaD (1986) Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology3: 500–507.
29.
EisenbergerRStinglhamberFVandenbergheCSucharskiILRhoadesL (2002) Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology87: 565–573.
30.
FerrariJREmmonsRA (1994) Procrastination as revenge: Do people report using delays as a strategy for vengeance?Personality and Individual Differences17(4): 539–544.
31.
FerrariJRJohnsonJLMcCownWG (1995) Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research and Treatment, New York: Plenum Press.
32.
FornellCLarckerD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
33.
FurnhamATaylorJ (2004) The Darker Side of Behaviour at Work: Understanding and Avoiding Employees Leaving, Thieving and Deceiving, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GómezCRosenB (2001) The leader–member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management26(1): 53–69.
35.
GouldnerAW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review25(2): 161–169.
36.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
37.
GreenglassER (1993) The contribution of social support to coping strategies. Applied Psychology: An International Review42(4): 323–340.
38.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRLBlackWC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
HarrisSGSuttonRI (1983) Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal29(1): 5–30.
40.
HolmesMShandD (1995) Management reform: Some practitioner perspectives on the past ten years. Governance8(4): 551–578.
41.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6: 1–55.
42.
HuntSDMorganRM (1994) Organizational commitment: One of many commitments or key mediating construct?Academy of Management Journal37: 1568–1587.
43.
KottkeJLSharafinskiCE (1988) Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement48: 1075–1079.
44.
LadeboOJ (2005) Effects of work-related attitudes on the intention to leave the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(3): 355–369.
45.
LapierreLM (2007) Supervisor trustworthiness and subordinates’ willingness to provide extra-role efforts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37(2): 272–297.
46.
LavelleJRuppDBrocknerJ (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management33: 841–866.
47.
LeeSHOlshfskiD (2002) An examination of variations in the nature of employee commitment: The case of paid and volunteer firefighters. International Review of Public Administration7: 29–38.
48.
LeeS-YWhitfordAB (2008) Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(4): 647–671.
49.
LeeTWMitchellTRHoltomBCMcDanielLHillJW (1999) Theoretical development and extension of the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal42: 450–462.
50.
LewisGBFrankSA (2002) Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review4(62): 395–404.
51.
LichtensteinRAlexanderJAMcCarthyJFWellsR (2004) Status differences in cross-functional teams: Effects on individual member participation, job satisfaction, and intent to quit. Journal of Health and Social Behavior45: 322–335.
52.
LinnaPPekkolaSUkkoJMelkasH (2010) Defining and measuring productivity in the public sector: Managerial perceptions. International Journal of Public Sector Management23(3): 300–320.
53.
McGurkP (2009) Developing ‘middle leaders’ in the public services? The realities of management and leadership development for public managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management22(6): 464–477.
54.
MarlerJHFisherSLKeW (2009) Employee self-service technology acceptance: A comparison of pre-implementation and post-implementation relationships. Personnel Psychology62: 327–358.
55.
MayerRDavisJSchoormanD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
56.
MilakovitchM (2003) Balancing customer service, empowerment and performance with citizenship, responsiveness and political accountability. International Public Management Review4: 61–82.
57.
MitchellTRLeeTW (2001) The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior23: 189–246.
58.
MoynihanDPLanduytN (2008) Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration28(2): 120–143.
59.
NgTWHSorensenKL (2008) Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes. Group & Organization Management3: 243–268.
60.
NobletAJRodwellJJ (2008) Integrating job stress and social exchange theories to predict employee strain in reformed public sector contexts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19: 555–578.
61.
PailléPMorinDGrimaF (2011) Managing commitment to customer in the public sector: Highlight the role of the supervisor. International Journal of Services Technology and Management16(3–4): 298–317.
62.
PanaccioAVandenbergheC (2010) Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior75(2): 224–236.
63.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-YPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
64.
RestubogSLHornseyMJBordiaPEsposoSR (2008) Effects of psychological contract breach on organizational citizenship behaviour: Insights from the group value model. Journal of Management Studies45(8): 1377–1400.
65.
Roadhes-ShanockLEisenbergerR (2006) When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology3: 689–695.
66.
RobbinsG (2007) Obstacles to implementation of New Public management in an Irish hospital. Financial Accountability & Management23(1): 55–71.
67.
RobinsonSL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 574–599.
68.
RothblumEDSolomonLJMurakamiJ (1986) Affective, cognitive and behavioural differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of Counseling Psychology33: 387–394.
69.
SchaningerWSTurnipseedDL (2005) The workplace social exchange network: Its effect on organizational citizenship behavior, contextual performance, job. In: TurnipseedDL (eds) Handbook of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Review of ‘Good Solder’ Activity in Organizations, New York: Novasciences Publisher, pp. 209–242.
70.
SchulerRJacksonS (2007) Strategic human resource management, London: Blackwell Publishing.
71.
SockeelPDujardinKDevosDDenèveCDestéeADefebvreL (2006) The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS), a new instrument for detecting and quantifying apathy: Validation in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery Psychiatry77: 579–584.
72.
SteelP (2007) The nature of procrastination: A meta-analysis and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin133(1): 65–94.
73.
StinglhamberFVandenbergheC (2003) Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior24: 251–270.
74.
StinglhamblerFde CremerDMerckenL (2006) Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust. Group & Organization Management31(4): 442–468.
75.
TanHHTanCSF (2000) Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social and General Monographs126(2): 241–260.
76.
Van EerdeW (2003) Procrastination at work and time management training. Journal of Psychology137(5): 421–434.
77.
Vigoda-GadotE (2004) InternaI politics in public administration systems. In: Vigoda-GadotECohenA (eds) Citizenship and Management in Public Administration, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 151–177.
78.
Vigoda-GadotEGolembiewskiRT (2001) Citizenship behaviour and the spirit of new managerialism: A theoretical framework and challenge for governance. American Review of Public Administration31(3): 273–295.
79.
WatDShafferMA (2005) Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of trust in the supervisor and empowerment. Personnel Review34(4): 406–422.
80.
WinslowJHNielsenKBorgV (2009) Generating support from supervisors to their subordinates in organizations under external pressure: A multilevel, multisource study of support and reciprocation in Danish elder care. Journal of Advanced Nursing65(12): 2649–2657.
