Research on Public Service Motivation (PSM) has increased enormously in the last 20 years. Besides the analysis of the antecedents of PSM and its impact on organizations and individuals, many open questions about the nature of PSM itself still remain. This article argues that the theoretical construct of PSM should be contextualized by integrating the political and administrative contexts of public servants when investigating their specific attitudes towards working in a public environment. It also challenges the efficacy of the classic four-dimensional structure of PSM when it is applied to a specific context. The findings of a confirmatory factor analysis from a dataset of 3754 employees of 279 Swiss municipalities support the appropriateness of contextualizing parts of the PSM construct. They also support the addition of an extra dimension called, according to previous research, Swiss democratic governance. With regard to our results, there is a need for further PSM research to set a definite measure of PSM, particularly in regard to the international diffusion of empirical research on PSM.
Points for practitioners
This study shows that public service motivation is a relevant construct for practitioners and may be used to better assess whether public agents are motivated by values or not. Nevertheless, it stresses also that the measurement of PSM must be adapted to the institutional context as well. Public managers interested in understanding better the degree to which their employees are motivated by public values must be aware that the measurement of this PSM construct has to be contextualized. In other words, PSM is also a function of the institutional environment in which organizations operate.
Antonsen M. and Jorgensen TB ( 1997) The ‘publicness’ of public organizations . Public Administration75(2): 337-357.
2.
Brewer GA and Selden SC ( 1998) Whistle blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8(3): 413-439.
3.
Buelens M. and Van den Broeck H. ( 2007) An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review67(1): 65-74.
4.
Camilleri E. ( 2006) Toward developing an organisational commitment-public service motivation model for the Maltese public service employees. Public Policy and Administration21(1): 63-83.
5.
Castaing S. ( 2006) The effect of psychological contract fulfilment and public service motivation on organizational commitment in the French public utilities . Public Policy and Administration21(1): 84-98.
6.
Cayer JN ( 2007) Public personnel and labor relations. In: Rabin J, Hildreth BW and Miller GJ (eds) Handbook of Public Administration. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, 345-379.
7.
CEC (2004) White Paper on Services of General Interest. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
8.
Cerase F. and Farinella D.(2009) Public service motivation: How does it relate to management reforms and changes in the working situation of public organizations? A case study of the Italian Revenue Agency. Public Policy and Administration24(3): 281-308.
9.
Chanlat J-F. ( 2003) Le managérialisme et l’éthique du bien commun: la question de la motivation au travail dans les services publics . In: Duvillier T, Genard J-L and Piraux A (eds) La motivation au travail dans les services publics . Paris : L’Harmattan, 51-64.
10.
Chevallier J. ( 2002) Science administrative. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
11.
Child J. ( 2002) Theorizing about organization cross-nationally: Part 1 - An introduction. In: Warner M and Joynt P (eds) Managing across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives. London: Thomson Learning, 26-39.
12.
Clark T. and Pugh D. ( 1999) Similarities and differences in European conceptions of human resource management. International Studies of Management & Organization29(4): 84-100.
13.
Coursey DH and Pandey SK ( 2007) Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s proposed scale. Administration and Society39(5): 547-568.
14.
Coursey DH, Perry JL, Brudney JL and Littlepage L. ( 2008) Psychometric verification of Perry’s Public Service Motivation instrument: Results for volunteer exemplars. Review of Public Personnel Administration28(1): 79-90.
15.
Cronbach LJ ( 1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychometrika16: 297-334.
16.
Deci EL and Ryan RM ( 1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior . New York: Plenum Press.
17.
DeHart-Davis L., Marlowe J. and Pandey SK ( 2006) Gender dimensions of public service motivation . Public Administration Review66(6): 873-887.
18.
Di Maggio PJ and Powell WW ( 1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review42(2): 147-163.
19.
Duguit L. ( 1913) Les transformations du droit public. Paris: Armand Colin.
20.
Duvillier T, Genard J-L and Piraux A (eds) ( 2003) La motivation au travail dans les services publics. Logiques de gestion. Paris: L’Harmattan .
21.
Egger-Peitler I., Hammerschmid G., et al. (2007) Motivation, identification and incentive preference as issues for modernisation and HR strategies in local government: First evidence from Austria. Annual conference of the EGPA. Public personnel policies study group: Madrid, Spain.
22.
Emery Y. and Giauque D. ( 2005) Emploi dans les secteurs public et privé: vers un processus confus d’hybridation. International Review of Administrative Sciences71(4): 639-657.
23.
Emery Y. and Giauque D. ( 2007) Dilemmes de la GRH publique. Le Mont-sur-Lausanne : LEP.
24.
Emery Y., Wyser C., Martin M. and Sanchez J. ( 2008) Swiss public servants’ perceptions of performance in fast-changing environment. International Review of Administrative Sciences74(2): 307-323.
25.
Fehr E. and Gintis H. ( 2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical fundations. Annual Review of Sociology33: 43-64.
26.
Forsthoff E. ( 1969) Traité de droit administratif allemand. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
27.
François P. and Vlassopoulos M. ( 2008) Pro-social motivation and the delivery of social services . Economic Studies54(1): 22-54.
28.
Grant A. ( 2008) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity . Journal of Applied Psychology93(1): 48-58.
Hansen MB ( 2009) Antecedents of PSM: The case of Danish municipal managers . International Public Service Motivation Research Conference: Bloomington, IN.
31.
Hattrup KK, Mueller K. and Aquire P. ( 2007) Operationalizing value importance in cross-cultural research: Comparing direct and indirect measures. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology80: 499-513.
32.
Hauriou M. ( 1923) Précis de Droit constitutionnel. Paris: Librairie de la Société du Recueil Sirey.
33.
Herzberg F., Mausner B. and Snyderman BB ( 1959) The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
34.
Ho S. and Cheung M. ( 2007) Using the combined etic-emic approach to develop a measurement of interpersonal subjective well-being in Chinese populations . In: Ong AD and van Dulmen M (eds) Oxford Handbook of Methods in Positive Psychology . Hong Kong: Oxford University Press , 139-152.
35.
Hofstede GH ( 1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
Hofstede G. ( 1983) The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies14(2): 75-89.
37.
Hondeghem A. and Vandenabeele W. ( 2005) Valeurs et motivations dans le service public: une perspective comparative. Revue française d’administration publique3(115): 463-479.
38.
Horton S. ( 2006) The public service ethos in the British civil service: An historical institutional analysis. Public Policy and Administration21(1): 32-48.
39.
Hunter JE and Gerbing DW ( 1982) Unidimensional measurement, second-order factor analysis, and causal models. In Staw BM and Cummings LL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CA: JAI Press, 267-299.
40.
Jellinek G. ( 1905) System der Subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte . Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
41.
John P. and Johnson M. ( 2008) Is there still a public service ethos? In: Park A, Curtice J, Thomson K, Phillips M, Johnson MC and Clery E (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 24th Report. London: Sage, 105-123.
42.
Jorgensen TB and Bozeman B. ( 2007) Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society39(3): 354-381.
43.
Jurkiewicz CL, Massey TK and Brown RG ( 1998) Motivation in public and private organizations: A comparative study. Public Productivity & Management Review21(3): 230-250.
44.
Kelloway KE ( 1998) Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
45.
Kim S. ( 2009a) Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19(4): 839-851.
46.
Kim S. ( 2009b) Revising Perry’s Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation. American Review of Public Administration39(2): 149-163.
47.
Kline P. ( 2000) The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.
48.
Knapp B. ( 1991) Précis de droit administratif. Bâle; Francfort-sur-le-Main: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
49.
Kriesi H. ( 1998) Le système politique suisse. Paris: Economica.
50.
Levine T. ( 2005) Confirmatory factor analysis and scale validation in communication research. Communication Research Reports22(4): 335-338.
51.
Linder W. ( 1994) Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: St Martin’s Press.
52.
Liu B., Tang N. and Zhu X. ( 2008) Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China . International Journal of Manpower29(8): 684-699.
53.
Lyons ST, Duxbury LE and Higgins C. ( 2006) A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review66(4): 605-618.
54.
MacCallum R., Roznowski M., Mar CM and Reith JV ( 1994) Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research29(1): 1-32.
55.
Mangenot M. ( 2005) Traditions nationales. In: Mangenot MAdministrations publiques et services d’intérêt général: quelle européanisation?Maastricht: IEAP.
56.
Marsh H., Hau K., Balla JR and Grayson D. ( 1998) Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research33(2): 181-220.
57.
Maslow A. ( 1954) Motivation and Personality. New York : Harper & Row.
58.
Meyer JW and Rowan B. ( 1991) Institutionalized organisation: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: Powell WW and Di Maggio PJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 41-62.
59.
Mueller K., Hattrup K and Hausmann N (2009) An investigation of cross-national differences in positivity and job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology82: 551-573.
60.
Muthén LK and Muthén B. ( 2008) Mplus Short courses: Topic 1. Available at: www.statmodel.com. Retrieved 14 April 2008 .
61.
Perry JL ( 1996) ‘Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6(1): 5-22.
62.
Perry JL ( 1997) Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7(2): 181-197.
63.
Perry JL ( 2000) Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2): 471-488.
64.
Perry JL and Hondeghem A. ( 2008) Editors’ introduction. In: Perry JL and Hondeghem A (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-14.
65.
Perry JL and Porter LW ( 1982) Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Journal7(1): 89-98.
66.
Perry JL and Vandenabeele W. ( 2008) Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation . In: Perry JL and Hondeghem A (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press, 56-80.
67.
Perry JL and Wise LR ( 1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50(3): 367-373.
68.
Pike K. ( 1954) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
69.
Piliavin JA and Grube JA ( 2002) Role as resource for action in public service. Journal of Social Issues58(3): 469-485.
70.
Pratchett L. and Wingfield M. ( 1996) Petty bureaucracy and woolly-minded liberalism? The changing ethos of a local governement officers. Public Administration74: 639-656.
71.
Pudelko M. ( 2006) Universalities, particularities, and singularities in cross-national management research. International Studies of Management & Organization36: 9-37.
72.
Rainey HG ( 1982) Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the public ethic. American Review of Public Administration16(4): 288-302.
73.
Rainey HG and Steinbauer P. ( 1999) Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9(1): 1-32.
74.
Ritz A.(2009) Public service motivation and organisational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences75(1): 53-78.
75.
Ritz A. (in press) Attraction to public policy making: A qualitative inquiry into improvements in PSM measurement. Public Administration - An International Quarterly.
76.
Rouban L. ( 1997) Le statut de la fonction publique. Education permanente130(1): 33-34.
77.
Rouban L. ( 2001) Les Fonctionnaires. Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu.
78.
Scott RW ( 1995) Institutions and Organizations. London : Sage.
79.
Sen A. ( 1995) Rationality and social choice. American Economic Review85(1): 1-24.
80.
Steers R. and Sanchez-Runde C. ( 2002) Culture, motivation, and work behavior. In: Gannon M and Newman K (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-cultural Management. Oxford : Blackwell , 190-216.
81.
Steiner R. ( 2000) New public management in Swiss municipalities. International Public Management Journal3: 169-189.
82.
Triandis H., McCusker C., Betancourt H., Iwao S., Leung K., Salazar JM, Setiadi B., Sinha JBP, Touzard H. and Zaleski Z. ( 1993) An etic-emic analysis of individualism and collectivism . Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology24(3): 366-383.
83.
Vandenabeele W. ( 2007) Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review9(4): 545-556.
84.
Vandenabeele W. ( 2008) Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal11(1): 143-167.
85.
Vandenabeele W. and Van de Walle S. ( 2008) International differences in public service motivation: Comparing regions across the world. In: Perry JL and Hondeghem A (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press, 223-244.
86.
Vandenabeele W., Sheepers S. and Hondeghem A. ( 2006) Public service motivation in an international comparative perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and Administration1: 13-31.
87.
Vandenabeele W., Steijn B., Camilleri E., Cerase F., Egger-Peitler I., Hammerschmid G., Hondeghem A., Leisink P., Meyer RE and Ritz A. ( 2008) Comparing public service motivation within various Europe countries: Do institutional environments make a difference? EGPA Annual Conference . Rotterdam: September .
88.
Vandenberg R. and Lance C. ( 2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods3(1): 4-70.
89.
Vandenberghe C., Stinglhamber F., Bentein K. and Delhaise T. ( 2001) An examination of the cross-cultural validity of a multidimensional model of commitment in Europe. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology32(3): 322-347.
90.
Vinsonneau G. ( 2003) Culture et comportement [Culture and Behaviour] . Paris: Armand Colin.
91.
Wisard N. ( 2007) Le statut de la fonction publique en mutation: contrat de droit public et individualisation des conditions de travail. In: Emery Y and Giauque D (eds) Dilemmes de la GRH publique. Lausanne: Loisirs et Pédagogie, 37-64.
92.
Wright BE ( 2008) Methodological challenges associated with public service motivation research. In: Perry JL and Hondeghem A (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press, 80-100.
93.
Wright BE and Grant AM ( 2009) Advancing public service motivation research: Research designs for key questions about emergence and effects. Paper presented at the International Public Service Motivation Conference . Bloomington: IN.
94.
Wright BE and Pandey SK ( 2005) Exploring the nomological map of the public service motivation concept. Paper presented at the 8th Public Management Conference. Los Angeles: CA.
