The Kinnock reform has changed the European Commission. This article discusses the link between reform effects and policy output. A survey of more than 100 heads of unit (HoU) of policy-making Directorates-General serves as the empirical basis. It is concluded that the recent reform of the Commission does indeed comprehensively redefine the role of the HoU. Their resource base to focus on policy drafting has been hugely reduced. Negative consequences for the organization’s potential to deliver policy draft of high quality are therefore very likely.
Points for practitioners
This article deals with the following areas:
• Middle management as organizational backbone
• The perils of decentralizing management functions
• The impact of administrative reform on policy output.
Balint, T., Bauer, M.W. and Knill, C. ( 2008) ‘Bureaucratic Change in the European Administrative Space: The Case of theEuropean Commission’, West European Politics31(4): 677-700.
2.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2001) A Creeping Transformation? The European Commission and the Management of EU Structural Funds in Germany. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
3.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2005) ‘The European Commission’, in Peter M. van der Hoek (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration and Policy in the European Union, pp. 149-76. Boca Raton, London, New York: Taylor & Francis.
4.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2007) ‘The Politics of Reforming the European Commission Administration’, in M.W. Bauer and C. Knill (eds) Management Reforms in International Organizations, pp. 54-69. Baden-Baden: Nomos .
5.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2008a) ’Der Throughput-Output-Nexus in der empirischen Verwaltungswissenschaft’, Die Verwaltung41(1) : 63-76.
6.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2008b) ‘Diffuse Anxieties, Deprived Entrepreneurs: Commission Reform and Middle Management’, Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 691-707.
7.
Bauer, M.W., Knill, C., Balint, T. and Benzing, S. ( 2008) ‘Decentralisation following the Reform of the European Commission: Evaluation and Perception’, Final Report, European Parliament, Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union, Brussels.
8.
Bauer, M.W., Knill, C. and Ziegler, M. ( 2006) ’Koordinierter Inkrementalismus - Optionen für eine Reform institutioneller Arrangements zur politischen Planung und Koordination’ , Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften4(4): 549-75.
9.
Bearfield, N.D. ( 2004) ‘Reforming the European Commission: Driving Reform from the Grassroots’, Public Policy and Administration19(5): 13-24.
10.
Christiansen, T. ( 2006) ‘The European Commission: The European Executive between Continuity and Change’, in J. Richardson (ed.) European Union. Power and Policy-making , pp. 99-117. New York: Routledge.
11.
Cini, M. ( 1996) The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the EU Administration. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
12.
Cini, M. ( 2004) ‘The Reform of the European Commission: An Ethical Perspective’, Public Policy and Administration19(3): 42-54.
13.
Cokins, G. ( 1996) Activity-based Cost Management: Making it Work. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Cram, L. ( 1993) ‘Calling the Tune without Paying the Piper? The Role of the Commission in European Community Social Policy’, Policy and Politics21: 135-46.
15.
European Commission (2000) ‘Reforming the Commission’, A White Paper, part I, COM (2000) 200/ final 2.
16.
Héritier, A. ( 1997) ‘Policy-making by Subterfuge: Interest Accommodation, Innovation and Substitute Democratic Legitimation in Europe - Perspectives from Distinct Policy Areas’, Journal of European Public Policy4(2): 171-89.
17.
Kassim, H. ( 2004a) ‘A Historic Accomplishment: The Prodi Commission and Administrative Reform’, in D.G. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.) The Changing European Commission, pp. 33-63. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
Kassim, H. ( 2004b) ‘The Kinnock Reforms in Perspective: Why Reforming the Commission is an Heroic, but Thankless Task’, Public Policy and Administration19(3): 25-41.
19.
Kassim, H. ( 2008) ‘Mission Impossible, but Mission Accomplished: The Kinnock Reforms and theEuropean Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 648-68.
20.
Kassim, Hussein, Peterson, John, Hooghe, Liesbet, Bauer, Michael W., Dehousse, Renaud and Thompson, Andrew ( 2010) The European Commission in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in preparation).
21.
Laffan, B. ( 1997) ‘From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: The Challenge Facing theEuropean Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy4(3): 422-38.
22.
Levy, R. ( 2004) ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Implementing Management Reform in theEuropean Commission’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management17: 166-77.
23.
Levy, R. ( 2006) ‘European Commission Overload and the Pathology of Management Reform: Garbage Can, Rationality and Risk Aversion’, Public Administration84(2): 423-39.
24.
Metcalfe, L. ( 1992) ‘After 1992: Can the Commission Manage Europe?’ , Australian Journal of Public Administration51(1): 117-30.
25.
Metcalfe, L. ( 2000) ‘Reforming the Commission: Will Organisational Efficiency Produce Effective Governance?’, Journal of Common Market Studies38(5): 817-41.
26.
Nugent, N. (ed.) (1997) At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission. London: Macmillan.
27.
Nugent, N. ( 2001) The European Commission. New York: Palgrave.
28.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. ( 2004) Public Management Reform - A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Sabatier, P.A. ( 1993) ‘Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen: Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik’, in A. Héritier (ed.) Policy Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung , pp. 116-48. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
30.
Schön-Quinlivan, E. ( 2008) ‘Implementing Organisational Change - The Case of the Kinnock Reforms’, Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 726-42.
31.
Spence, D.B. ( 2006) ‘The Directorates General and the Services: Structures, Functions and Procedures’, in D.B. Spence and G. Edwards (eds) The European Commission, pp. 128-55. London: John Harper Publishing.
32.
Stevens, H. and Stevens, A. ( 2006) ‘The Internal Reform of the Commission’, in D.B. Spence and G. Edwards (eds) The European Commission, pp. 454-80. London : John Harper.
