New Public Management (NPM) is a package of organizational reforms which have been implemented in large parts of the world. NPM reforms hold elements of centralization as well as of fragmentation. This article focuses on the balance between these elements, providing a comparative perspective by analysing the railway sector in each of the Scandinavian countries. The empirical basis is document analyses and qualitative research interviews. The article has two aims. First, attention is directed towards understanding the mixture of fragmentation and coordination in each country. Second, efforts are made to explain differences in national mixtures. Explanations are derived from four analytical perspectives: (1) fragmentation and coordination trajectory; (2) path dependency; (3) the punctuated equilibrium metaphor and (4) political orientation. The differences seem to find their cause in divergent political-administrative traditions, as well as in current events. No single analytical perspective, however, provides a comprehensive explanation on all differences observed.
Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J. and Walsh, P. (1996) Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bouckaert, Geert, Peters, Guy B. and Verhoest, Koen (2006) `Janus Faced Re-organisation: Specialisation and Co-ordination in Four Countries in the Period 1985—2005', paper presented at the EGPA Conference, Milan , 6—8 September.
4.
Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (1991) The Reforming Organization. London and New York : Routledge.
5.
Challis, L., Fuller, S., Henwood, M., Klein, R., Plowden, W., Webb, A., Wittingham, P. and Wistow, G. (1988) Joint Approach to Social Policy: Rationality and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2002) `A Transformative Perspective on Administrative Reforms', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
7.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2004) `Globalization of Administrative Reforms: The Dilemmas of Combining Political Control and Increased Institutional Autonomy'. Bergen: The Rokkan Centre. Available at http://www.rokkansenteret.uib.no/vr/rca/Paper/HandbookGlobalizationTC-PLnov2004.doc
8.
Danish Government (2005) Resultatkontrakt med Banedanmark. Marts 2005 til marts 2006.
9.
Danish Government (2006) Resultatkontrakt med Banedanmark. Marts 2006 til marts 2007.
10.
Danish Ministry of Finance (2005) Statens selskaber 2005, available at www.fm.dk.
11.
Danish Parliament (2006) `Om tilsyn med Banedanmark', Tuesday 18 April 2006. Downloadable from www.folketinget.dk, 22 November 2006.
12.
DiMaggio, App. and Powell, W.W. (1991) `The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields', pp. 63—82 in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis . Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
Fog, J. ( 1997) Med samtalen som udgangspunkt. Det kvalitative forskningsinterview . Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
14.
Frendreis, J.P. (1983) `Explanation of Variation and Detection of Covariation: The Purpose and Logic of Comparative Analysis', Comparative Political Studies16: 255—72.
15.
Hood, C. (1991) `A Public Management for all Seasons?', Public Administration69 (Spring): 3—19.
16.
Krasner, S. (1984) `Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics', Comparative Politics16(2): 223—46.
17.
Krasner, S. (1988) `Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective', Comparative Political Studies21: 66—94.
18.
Kristensen, O.P. (1984) `Privatisering: Modernisering af den Offentlige Sektor eller Ideologisk Korstog?', Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift65(2): 97—120.
19.
Lindbom, A. (1997) Ministeren och makten. Hur fungerar ministerstyre i praktiken? SOU 1997:54, Finansdepartementet, Stockholm .
20.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organisational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
21.
Ministry of Transport and Communications ( 2004) 'Om konkurranseutsetting- og omstilling av Jernbaneverkets produksjonsvirksomhet', St.prp.nr. 1 Attachment nr.2 (2004—2005).
22.
Nordby, T. (2000) I politikkens sentrum. Variasjoner i Stortingets makt 1814—2000. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget .
23.
Olsen, Johan P. (1992) Analyzing Institutional Dynamics. Norwegian Research Centre in Organization and Management, Bergen, Working Paper 92/14.
24.
O'Sullivan, P.J. and Patel, T. (2004) `Fragmentation in Transport Operations and the Case for System Integrity', TransportPolicy11(3): 215—25.
25.
Pedersen, O.K. and Lægreid, P. (1999) `Fra opbygning til ombygning', in P. Lægreid and O.K. Pedersen (eds) Fra opbygning til ombygning i staten: Organisationsforandringer i tre nordiske lande. København: Jurist- og konomforbundetsForlag.
26.
Peters, B.G. (1998) `Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Coordination', Public Administration76: 295—311.
27.
Petersson, O. (1995) The Government and Politics of the Nordic Countries . Stockholm: CE Fritzes AB.
28.
Pollitt, C. (2003) `Joined-up Government: A Survey'. Political Studies Review1: 34—49.
29.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
30.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2006) `Path Dependency: A Comparative Application at the Organizational Level', paper submitted to Public Management Review.
31.
Ravlum, I.A. (2003) Styring og samordning i den reformerte staten. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
32.
Sørensen, C.H. and Ravlum, I.A. (2004) 'Styring i transportpolitikken — et forstudie. Kan Norge lære af Sverige og Danmark', Paper for the 12th National Conference in Political Science. Oslo : TI.
33.
Sou (2005) Liberalisering, regler och marknader, Swedish Public Report, 2005: 4.
34.
Swedish Government (2005) Verksamhetsberättelse för företag med statligt ägande 2004. Näringsdepartementet .
35.
Swedish Government (2006) Moderna transporter. Regeringens proposition 2005/06:160 [Swedish Government Proposition, `Modern Transportation']. Available at http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/06/07/77/0082fedf.pdf
36.
The Soria Moria Declaration (2005) ` Policy Platform for the Government Coalition of the Labour Party, the Socialist Left Party and the Norwegian Centre Party.' Available at: http://odin.dep.no/filarkiv/260512/regjeringsplatform.pdf
37.
Thelen, K. (2003) `How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis', pp. 208—40 in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Tranøy, B.S. (2000) `Losing Credit. The Politics of Liberalization and Macro-economic Regime Change in Norway 1980—92', PhD dissertation , Institute of Political Science, the University of Oslo.
