Astier, Stéphane (2004) ‘Ethical Regulation of the Internet: The Challenges of Global Governance’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, this issue, pp. 133-150.
2.
Bao, Jing (2004) ‘E-government’s Affections on Citizen Society, Publication and Democracy’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
3.
Bensghir, Turksel Kaya , Altinok, A. Ramazan , Yuksel, Fatih and Tekinkus, Mehmet (2004) ‘Expectations of the Turkish Citizens and Provincial and District Administrators from E-government’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
4.
Buchanan, Mark (2002) Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks. New York: W.W. Norton .
5.
Cloete, Fanie (2004) ‘Maximising the Potential of Transforming Policy Failure into Policy Success: E-government, the Digital Divide and E-development’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
6.
Dass, Jagannth (2004) ‘E-governing Cyber Laws. Pre-requisite for Administrating/Policing the Cyber-security’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
7.
Draper, Gordon (2004) ‘Introductory Paper’ , Workshop III of 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
8.
Dugdale, Anni , Daly, Anne , Papandrea, Franco and Maley, Maria (2004) ‘Accessing E-government: Challenges for Citizens and Organizations’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, this issue, pp. 109-118.
9.
Fountain, Jane E. (2001) Building the Virtual State. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press .
10.
Furukawa, Shunichi (2004) ‘Introductory Paper’ , Workshop II, 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences inSeoul, Korea.
11.
Gamble, Andrew (2000) ‘Economic Governance’, in Jon Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance,! pp. 110-137. Oxford: Oxford University Press ,
12.
Haque, Shamsul (2004) ‘The Changing Relationship Between Bureaucracy and Citizens Under E-governance in Singapore’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
13.
Hirai, Bunzo (2004) ‘The Effect of Internet on Democratization of Advisory Councils and Roundtables in Japan’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
14.
Jan, Chung-Yuang , Wang, Chun-Yuang and Hsu, Keng-Ming (2004) ‘A Study of Digital Democracy and E-voting. The Experience of Practical Process in Taiwan’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
15.
Jho, Whasun (2004) ‘Challenges for E-governance: Protests from Civil Society on the Protection of Privacy in E-government in Korea’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, this issue, pp. 151-166.
16.
Kamarck, Elaine C. and Nye, Joseph S. , eds (2002) Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press .
17.
Kernaghan, Kenneth (2004) ‘Moving Towards the Virtual State: Integrating Services and Service Channels for Citizen-centred Delivery’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, this issue, pp. 119-131.
18.
Kettl, Donald F. (2002) The Transformation of Governance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
19.
Kim, Pan Suk (2000) ‘Administrative Reform in the Korean Central Government’ , Public Performance and Management Review24(2): 145-160 .
20.
Kim, Pan Suk (2002) ‘Strengthening Administrative Capacities and Using Human Resources for Growth and Development’ , Proceedings of the Second Specialized International Conference of IIAS, pp. 71-91 . New Delhi, India.
21.
Kim, Seang-Tae (2004) ‘Toward a New Paradigm of E-government: From Bureaucracy Model to Governance Model , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
22.
Klazar, Stanislav , Nemec, Juraj , Pribil, Jiri and Sumpikova, Marketa (2004) ‘E-governance and Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Expenditure Programmes: Current Situation in the Czech Republic’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
23.
Kooiman, Jan , ed. (1993) Modern Governance: Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage .
24.
Kroukamp, Hendri (2004) ‘E-Governance in South Africa: Are We Coping?’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
25.
Kudo, Hiroko (2004) ‘E-governance in South-east Asian Countries: Changing Management, Interface, Accountability, and Transparency in Public Sector’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
26.
Lynch, Cynthia E. (2004) ‘Organizational Structure in the 21st Century: How Do We Know If Anything Has Really Changed?’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
27.
Maenpaa, Olli (2004) ‘Introductory Paper’ , Workshop I, 26th International Congress of Administrative Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
28.
Maisl, Herbert (2004) ‘Introductory Paper’ , Workshop IV, 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
29.
Mekhantar, Joel and Favier, Laurence (2004) ‘La democratie a l’heure du vote electronique (experimentations, significations et place du vote electronique dans la theorization de la democratie digitale)’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
30.
Moon, Sin-Yong (2004) ‘Challenges and Strategies of E-government Initiatives in Korea: How Is It Implemented and What Remains’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
31.
Njunwa, Mujwahuzi (2004) ‘Strengthening Tanzania’s Public Administration Through Electronic Governance: Prospects and Problems’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
32.
Perri 6 (2004) E-governance: Styles of Political Judgment in the Information Age Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan .
33.
Peters, B. Guy (1996) The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas .
34.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflectivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press .
35.
Riley, Thomas B. (2004) ‘E-government vs. E-governance: Examining the Difference in a Changing Public Sector Climate’, International Tracking Survey Report No. 4, Commonwealth Center for E-governance, Ottawa, Canada, URL (consulted 2004): http://www.electronicgov.net.
36.
Saim, Hajah Sainah (2004) ‘E-government Effects: Pros and Cons for Brunei Darussalam’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
37.
Sarveswaran, K.V. (2004) ‘E-readiness for Changing the Administrative Structures and Processes in Employees Provident Fund Organisation: An Experience to Share’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
38.
Sarwar, Mohammed Jabed (2004) ‘Prospect of E-government of Bangladesh’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
39.
Snellen, Ignace (2002) ‘Electronic Governance: Implications for Citizens, Politicians and Public Servants’ , International Review of Administrative Sciences68(2): 183-189 .
40.
Trudel, Pierre (2004) ‘E-gouvernance et évolution des concepts du droit de l’information: le cas de la protection des données personnelles dans l’Etat en réseau’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
41.
Wang, Shida (2004) ‘On the Status of Government Credit in Modern Administration Culture’ , paper presented at the 26th Congress of Administrative Sciences in Seoul, Korea.
42.
Watts, Duncan J. (2003) Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton .