This article attempts to provide an understanding of the conflict phenomenon in the UK higher education sector. A research survey was conducted in order to examine the role conflict associated with the headship position in the contemporary university context. ‘Janusian’ and ‘value’ conflict were the forms of role conflict experienced by heads of departments. On the one hand, heads' efforts to provide the critical link between the managerial requirements of the modern university and academic staffs' values of their departments, in addition to the performance of their academic core activities led to the development of ‘Janusian’ role conflict. On the other hand, the emphasis on market mechanisms in higher education and the departure from the traditional academic work values, in an era characterized by change, uncertainty and complexity contributed to the appearance of the ‘value’ conflict among heads of departments. However, both of these conflict dimensions were relative to the type of institution (new/old university category).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, S. (1992) ‘ New Perspectives on an Older Problem: The Position of Women Academics in British Higher Education ’, Higher Education24.
2.
Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education .
3.
Barnett, R. (2003) Beyond All Reason. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education .
4.
Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1994) Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Routledge .
5.
Bennett, J. and Figuli, D. (1990) Enhancing Departmental Leadership: The Roles of the Chairperson. New York: Macmillan .
6.
Bensimon, E. , Neumann, A. and Birnbaum, R. (1989) Making Sense of Administrative Leadership: The ‘L’ Word in Higher Education (Higher Education Report 1). Washington, D.C.: American Society for Higher Education .
7.
Blackburn, R. , Horowitz, S. , Edington, D. and Klos, D. (1986) ‘ University Faculty and Administrator Responses to Job Strains ’, Research in Higher Education25(1).
8.
Boyer, E. , Altbach, P. and Whitelaw, M. (1994) The Academic Profession: An International Perspective.Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation .
9.
Carnegie Foundation (1991) International Survey of Academic Profession, 1991–93.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
10.
Ceccio, J. (1991) ‘ Job Related Stress Among Business and Professional Writing Faculty Members ’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication16(1).
11.
Clark, B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways for Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon .
12.
Creswell, J. , Wheeler, D. , Seagren, A. , Egly, N. and Beyer, K. (1990) The Academic Chairpersońs Handbook. Lincoln, NA: University of Nebraska Press .
13.
Davies, J. et al. (1987) ‘ The Entrepreneurial and Adaptive University ’, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education11(1).
14.
Dearing Report (1997) Higher Education: A Vision for 20 Years?London: Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office .
15.
Dillemas, R. (1996) ‘The Academic Profession in Western Europe’, in P. Maassen and Fr. Van Vught (eds) Inside Academia — New Challenges for the Academic Profession.Utrecht: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies .
16.
Filmer, P. (1997) ‘Disinderestedness and the Modern University’, in A. Smith and F. Webster (eds) The Post Modern University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
17.
French, J. , Caplan, R. and Harrison, R. (1982) The Mechanisms of Job Stress and Strain. New York: John Wiley and Sons .
18.
Fulton, O. (1996) ‘The Academic Profession in England on the Eve of Structural Reform’, in P. Altbach (ed.) The International Academic Profession.Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching .
19.
Geurts, P. and Maassen, P. (1996) ‘Academics and Institutional Governance’, in P. Maassen and Fr. Van Vught (eds) Inside Academia — New Challenges for the Academic Profession.Utrecht: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies .
20.
Gmelch, W. and Burns, J. (1993) ‘ The Cost of Academic Leadership: Department Chair Stress ’, Innovative Higher Education17(4).
21.
Goedegebuure, L. , De Boer, H. and Van Vught, Fr. (1996) ‘Governance and Management of Higher Education’, in P. Maassen and Fr. Van Vught (eds) Inside Academia — New Challenges for the Academic Profession.Utrecht: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies .
22.
Gray, H. (1992) ‘ Some Reflections on the Common Wealth of Learning ’, Science256.
23.
Handy, C. (1984) ‘Education for Management Outside Business’, in S. Goodlad (ed.) ‘Education for the Professions.Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education and NFER-Nelson .
24.
Hayes, R. , Wheelwright, S. and Clark, K. (1988) ‘Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organisation.New York: The Free Press .
25.
Henkel, M. (1997) ‘ Academic Values and the University as Corporate Enterprise ’, Higher Education Quarterly51(2).
26.
Howarth, A. (1991) ‘ Market Forces in Higher Education ’, Higher Education Quarterly45(1).
27.
Jarratt, A. (1985) Report of the Steering Committee on Efficiency Studies in Universities.London: Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals .
28.
Jones, A. and Hendry, C. (1994) The Learning Organisation. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons .
29.
Kogan, M. , Moses, I. and El-Khawas, E. (1994) Staffing Higher Education — Meeting New Challenges. London: Jessica Kingsley .
30.
Lewis, L. and Altbach, P. (1996) ‘ Faculty Versus Administration: A Universal Problem ’, Higher Education Policy9(3).
31.
Maassen, P. and Van Vught, Fr. (1996) Inside Academia: New Challenges for the Academic Profession. Utrecht: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies .
32.
McNair, G. (1990) ‘ The British Enterprise in Higher Education Initiative ’, Higher Education Management2(1).
33.
McNay, I. (1995) ‘From the Collegial Academy to Corporate Enterprise’, in T. Schuller (ed.) The Changing University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education .
34.
McVicar, M. (1992) ‘Education’, in D. Farnham and S. Horton (eds) Managing the New Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
35.
Middlehurst, R. (1993) Leading Academics.Buckingham: Open University Press .
36.
Middlehurst, R. and Elton, L. (1992) ‘ Leadership and Management in Higher Education ’, Studies in Higher Education17(3).
37.
Miller, H. (1995) ‘States, Economies and the Changing Labour Process of Academics: Australia, Canada and the UK’, in J. Smyth (ed.) Academic Work. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press .
38.
Moodie, G. (1986) ‘ The Disintegrating Chair: Professors in Britain Today ’, European Journal of Education21(1).
39.
Moses, I. (1985) ‘ The Role of Head of Department in the Pursuit of Excellence ’, Higher Education14: 337–354 .
40.
Moses, I. and Roe, E. (1990) Heads and Chairs: Managing Academic Department. University of Queensland Press .
41.
Neave, G. and Van Vught, Fr. (1991) ‘Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe.Oxford: Pergamon Press .
42.
Peddler, M. , Burgoyne, J. and Boydell, T. (1991) Learning Company. London: McGraw-Hill .
43.
Pollitt, C. (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services. Oxford: Blackwell .
44.
Pratt, J. (1994) ‘ Managerialism in Higher Education ’, Higher Education Review26(2).
45.
Ramsden, P. (1998) Learning to Lead in Higher Education.London: Routledge .
46.
Rubienska, A. (2001) ‘ Education and Training in Public Administration and Development: What Does the Customer Really Want and Are We Prepared to Provide It? ’, Public Administration and Development21.
47.
Scott, P. (1995) The Meanings of Mass Higher Education.Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
48.
Shumar, W. (1995) ‘Higher Education and the State: The Irony of Fordism in American Universities’, in J. Smyth (ed.) Academic Work: The Changing Labour Process in Higher Education.Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
49.
Slaughter, S. (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
50.
Smith, A. and Webster, F. (1997) The Post Modern University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
51.
Thompson, A. and Strickland, A. (1992) Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin .
52.
Thorne, M. and Cuthbert, R. (1996) ‘Autonomy, Bureaucracy and Competition: The ABC of Control in Higher Education’, in R. Cuthbert (ed.) Working in Higher Education.Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
53.
Thorsen, E. (1996) ‘ Stress in Academe: What Bothers Professors? ’, Higher Education31(4).
54.
Trow, M. (1976) ‘ The American Academic Department as a Context for Learning ’, Studies in Higher Education1(1).
55.
Trow, M. (1994) ‘ Managerialism and the Academic Profession: The Case of England ’, Higher Education Policy7(2).
56.
Tucker, A. (1992) Chairing the Academic Department (American Council of Education) ORYX Press, USA .
57.
Wall, J. and Callister, R. (1995) ‘ Conflict and its Management ’, Journal of Management21(3).
58.
Williams, G. (1992) Changing Patterns of Finance in Higher Education. London: Society for Research into Higher Education .
59.
Williams, G. (1994) Reforms and Potential Reforms in Higher Education Finance (OECD Conference Proceedings). Paris: OECD.
