Aucoin, Peter (1988) ‘Contraction, Managerialism and Decentralization in Canadian Government’, Governance3(2): 144–161.
2.
Adams, Guy B. and White, Jay D. (1994) ‘Dissertation Research in Public Administration and Cognate Fields: An Assessment of Methods and Quality’, Public Administration Review54(6): 565–576.
3.
Allison, Graham T. (1983) ‘Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportants Respects?’, in J.L. Perry and K.L. Kraemer (eds) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
4.
Argyris, Chris and Schon, Donald (1978) Organizational Learning: The Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Astley, W. Graham and van de Ven, Andrew H. (1983) ‘Central Debates and Perspectives in Organization Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly28(2): 245–273.
6.
Aucoin, Peter (1990) ‘Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums’, Governance3(2): 115–137.
7.
Averch, Harvey and Dluhy, Milan (1997) ‘Teaching Public Administration, Public Management and Policy Analysis: Some International Comparisons’, International Journal of Public Administration20(2): 497–511.
8.
Bailey, Mary Timney (1994) ‘Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts On Public Administration Research’, in J.D. White and G.B. Adams (eds) Research in Public Administration. Reflections on Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage and ASPA.
9.
Bardach, Eugene (1994) ‘The Problem of Best Practice Research’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13(2): 260–268.
10.
Barley, Stephen , Meyer, Gordon W. and Gash, Debra (1988) ‘Cultures of Culture: Academics, Practitioners and the Pragmatics of Normative Control’, Administrative Science Quarterly33(1): 24–60.
11.
Barzelay, Michael , in collaboration with Armajani, Babak J. (1992) Breaking Through Bureaucracy. A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Behn, Robert D. (1987) ‘The Nature of Knowledge about Public Management: Lessons for Research and Teaching from our Knowledge about Chess and Warfare’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7(1): 200–212.
13.
Behn, Robert D. (1995) ‘The Big Questions of Public Management’, Public Administration Review55(4): 313–324.
14.
Behn, Robert D. (1996) ‘Public Management: Should it Strive to be Art, Science, or Engineering?’Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6(1): 91–123.
15.
Bendor, Jonathan (1976) ‘A Theoretical Problem in Comparative Administration’, Public Administration Review36(6): 626–630.
16.
Blais, André and Dion, Stéphane (eds) (1991) The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat. Appraisals and Evidence. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
17.
Borins, Sandford (1988) ‘Public Choice: ‘Yes Minister’ Made it Popular, but does Winning the Nobel Prize Make it True?’, Canadian Public Administration31(1): 12–26.
18.
Borins, Sandford (1994) Government in Transition: A New Paradigm in Public Administration. A Report on the Inaugural Conference of the Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management. Toronto: CAPAM.
19.
Borins, Sandford (1995) ‘The New Public Management is Here to Stay’, Canadian Public Administration38(1): 122–132.
20.
Bouchard, Gilles (1992) ‘Review of Roland Parenteau (ed.) (1992) Management public. Comprendre et gérer les institutions de l’État. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec’, Revue québécoise de science politique 22: 161–3.
21.
Bourgault, Jacques and Dion, Stéphane (1990) ‘Canadian Senior Civil Servants and Transitions of Government: The Whitehall Model Seen from Ottawa’, International Review of Administrative Science56(1): 149–169.
22.
Bozeman, Barry (1993) ‘Theory, ‘Wisdom’ and the Character of Knowledge in Public Management: A Critical View of the Theory-Practice’, in B. Bozeman (ed.) Public Management. The State of the Art. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Burrell, Gibson and Morgan, Gareth (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
24.
Cabinet Office (1988) Improving Management in Government. The Next Steps. London: HMSO.
25.
Canada, Government (1990) Public Service 2000. The Renewal of the Public Service of Canada. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
26.
Charih, Mohamed and Rouillard, Lucie (1997) ‘The New Public Management’, in Charih Mohamed and Arthur Daniels (eds) New Public Management and Public Administration in Canada, pp. 27–45. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada and École nationale d’administration publique.
27.
Cheung, Anthony B.L. (1997) ‘Understanding Public Sector Reforms: Global Trends and Diverse Agendas’, International Review of Administrative Science63(4): 435–457.
28.
Chevallier, Jacques and Loschak, Danièle (1978) Traité de science administrative. Part I. Théorie générale de l’institution administrative. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
29.
Chevallier, Jacques and Loschak, Danièle (1982) ‘Rationalité juridique et rationalité managériale dans l’administration française’, Revue française d’administration publique 24: 679–720.
30.
Colclough, Glenna and Horan, Patrick M. (1983) ‘The Status Attainment Paradigm: An Application of a Kuhnian Perspective’, The Sociological Quarterly24(1): 25–42.
31.
Corry, J.A. (1955) ‘The Prospect for the Rule of Law’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science21: 405–415.
32.
Demming, W.E. (1982) Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Denhardt, Robert B. (1993) The Pursuit of Significance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
Dimock, Marchall E. (1952) ‘Bureaucracy Self-Examined’, in R.K. Merton et al. (eds) Reader in Bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
35.
Dwivedi, O.P. and Gow, J.I. (1999) From Bureaucracy to Public Management. The Administrative Culture of the Government of Canada. Toronto and Peterborough: Broadview Press and Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
36.
Eckberg, Douglas Lee and Hill, Lester H. Jr (1979) ‘The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review’, American Sociological Review44(6): 925–937.
37.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1969) The Political Systems of Empires. The Rise and Fall of Historical Bureaucratic Societies, 2nd edn.New York: Free Press.
38.
Etzioni, Amitai (1988) The Moral Dimension. New York: Free Press.
39.
Fitch, Lyle C. (1996) Making Democracy Work. The Life and Letters of Luther Halsey Gulick, 1892–1993. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
40.
Ford, Robin and Zussman, David (eds) (1997) Alternative Service Delivery. Sharing Governance in Canada. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
41.
France, Government (1989) Le pari de la responsabilité: rapport de la Commission Efficacité de l’Etat. Paris: Commissariat général du plan.
42.
Frederickson, George (1980) New Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
43.
Friedman, Milton (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Frost-Kumpf, Lee and Weschler, Barton (1993) ‘A Metaphor Rooted in a Fable’, in B. Bozeman (ed.) Public Management. The State of the Art. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Golembiewski, Robert T. (1977) ‘A Critique of “Democratic Administration” and its Supporting Ideation’, American Political Science Review77(4): 1488–1507.
46.
Golembiewski, Robert T. (1985) Humanizing Public Organizations. Mt Airy: Lomond.
47.
Golembiewski, Robert T. (1996) ‘The Future of Public Administration: End of a Short Stay in the Sun? Or a New Day A-dawning?’, Public Administration Review56(2): 139–148.
48.
Goodsell, Charles (1985) The Case for Bureaucracy, 2nd edn.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
49.
Gore, Albert (1993) Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
Gow, James Iain (1993) ‘Les problématiques changeantes en administration publique (1965–1992)’, Revue québécoise de science politique23: 59–105.
51.
Gow, James Iain (1994) Learning from Others. Administrative Innovations Among Canadian Governments. Toronto: The Institute of Public Administration of Canada and Canadian Centre for Management Development.
52.
Gow, James Iain (1995) ‘Reason and Intuition in Social Science and Action’, in C.E.S. Franks et al. (eds) Canada’s Century: Governance in a Maturing Society. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press.
53.
Gray, Andrew and Jenkins, Bill (1995) ‘From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution?’, Public Administration73(1): 75–99.
54.
Gunn, Lewis (1987) ‘Perspectives on Public Management’, in J. Kooiman and K. Eliassen (eds) Managing Public Organizations: Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. London: Sage.
55.
Gutting, Gary (1980) ‘Introduction’, in G. Gutting (ed.) Paradigms and Revolutions. Appraisals and Application of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
56.
Haque, Shamsul (1996) ‘The Intellectual Crisis in Public Administration in the Current Epoch of Privatization’, Administration and Society27(4): 510–536.
57.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1944) The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Haywood, Stuart and Rodrigues, Jeff (1993) ‘A New Paradigm for Public Management?’, paper presented to the second international conference of Administrative Sciences, Toluca, Mexico, London: Office for Public Management.
59.
Henry, Nicholas (1975) ‘Paradigms of Public Administration’, Public Administration Review35(4): 378–385.
60.
Henry, Nicholas (1986) Public Administration and Public Affairs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61.
Hodgetts, J.E. (1973) The Canadian Public Service. A Physiology of Government, 1867–1970. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
62.
Hodgetts, J.E. (1997) ‘The Intellectual Odyssey of Public Administration in English Canada’, Canadian Public Administration40(2): 171–185.
63.
Hood, Christopher (1991) ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’, Public Administration69(1): 3–19.
64.
Hood, Christopher (1995) ‘Contemporary Public Management: A New Global Paradigm?’, Public Policy and Administration10(2): 104–117.
65.
Hood, Christopher (1996) ‘Beyond “Progressivism”: A New “Global Paradigm” in Public Management?’, International Journal of Public Management19(2): 151–177.
66.
Hood, Christopher (1998) The Art of the State. Culture, Rhetoric and Management. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
67.
Hood, Christopher and Jackson, Michael (1994) ‘Keys for Locks in Administrative Argument’, Administration and Society25(4): 467–488.
68.
Hughes, Owen (1994) Public Management and Administration. New York: St Martin’s Press.
69.
Hughes, Owen (1998) ‘New Public Management’, in Jay M. Shafritz (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, pp. 1489–1491. Boulder, CO: Westview.
70.
Humphrey, John (1939) ‘Judicial Control over Administrative Action with Special Reference to the Province of Quebec’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science5(3): 417–431.
71.
Jackson, Norman and Carter, Pippa (1991) ‘In Defense of Paradigm Incommensurability’, Organization Studies12(1): 109–127.
72.
Japan, Government of (1997) Gosei no Yakowari Wo Tomasu. Tokyo: Okurasho Shuppankyo.
73.
Kaboolian, Linda (1996) ‘Sociology’, in D.F. Kettl and H.B. Milward (eds) The State of Public Management, pp. 75–91. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
74.
Kaboolian, Linda (1998) ‘The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs Administration Debate’, Public Administraton Review58(3): 189–193.
75.
Kernaghan, Kenneth (1979) ‘Power, Parliament and Public Servants in Canada’, Canadian Public Policy5(3): 383–396.
76.
Kernaghan, Kenneth (1997) ‘Shaking the Foundation: New Versus Traditional Public-Service Values’, in M. Charih and A. Daniels (eds) New Public Management and Public Administration in Canada, pp. 47–64. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada and École nationale d’administration publique.
77.
Kernaghan, Kenneth and Siegel, David (1991) Public Administration in Canada. A Text. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.
78.
Kettl, Donald F. (1993) ‘Public Administration: The State of the Field’, in A.W. Finter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline, pp. 409–428. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
79.
Kirlin, John J. (1996) ‘The Big Questions of Public Administration in a Democracy’, Public Administration Review56(3): 416–423.
80.
Klingner, Donald E. (1996) ‘Public Personnel Management and Democratization: A View From Three Central American Republics’, Public Administration Review56(4): 390–399.
81.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Lambert Report (1979) Final Report of the Royal Commission on Financial Management and Accountability. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
83.
Lynn, Laurence E. (1994) ‘Public Management Research: The Triumph of Art Over Science’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13(2): 231–259.
84.
Lynn, Laurence E. (1996) Public Management as Art, Science and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham.
85.
Lynn, Laurence E. (1998) ‘The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy’, Public Administration Review58(3): 231–237.
86.
Mandelbaum, Maurice (1977) ‘A Note on Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, The Monist60(4): 445–452.
87.
March, Artemis (1997) ‘Old European Ontology: Unlocking Quantum Systems Beneath Our Dead Sociologies’, in J. Marler (ed.) From the Realm of the Ancestors. An Anthology in Honor of Marija Gimbutas, pp. 356–370. Manchester: Knowledge, Ideas and Trends Inc.
88.
Marini, Frank (ed.) (1971) Toward a New Public Administration. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
89.
Marshall, Gary (1998) ‘In Search of Commensurability: Writings in Public Management in an Era of Governmental Reform’, Public Administration Review58(3): 274–279.
90.
Masterman, Margaret (1970) ‘The Nature of a Paradigm’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 59–89. London: Cambridge University Press.
91.
McCurdy, Howard E. (1972) Public Administration: A Bibliography. Washington, DC: College of Public Affairs, The American University.
92.
McCurdy, Howard E. and Cleary, Robert E. (1984) ‘Why Can’t We Solve the Research Issue in Public Administration?’, Public Administration Review44(1): 49–55.
93.
McSwite, O.C. (1997) Legitimacy in Public Administration. A Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94.
Milward, H. Brinton (1996) ‘Conclusion: What is Public Management?’, in D.J. Kettl and H.B. Milward (eds) The State of Public Management, pp. 307–312. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
95.
Minogue, Martin (1983) ‘Theory and Practice in Public Policy and Administration’, Policy and Politics11(1): 63–85.
96.
Mintzberg, Henry (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
97.
Moe, Ronald C. (1994) ‘The ‘Reinventing Government’ Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences’, Public Administration Review54(2): 111–122.
98.
Neumann, Francis X. Jr (1996) ‘What Makes Public Administration a Science? Are its Questions Really Big?’, Public Administration Review56(5): 109–115.
99.
Niskanen, William A. Jr (1971) Bureaucracy and Collective Action. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.
100.
Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1993) Managing with Market-Type Mechanisms. Paris: OECD.
102.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1995) Governance in Transition. Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
103.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996) Integrating People into Public Service Reform. Paris: OECD.
104.
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
105.
Ostrom, Vincent (1989) The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, 2nd edn.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
106.
Ouchi, William G. (1981) Theory Z. How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. New York: Avon Books.
107.
Overman, E. Sam and Boyd, Kathy J. (1994) ‘Best Practice Research and Postbureaucratic Reform’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory4(1): 67–83.
108.
Payette, Adrien (1994) ‘Éléments pour une conception du management public’, in R. Parenteau (ed.) Management Public. Comprendre et gérer les institutions de l’État, pp. 3–24. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Perry, James L. (1993) ‘Public Management Theory: What Is It? What Should It Be?’, in B. Bozeman (ed.) Public Management. The State of the Art, pp. 16–18. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
109.
Perry, James L. and Kraemer, Kenneth L. (1991) ‘The Roots of Public Management’, in J. S. Ott et al. (eds) Public Management. The Essential Readings, pp. 5–9. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Book/Nelson-Hall.
110.
Peters, Guy and Savoie, Donald (eds) (1995) Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal: Canadian Centre for Management Development and McGill-Queen’s University Press.
111.
Peters, Thomas (1992) Liberation Management. New York: A.A. Knopf.
112.
Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1982) In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
113.
Pollitt, Christopher (1990) Managerialism and the Public Service. The Anglo-American Experience. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
114.
Rainey, Hal G. (1991) Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
115.
Rainey, Hal. G. (1994) ‘On Paradigms, Progress and Prospects for Public Management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory4(1): 41–48.
116.
Ramos, Albert Guerreiro (1978) ‘Misplacement of Concepts and Administrative Theory’, Public Administration Review38(6): 550–557.
117.
Reingold, Nathan (1980) ‘Through Paradigm-Land to a Normal History of Science’, Social Studies of Science10(4): 475–496.
118.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1994) ‘Reinventing Excellence: Or How Best-Sellers Thwart the Search for Lessons to Transform the Public Sector’, Public Administration72(2): 281–289.
119.
Rowe, Alan J. and Mason, Richard O. (1987) Managing With Style. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
120.
Saint-Martin, Denis (1999) ‘Les consultants et la réforme managérialiste de l’État en France et en Grande Bretagne: vers l’émergence d’une “consultocratie”?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science22(1): 41–74.
121.
Savoie, Donald (1995) ‘What is Wrong with the New Public Management?’, Canadian Public Administration38(1): 112–121.
122.
Scheurer, Paul (1994) ‘Kuhn, Thomas S., 1922–’, Dictionnaire des philosophes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
123.
Schmidt, Mary R. (1994) ‘Grout: Alternatives Kinds of Knowledge and Why They Are Ignored’, in J.D. White and G.B. Adams (eds) Research in Public Administration. Reflections on Theory and Practice, pp. 213–224. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage and ASPA.
124.
Silberman, Bernard S. (1993) Cages of Reason. The Rise and Fall of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States and Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
125.
Sinclair, Amanda (1994) ‘Review of D. Osborne and T. Gaebler (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transorming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley’, Australian Journal of Public Administration53(2): 267–268.
126.
Stengers, Isabelle (1973) ‘La description de Kuhn et son application à la biologie contemporaine’, Annales de l’Institut de philosophie: 179–226.
127.
Sterman, John D. (1985) ‘The Growth of Knowledge: Testing a Theory of Scientific Revolution with a Formal Model’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change28(2): 93–122.
128.
Sutherland, Sharon L. (1991) ‘Responsible Government and Ministerial Responsibility: Every Reform Is Its Own Problem’, Canadian Journal of Political Science24(1): 91–120.
129.
Tellier, Paul (1992) First Annual Report to the Prime Minister on the Public Service of Canada. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
130.
Terry, Larry D. (1998) ‘Leadership, Neo-Managerialism and the New Public Management Movement’, Public Administration Review58(3): 194–200.
131.
Thomas, Paul (1996a) ‘Beyond the Buzzwords: Coping with Change in the Public Sector’, International Review of Administrative Science62(1): 5–36.
132.
Thomas, Paul (1996b) ‘Visions Versus Resources in the Federal Program Review’, in Amelita Armit and Jacques Bourgault (eds) Hard Choices or No Choices: Assessing Program Review, pp. 39–46. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada and Canadian Plains Research Centre.
133.
Trebilcock, Michael , Hartel, D.F., Pritchard, J.R.S. and Dewees, D.N. (1982) The Choice of Governing Instrument. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada, Supply and Services.
134.
Tschannen, Olivier (1994) ‘Paradigms and Exemplars in Sociology: A Kuhnian Reformulation’, Revue suisse de sociologie20(2): 463–486.
135.
Tullock, Gordon (1965) The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
136.
van de Vall, Mark and Bolas, Cheryl (1980) ‘Applied Social Discipline Research or Social Policy Research: The Emergence of a Professional Paradigm in Sociological Research’, The American Sociologist15(3): 128–137.
137.
Walker, Michael (1988) ‘Preface’, in M.A. Walker (ed.) Privatization: Tactics and Techniques. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
138.
Weimer, David L. (1992) ‘Political Science, Practitioner Skill and Public Management’, Public Administration Review52(3): 240–246.
139.
Weinberg, Martha Wagner (1983) ‘Public Management and Private Management: A Diminishing Gap?’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management3(1): 107–125.
140.
Weiss, Janet (1994) ‘Public Management and the Interdependence of Theory and Research’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13(2): 278–285.
141.
Whicker, Marcia L. , Strickland, Ruth A. and Olfshski, Dorothy (1993) ‘The Troublesome Cleft: Public Administration and Political Science’, Public Administration Review53(6): 531–541.
142.
Wilding, Paul (1992) ‘The British Welfare State: Thatcherism’s Enduring Legacy’, Policy and Politics20: 201–212.
143.
Willis, John (1961) ‘Administrative Law in Canada’, Canadian Bar Review39: 251–265.
