Algemene Rekenkamer (1989) Algemene Rekenkamer: Past, Present and
Future. The Hague:
Algemene Rekenkamer.
2.
Algemene Rekenkamer (1996)
Manual on Performance Audit. (English language
version on the Algemene Rekenkamer web-site.)
3.
Bowerman, M. (1996) ‘The Rise and Fall of Value for Money
Auditing’, in I. Lapsley and F. Mitchell (eds) Accounting and Performance Measurement — Issues in the Private
and Public Sectors.
London.
4.
Goldsworthy, D. (1996) ‘The Highways Agency’s Bridge Programme: Lessons
Learned from a VFM Study’, paper prepared for the UK
Evaluation Society annual conference, London,
19–20September 1996.
Keen, J. (1998) ‘The Audit Nexus: Shaping Performance
Audit’, paper presented at the European Institute for
Advanced Studies in Management conference,
Venice, September.
7.
Kraan, A. and Rozendaal, P. (1997) ‘Using Evaluations in Performance Auditing: The Case of
The Netherlands Court of Audit’, paper presented to the
European Evaluation Society Conference,
Stockholm, 6–8 March.
8.
National Audit Office (1993) ‘Accounting for Inflation in Defence
Procurement’. London:
HMSO.
9.
National Audit Office (1996a) ‘State Audit in the European Union’.
London: National Audit
Office.
10.
National Audit Office (1996b) ‘Focus Groups: How to Apply the Technique to VFM
work’. London: National
Audit Office.
11.
National Audit Office (1997a) ‘Designing VFM Studies: A Guide’.
London: National Audit
Office.
12.
National Audit Office (1997b) ‘Benchmarking: How Benchmarking Can Help in VFM
Examinations’. London:
National Audit Office.
13.
National Audit Office (1998a) ‘Striving to Achieve More: Improving the
Financial Impact of Our Work’, Guidance for VFM
staff. London: National
Audit Office.
14.
National Audit Office (1998b) ‘Annual Report’.
London: National Audit
Office.
15.
National Audit Office (1998c) ‘International Value for Money Methods
Seminar’, Report of seminar held on 29–30 September.
London: National Audit
Office.
16.
National Audit Office (1999) ‘Getting Beneath the Surface: A Handbook for
Using Qualitative Evidence for Value for Money Examinations’.
London: National Audit
Office.
17.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997), ‘Realistic Evaluation’.
London: SAGE
Publications.
18.
Pollitt, C. and Summa, H. (1996) ‘Performance Audit and Evaluation: Similar
Tools Different Relationships?’, in C. Wisler (ed.) Evaluation and Auditing: Prospects for Convergence
(special issue of New Directions for Evaluation 71(Fall)). San
Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
19.
Pollitt, C. and Summa, H. (1997) ‘Reflexive Watchdogs? How Supreme Audit
Institutions Account for Themselves’, Public
Administration, 75(2):
313–336.
20.
Pollitt, C. , Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. and Waerness, M. (1999) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and
Public Management in Five Countries.
Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
21.
Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society.
Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
22.
Public Audit Forum (1999) ‘Implications for Audit of the Modernising
Government Agenda: A Paper by the Public Audit Forum’.
London: Public Audit
Forum.
23.
Riksrevisionsverket (1992) ‘Human Resource Management in a Perspective of
Change’. Stockholm:
Swedish National Audit Bureau.
24.
Riksrevisionsverket (1993) ‘Performance Auditing at the Swedish National
Audit Bureau’. Stockholm:
Swedish National Audit Bureau.
25.
Riksrevisionsverket (1996a) ‘Annual Report and Accounts 1995/96’.
Stockholm:
Riksrevisionsverket.
26.
Riksrevisionsverket (1996b) Handbook in Performance Auditing — Theory and
Practice. Stockholm:
Swedish National Audit Office.
27.
Riksrevisionsverket (1998) ‘Illicit Work in Sweden — A Report on a Welfare
State Dilemma’. Stockholm:
Swedish National Audit Office.
28.
Roberts, S. and Pollitt, C. (1994) ‘Audit or Evaluation? A National Audit
Office Value for Money Study’, Public
Administration72(4):
527–549.
