Aucoin, Peter (1998) ‘Auditing for Accountability: The Role of
the Auditor General’, Occasional Paper.
Ottawa: Institute on
Governance.
2.
Auditor General of Canada (1999) ‘Collaborative Arrangements: Issue for the
Federal Government’, Report of the Auditor General of
Canada to the House of Commons, Chapter 5.
Ottawa.
3.
Barzelay, Michael (1997) ‘Central Audit Institutions and
Performance Auditing: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Strategies in the
OECD’, Governance10(3):
235–260.
4.
Behn, Robert D. (1998) ‘The New Public Management Paradigm and
the Search for Democratic Accountability’, International
Public Management Journal1(2):
131–164.
5.
Campbell, Colin and Wilson, G. (1995) The End of Whitehall: A Comparative
Perspective. Cambridge, MA:
Blackwell.
6.
Canada (1997) ‘A Strong
Foundation: The Report of the Task Force on Public Service Values and Ethics’.
Ottawa.
7.
Cooper, Philip J. (1995) ‘Accountability and Administrative Reform:
Toward Convergence and Beyond’, in B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoie (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment.
Montreal/Kingston. Canadian Centre
for Management Development/McGill-Queen’s University
Press.
8.
Gregory, Robert (1998) ‘A New Zealand Tragedy: Problems of
Political Responsibility’, Governance11(2):
231–240.
9.
Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard.
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School
Press.
10.
Kettl, Donald F. (1994) Reinventing Government: Appraising the National
Performance Review. Washington DC:
Brookings Institution.
11.
Mulgan, Richard (1997) ‘The Processes of Public
Accountability’, Australian Journal of Public
Administration56(1):
25–36.
12.
Peters, B. Guy and Savoie, Donald J. (eds) (1995) Governance in a Changing
Environment. Montreal/Kingston:
Canadian Centre for Management Development/McGill-Queen’s
University Press.
13.
Polidano, Charles (1999) ‘The Bureaucrat Who Fell Under a Bus:
Ministerial Responsibility, Executive Agencies and the Derek Lewis Affair in
Britain’, Governance12(2):
201–229.
14.
Schick, Allen (1996) ‘The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New
Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change’, a report prepared for
the State Services Commission and the Treasury, New Zealand.
Wellington: State Services
Commission.
15.
Stone, Bruce (1995) ‘Administrative Accountability in the
Westminster Democracies: Toward a Conceptual Framework’,
Governance8(4):
505–526.
16.
Sutherland, S.L. (1991) ‘The Al-Mashat Affair: Administrative
Responsibility in Parliamentary Institutions’, Canadian
Public Administration34(4):
573–603.
17.
Sutherland, Sharon (1996) ‘Does Westminster Government Have a
Future?’, Occasional Paper.
Ottawa: Institute on
Governance.
18.
The Economist (1998) 8 August.
19.
Thomas, Paul (1998) ‘The Changing Nature of
Accountability’, in B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoie (eds) Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, pp.
348–393.
Montreal/Kingston: Canadian Centre
for Management Development/McGill-Queen’s University
Press.
