The scholarship on charismatic leadership is interdisciplinary and rapidly evolving. This recent growth is accentuated in liberal democracies where populist parties have been enjoying increasing electoral success. We start this overview with basic definitions of charismatic leadership, then identify three main trends in the current scholarship. Following this, we highlight potential future research avenues and focuses that we believe still lack systematic investigation. The findings collectively highlight the complex nature of charismatic leadership across different political contexts, its mechanisms of influence, succession challenges, and institutional implications. The research demonstrates both the powerful appeal of charismatic leadership and its potential risks to democratic governance. Altogether, this overview is timely given worldwide political developments, and can serve not only as a summary and assessment of current scholarship, but also as a starting point for an extended exploration of additional aspects of charismatic leadership that can combine and cut across disciplinary boundaries.
AhmedS. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AltmanD. (2020). Checking executive personalism: Collegial governments and the level of democracy. Swiss Political Science Review. 26(3), 316-338 [Abstr. 71.3277].
3.
Andrews-LeeC. (2019a). The power of charisma: Investigating the neglected citizenpolitical linkage in Hugo Chavez's Venezuela. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 11(3), 298-322 [Abstr. 71.3700].
4.
Andrews-LeeC. (2019b). The revival of charisma: Experimental evidence from Argentina and Venezuela. Comparative Political Studies, 52(5), 687-719. DOI: 10.1177/0010414018797952
5.
Andrews-LeeC. (2020). The politics of succession in charismatic movements. Comparative Politics, 52(2), 289-310 [Abstr. 70.3449].
6.
Andrews-LeeC.GamboaL. (2022). When handpicked successors of charismatic leaders prosper: The surprising success of Juan Manuel Santos in Colombia. Democratization, 29(6), 1116-1136. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2022.2033971 [Abstr. 72.7272]
7.
BarisioneM. (2023). Reviving metapersonal charisma in Max Weber. Political Theory, 51(3), 530-556. DOI: 10.1177/00905917221129632 [Abstr. 74.3252]
8.
BelloW.F. (2020). A dangerous liaison? Harnessing Weber to illuminate the relationship of democracy and charisma in the Philippines and India. International Sociology, 35(6), 691-709. DOI: 10.1177/0268580920942721 [Abstr. 72.606]
9.
BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C.MeindlJ. R. (2004). Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2), 211-239.
10.
BonoJ. E.IliesR. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317-334.
11.
BrunkertL.von SoestC. (2023). Praising the leader: Personalist legitimation strategies and the deterioration of executive constraints. Democratization. 30(3), 419-439. [Abstr. 73.4428]
12.
CongerJ.A. (2012). 21 Charismatic leadership. In RumseyM.G. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership. Oxford University Press.
13.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647.
14.
CrutzenB.S.Y.FlamandS. (2023). Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success. European Journal of Political Economy, 80(102450), 1-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102450 [Abstr. 74.3537]
15.
De la TorreC. (Ed.) (2018). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. Routledge.
16.
DestradiS.CadierD.PlagemannJ. (2021). Populism and foreign policy: A research agenda (Introduction), Comparative European Politics19(6), 663-682.
17.
DuvergerM. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Methuen.
18.
FaveroA. (2021). Charisma in right-wing populism: Comparing the view of the leader and followers within the Swiss People's Party. Swiss Political Science Review, 28, 477-495. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12510 [Abstr. 73.2122]
19.
FouquetS.BrummerK. (2023). Profiling the personality of populist foreign policy makers: A leadership trait analysis. Journal of International Relations and Development26(1), 1-29. [Abstr. 73.3450]
20.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
21.
GiurlandoPWajnerD. F. (Eds.) (2023). Populist Foreign Policy: Regional Perspectives of Populism in the International Scene. Springer.
22.
Grzymala-BusseA. (2017). Global populisms and their impact. Slavic Review76(S1), 3-8.
23.
HadizV. R.ChryssogelosA. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review38(4), 399-411. [Abstr. 68.737]
24.
HarmelR.SvåsandL. (1993). Party leadership and party institutionalisation: Three phases of development. West European Politics, 16(2), 67-88. [Abstr. 43.5932]
25.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
26.
HollyerJ.R.KlašnjaM.TitiunikR. (2022). Parties as disciplinarians: Charisma and commitment problems in programmatic campaigning. American Journal of Political Science, 66(1), 75-92. [Abstr. 72.3583]
27.
HowellJ. M.ShamirB. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96-112.
28.
HumphreyR. H. (2002). The many faces of emotional leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 493-504.
29.
InglehartR. F.NorrisP. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Working Papers Series.
30.
JandaK. (1980). Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. Free Press.
31.
JoosseP.ZelinskyD. (2022). Berserk!: Anger and the charismatic populism of Donald Trump. Critical Sociology, 48(6), 1073-1087. DOI: 10.1177/08969205211063131 [Abstr. 73.2199]
32.
JowittK. (1992). New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. University of California Press.
33.
KellermanB. (2008). Followership: How Followers are Creating Change and Changing Leaders. Harvard Business Press.
34.
KitscheltH. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6-7), 845-879. [Abstr. 51.157]
35.
KleinK. J.HouseR. J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 183-198.
36.
LacatusC.MeibauerG.LöfflmannG. (2023). Political Communication and Performative Leadership: Populism in International Politics. Springer.
37.
LequesneC. (2021). Populist governments and career diplomats in the EU: The challenge of political capture. Comparative European Politics, 19(6), 779-795. [Abstr. 72.2157]
38.
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How Democracies Die. Broadway Books.
39.
LindholmC. (1988). Lovers and leaders: Comparative models of romance and charisma. Social Science Information, 27(1), 3-45.
40.
LodgeT. (2014). Neo-patrimonial Politics in the ANC. African Affairs, 113(450), 1-23. [Abstr. 64.3534]
41.
LöfflmannG. (2022). Introduction to special issue: The study of populism in international relations, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(3), 403-415. [Abstr. 72.7741]
42.
MainwaringS.ScullyT. R. (Eds.) (1995). Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press.
43.
MeindlJ. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329-341.
44.
MoffittB. (2010). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford University Press.
45.
MuddeC.KaltwasserC. R. (Eds.) (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?Cambridge University Press.
46.
MüllerJ.-W. (2017). What is Populism?Penguin.
47.
NaiA.ComaF.M. (2019). The personality of populists: Provocateurs, charismatic leaders, or drunken dinner guests?. West European Politics, 42(7), 1337-1367. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1599570 [Abstr. 70.660]
48.
PanebiancoA. (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge University Press.
49.
PappasT. S. (2011). Political charisma revisited, and reclaimed for political science. EUI Working Papers.
50.
ReicherS.HopkinsN. (2001). Self and Nation: Categorization, Contestation and Mobilization. Sage Publications.
51.
RobertsK. M. (2006). Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America. Comparative politics, 38(2), 127-148. [Abstr. 57.876]
52.
RouhiM.SnowJ. L. (2019). Decision-making in revolutionary states: Beyond the whims of charismatic leaders. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(4), 448-463. [Abstr. 70.4926]
53.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
54.
SmithJ. M. (2000). Creating and maintaining political spectacle: Charismatic authority and the role of performance. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 86(2), 99-112.
55.
StengelF. A.MacDonaldD. B.NabersD. (2019). Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter-and Transnational Dimensions. Palgrave-Macmillan.
56.
StockemerD. (Ed.) (2019). Populism around the World. Springer.
57.
SubediD.B.ScottA. (2021). Populism, authoritarianism, and charismatic-plebiscitary leadership in contemporary Asia: A comparative perspective from India and Myanmar. Comparative Politics, 27(5), 387-507, DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2021.1917162 [Abstr. 72.3834]
58.
SyT.CôtéS.SaavedraR. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295-305.
59.
TortolaP.D.PansardiP. (2019). The charismatic leadership of the ECB presidency: A language-based analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 58, 96-116. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12272 [Abstr. 69.4143]
60.
VerbeekB.ZazloveA. (2017). Populism and foreign policy. In Rovira-KaltwasserC., et al. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 384-405). Oxford University Press.
61.
VisnovitzP.JenneE. K. (2021). Populist argumentation in foreign policy: The case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010-2020. Comparative European Politics, 19, 683-702. [Abstr. 72.2333]
62.
WajnerD. F. (2021). Making (Latin) America great again: Lessons from populist foreign policies in the Americas. In StengelF.MacDonaldD.NabersD. (Eds.), Populism and World Politics (pp. 195-225). Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
WareA. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford University Press.
64.
WasielewskiP. L. (1985). The emotional basis of charisma. Symbolic Interaction, 8(2), 207-222.
65.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. RothG.WittichC. (Eds.), 3 Vols. University of California Press. (Original work published posthumously 1921-1922).
66.
WeberMax. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. (HendersonA. M.ParsonsT., trans., ParsonsT., Ed.). Free Press.
67.
WehnerL.ThiesC. G. (2021). The nexus of populism and foreign policy: The case of Latin America, International Relations, 35(2), 320-340. [Abstr. 72.949]
68.
WeylandK. (2013). Latin America's authoritarian drift: The threat from the populist left. Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 18-32 [Abstr. 63.7563]
69.
ZelinskyD. (2021). Charisma and social phenomenology: Gerda Walther, Herman Schmalenbach and Aron Gurwitsch. Journal of Classical Sociology, 23(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/1468795X211049626 [Abstr. 73.6065]
