The recent interest in recovery from mental health problems has not meaningfully addressed the perspectives of ethnic minorities.
Aim:
To contribute to the discussion of recovery-oriented service with a study on the experience of Chinese people using UK mental health services.
Methods:
In-depth life history interviews were carried out with the users. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results:
Four themes emerged as hindrances to personal recovery: (1) language difficulty creates hurdles, (2) diagnostic label is experienced as a double-edged sword, (3) treatment-related stigma and (dis)empowerment are identified, and (4) grievances are found in hospitalisation.
Discussion:
Having mental illness and being an ethnic minority in the UK experienced double hazard in their recovery journey. While the deprivation of agency and the stigma process in the health care system hinders their recovery, they are further disadvantaged by their ethnic minority status. Four pointers for service improvement, that apply to Chinese users in the United Kingdom and have general implications for users beyond this group, are proposed.
AnthonyW. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 11–23.
2.
BonningtonO.RoseD. (2014). Exploring stigmatisation among people diagnosed with either bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder: A critical realist analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 123, 7–17.
3.
ColemanR. (2004). Recovery: An alien concept?Wormit: P&P Press.
4.
CorriganP. W.MarkowitzF. E.WatsonA. C. (2004). Structural levels of mental illness stigma and discrimination. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 481–491.
5.
DavidsonL.RidgwayP.WielandM.O’ConnellM. (2009). A capabilities approach to mental health transformation: A conceptual framework for the recovery era. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 8, 35–46.
6.
DeeganP. E. (2007). The lived experience of using psychiatric medication in the recovery process and a shared decision-making program to support it. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 62–79.
7.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research, 7, 327–353.
8.
ElderG. H.JohnsonM. K.CrosnoeR. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In MortimerJ.T.ShanahanM.J. (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
10.
GreenG.BradbyH.ChanA.LeeN.EldridgeK. (2002). Is the English National Health Service meeting the needs of mentally distressed Chinese women?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7, 216–221.
11.
GreenhalgnT.RobbN.ScamblerG. (2006). Communicative and strategic action in interpreted consultations in primary health care: A Habermasian perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1170–1187.
12.
IdaD. J. (2007). Cultural competency and recovery within diverse populations. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 49–53.
13.
JutelA. (2011). Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. In McGannP.J.HutsonD.J. (Eds.), Sociology of diagnosis: Advances in medical sociology (vol. 12, pp. 3–32). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
14.
KalathilJ.BhaktaR.DanielO.JosephD.TrivediP. (2011). Recovery and resilience: African, African-Caribbean and South Asian women’s narratives of recovering from mental distress. London, England: Mental Health Foundation.
15.
KarpD. A. (1994). Living with depression: Illness and identity turning points. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 6–30.
16.
KleinmanA. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
17.
LinkB. G.PhelanJ. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.
18.
PilgrimD. (2008). ‘Recovery’ and current mental health policy. Chronic Illness, 4, 95–304.
19.
RobertsG. A. (2000). Narrative and severe mental illness: What place do stories have in an evidence-based world?Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6, 432–441.
20.
SladeM. (2009). Personal recovery and mental illness: A guide for mental health professionals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Southside Partnership/Fanon. (2008). Report of the community led research project focusing on male African and African Caribbean perspectives on recovery. London, England: NIMHE.
22.
SrivastavaP.HopwoodN. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 76–84.
23.
TangL. (2017). Recovery, mental health and inequality: Chinese ethnic minorities as mental health service users. London, New York: Routledge
24.
TranL.WongC.YungJ.LamJ. (2008). Report of the community led research project focusing on the mental health service needs of Chinese elders in Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea and Brent. London, England: The Chinese National Healthy Living Centre.
25.
TseS.CheungE.KanA.NgR.YauS. (2012). Recovery in Hong Kong: Service user participation in mental health services. International Review of Psychiatry, 24, 40–47.
26.
TseS.NgR. M. (2014). Applying a mental health recovery approach for people from diverse backgrounds: The case of collectivism and individualism paradigms. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 1, 7–13.
27.
YeungE. Y. W.IrvineF.NgS. M.TsangS. K. (2012). Role of social networks in the help-seeking experiences among Chinese suffering from severe mental illness in England: A qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 486–503.
28.
YoungI. M. (1992). Five faces of oppression. In WartenbergT. (Ed.), Rethinking power. Albany: State University of New York Press, 174–195.
