The social and community opportunities profile social inclusion measure: Structural equivalence and differential item functioning in community mental health residents in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom

Abstract

Introduction:

China’s future major health problem will be the management of chronic diseases – of which mental health is a major one. An instrument is needed to measure mental health inclusion outcomes for mental health services in Hong Kong and mainland China as they strive to promote a more inclusive society for their citizens and particular disadvantaged groups.

Aim:

To report on the analysis of structural equivalence and item differentiation in two mentally unhealthy and one healthy sample in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong.

Method:

The mental health sample in Hong Kong was made up of non-governmental organisation (NGO) referrals meeting the selection/exclusion criteria (being well enough to be interviewed, having a formal psychiatric diagnosis and living in the community). A similar sample in the United Kingdom meeting the same selection criteria was obtained from a community mental health organisation, equivalent to the NGOs in Hong Kong. Exploratory factor analysis and logistic regression were conducted.

Results:

The single-variable, self-rated ‘overall social inclusion’ differs significantly between all of the samples, in the way we would expect from previous research, with the healthy population feeling more included than the serious mental illness (SMI) groups. In the exploratory factor analysis, the first two factors explain between a third and half of the variance, and the single variable which enters into all the analyses in the first factor is having friends to visit the home. All the regression models were significant; however, in Hong Kong sample, only one-fifth of the total variance is explained.

Conclusion:

The structural findings imply that the social and community opportunities profile–Chinese version (SCOPE-C) gives similar results when applied to another culture. As only one-fifth of the variance of ‘overall inclusion’ was explained in the Hong Kong sample, it may be that the instrument needs to be refined using different or additional items within the structural domains of inclusion.

Keywords

Severe mental illness social exclusion health assessment social policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumgartner

J. N.

Burns

J. K.

(2014). Measuring social inclusion – A key outcome in global mental health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, 354–364. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt224

Berg

Jahnsen

Holm

Hussain

(2003). Translation of a multi-disciplinary assessment – Procedures to achieve functional equivalence. Advances in Physiotherapy, 5(2), 57–66.

Blaxland

Fisher

K. R.

Shang

(2015). Transitional and developmental challenges for Chinese social policy. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 9, 1–2. doi:10.1111/aswp.12047

Borge

Martinsen

E. W.

Ruud

Watne

Friis

(1999). Quality of life, loneliness, and social contact among long-term psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 50, 81–84. doi:10.1176/ps.50.1.81

Boushey

Fremstad

Gragg

Waller

(2007). Social inclusion for the USA: Advocating the use of the concept in the USA. Available at: www.inclusionist.org/files/socialinclusionusa.pdf

Bowden

Fox-Rushby

J. A.

(2003). A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1289–1306.

Chan

Chiu

Evans

Huxley

P. J.

Y. L.

(2015b). Application of SCOPE-C to measure social inclusion among mental health services users in Hong Kong. Community Mental Health Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10597-015-9907-z

Chan

Evans

Chiu

Huxley

P. J.

Y. L.

(2014a). Relationship between health, experience of discrimination, and social inclusion among mental health service users in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 124(1), 127–139.

Chan

Evans

Y. L.

Chiu

Huxley

(2014b). A concept mapping study on social inclusion in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 119, 121–137.

10.

Chan

Huxley

P. J.

Chiu

Evans

(2015a). Social inclusion and health conditions among Chinese immigrants in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: An exploratory study. Social Indicators Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0910-0

11.

Cheung

Y. B.

Thumboo

(2006). Developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for use in Asia: The issues. Pharmacoeconomics, 24, 643–650.

12.

Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Social policy agenda: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

13.

Coombs

Nicholas

Pirkis

(2013). A review of social inclusion measures. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 906–919. doi:10.1177/0004867413491161

14.

Council for the European Union. (2003). Joint report by the Commission and the Council on social inclusion. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

15.

Cullinane

(2002). The relationship between car ownership and public transport provision: A case study of Hong Kong. Transport Policy, 9, 29–39.

16.

Cullinane

(2003). Car dependence in a public transport dominated city: Evidence from Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8, 129–138.

17.

Curran

Burchardt

Knapp

Mcdaid

(2007). Changes in multidisciplinary systematic reviewing: A study on social exclusion and mental health policy. Social Policy and Administration, 1, 289–312.

18.

Fischer

Fontaine

J. R. J.

(2011). Methods for investigating structural equivalence. In Matsumoto

Vijver

(Eds.), Cross cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 179–215). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Fisher

Jing

(2008). Chinese disability independent living policy. Disability and Society, 23, 171–185.

20.

Gordon

(2000). Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

21.

Herdman

Fox-Rushby

Badia

(1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 7, 323–335.

22.

Huxley

Evans

Madge

Webber

Burchardt

McDaid

Knapp

(2012). Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): Psychometric development study. Health Technology Assessment, 16, iii–vii, ix–xii, 1–241. doi:10.3310/hta16010

23.

Johnson

T. P.

Shavitt

Holbrook

A. L.

(2011). Survey response styles across cultures. In Matsumoto

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

(Eds.), Cross cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 130–178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Lee

J. W.

Jung

D. Y.

(2006). Measurement issues across different cultures. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36, 1295–1300.

25.

Leff

Warner

(2006). Social inclusion of people with mental illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Luhrmann

T. M.

(2014, December 15). Wheat people vs. rice people – Association for Psychological Science. International New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/wheat-people-vs-rice-people.html

27.

Mahler

Jank

Reuschenbach

Szecsenyi

(2009). ‘Let’s quickly translate this questionnaire’ – Guidelines for translation and implementation of English-language assessment instruments. Pflegewissenschaft, 13(1), 5–12.

28.

Matsumoto

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

(Eds.). (2011). Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Mental Health Europe. (2008). From exclusion to inclusion: The way forward to promoting social inclusion of people with mental health problems in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Mental Health Europe.

30.

Repper

Perkins

(2003). Social inclusion and recovery: A model for mental health practice. London, England: Baillière Tindall.

31.

Steele

Lynch

S. M.

(2013). The pursuit of happiness in China: Individualism, collectivism, and subjective well-being during China’s economic and social transformation. Social Indicators Research, 114, 441–451.

32.

Streiner

D. L.

Norman

G. R.

(2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

33.

Thoits

P. A.

(2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145–161. doi:10.1177/0022146510395592

34.

Townsend

(1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

35.

Tran

T. V.

(2009). Developing cross cultural measurement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

36.

Ungvari

Chiu

H. F. K.

(2004). The state of psychiatry in Hong Kong: A bird’s eye view. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 50, 5–9.

37.

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Leung

(2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

(Eds.), Cross cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 33–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Van Widenfelt

B. M.

Treffers

P. D.

De Beurs

Siebelink

B. M.

Koudijs

. (2005). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8, 135–147.

39.

Wang

Marquez

Langenbrunner

(2011). Toward a healthy and harmonious life in China: Stemming the rising tide of non-communicable diseases. Human Development Unit, The World Bank, Washington.

40.

Willgerodt

M. A.

Kataoka-Yahiro

Kim

Ceria

(2005). Issues of instrument translation in research on Asian immigrant populations. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21, 231–239.

41.

World Health Organization. (2008). mhGAP: Mental health gap action programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap_final_english.pdf

42.

Wright

Stickley

(2013). Concepts of social inclusion, exclusion and mental health: A review of the international literature. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(1), 71–81.