The Brazilian state apparatus was reformed throughout the 1990s, influenced by New Public Management (NPM). NPM was embodied in the health care sector by the creation of Social Health Organizations (Organizações Sociais de Saúde or OSS), private non-profit entities to provide welfare services. We performed a systematic review of the literature outlining the origins and role of OSS in Brazil. Our selected articles (peer-reviewed) cover the origins/performance of OSS and their services provision between 1998 and 2018, in English or Portuguese. Databases used were Lilacs, Bireme, Medline, Pubmed, and SciELO. We identified 4,732 articles applying a pre-defined set of descriptors, from which we selected 49 for analysis. The main findings reveal that NPM is the central theme of most articles about OSS in Brazil (n = 26). There is evidence corroborating our hypothesis that transferring management of public health care services to private non-profit organizations is a softer version of privatization as, although financing is kept public, the rationale and ethos of OSS services institutionally and operationally mimic the private sector. The practical consequence is that attainment of health care in Brazil ends up being neither fully commodified (based on ability to pay) nor fulfilled as a citizen’s right following its national constitution.
BrandãoAdOSilvaAdOGuadagninLA. From the origins of the state to the advent of the third sector. ENANPAD 98: 22§ Meeting of ANPAD, Foz do Iguaçu; 1998.
2.
SantosBdS.The Solidarity and Participatory Reinvention of the State. Coimbra, Portugal:
Centro de Estudos Sociais – CES; 1999.
3.
BlairT.The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century. London, England:
Fabian Society; 1998.
4.
GiddensA.The Third Way.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
Record; 1998.
5.
GiddensA.The Global Debate on the Third Way.
São Paulo, Brazil:
Unesp; 2007.
6.
SiqueiraCEBorgesFT. Inventing the reinvented: Social Health Organizations as a model of neoliberal management of health services to Bresser-Pereira. In: Sodré F, Bussinguer ECdA, Bahia L, eds. Social Organizations: Political Agenda and Costs for the Public Health Sector. Vol 1. São Paulo, Brazil: Hucitec; 2018:364.
7.
OsborneD.Reinventing Government - How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. 5th ed.
Brasilian:
Mh Comunicação; 1995.
8.
HarveyD.A Brief History of Neoliberalism.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press; 2007.
BrittanS.Capitalism With a Human Face.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1996.
11.
BambraCFoxDScott-SamuelA.Towards a politics of health. Health Promot Int. 2005;
20(2):187–193.
12.
WallersteinIM.Historical Capitalism: With Capitalist civilization.
London, England:
Verso Trade; 2011.
13.
MooneyG.The Health of Nations: Towards a New Political Economy.
London, England:
Zed Books Ltd.; 2012.
14.
WaltonM.Neoliberalism in Latin America: good, bad, or incomplete?Latin Am Res Rev. 2004;
39(3):165–183.
15.
MontañoC.From “logics of the State” to “logics of civil society”: State and “third sector” in question. Serv Soc Soc. 1999;
59:47–79.
16.
MeloMPdLessaSEdC.
Healthcare politics, neoliberal project and the growth of the third sector: an analysis of the FASFIL from de healthcare field in Censo IBGE 2005. Text Context (Porto Alegre). 2017;
16(1):262–274.
17.
DunnWNMillerDY.A critique of the new public management and the neo-Weberian state: advancing a critical theory of administrative reform.Public Org Rev. 2007;
7(4):345–358.
18.
MartinsPGB.Foundational Universities and New Public Management.
Lisbo, Portugal:
Departamento de Ciência Política e Políticas Públicas, ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa; 2012.
19.
BahiaL.The Brazilian health system between norms and facts: mitigated universalization and subsidized stratification. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2009;
14:753–762.
20.
FilipponJGiovanellaLKonderMPollockAM. “Liberalizing” the English National Health Service: background and risks to healthcare entitlement.Cadernos de Saude Publica. 2016;
32:15.
21.
MAREC.Social Organizations. In: EstadoM, ed.
Brasilian:
Ministério da Administração Federal e Reforma do Estado; 1998.
22.
PaimJTravassosCAlmeidaCBahiaLMacinkoJ.The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges.Lancet. 2011;
377(9779):1778–1797.
23.
TurinoFSodreFBahiaL. Dual certification in health: the political articulation between philanthropic institutions and Social Health Organizations. In: Sodre F, Bussinguer ECdA, Bahia L, eds. Social Organizations: Political Agenda and Costs for the Public Health Sector. Vol 1. São Paulo, Brazil: Hucitec; 2018:364.
24.
IBGE. [INTERNET] Gross National Product – GNP. In: Statistics BIoGa, ed. Brasilia: IBGE.
https://www.ibge.gov.br/explica/pib.php. Published 2019. Accessed April 25, 2020.
25.
IBGE. Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations in Brazil 2010.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
IBGE; 2012.
26.
Sánchez-MartínezFIAbellán-PerpiñánJMOliva-MorenoJ.Privatization in Healthcare Management: An Adverse Effect of the Economic Crisis and a Symptom of Bad Governance. Barcelona, Spain: Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria; 2014:02139111.
27.
RexachÁM.Indirect management of public health care. Reflections on the debate on the privatization of healthcare. Revista de Administración Sanitaria Siglo XXI. 2008;
6(2):269–296.
28.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG, Prisma Group.
Reprint – preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009;
89(9):873–880.
29.
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services. Behandling av Astma Och KOL. En Systematisk Kunskapssammanställning. Stockholm, Sweden: SBU; 2000.
30.
EkmanB.Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence.Health Policy Plann. 2004;
19(5):249–270.
TurinoFSodreF.Health social organizations financed by congressional amendments.Trab Educ Saúde. 2018;
16(3):1201–1219.
33.
BertoliniDBMotaAVLMeloniDRCostaFNCostaALMatosPVdL.Management contract: The impact of contracting at the Women’s Health Reference Center in Ribeirão Preto – MATER. Medicina (Ribeiräo Preto). 2015;
48(1):19–26.
34.
FernandesLEMSoaresGBTurinoFBussinguerECdASodreF.Human resources in state hospitals managed by health social organizations: the logic of the private.Trab Educ Saúde. 2018;
16(3):955–973.
35.
MoraisHMMdAlbuquerqueMdSVdOliveiraRSdCazuzuAKISilvaNAFd.Social healthcare organizations: a phenomenological expression of healthcare privatization in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;
34(1):e00194916.
36.
JuniorWCF.Management of state hospitals in São Paulo through social health organizations. Rev adm pública. 2003;
37(2):243–264.
37.
MeloCTanakaO.Social organizations in the health sector: innovating management methods?Org Soc. 2001;
8(22):1–12.
38.
FalconerAP.The Third Sector Promise. São Paulo, Brazil: Center for Management Studies in the Third Sector,
University of Sao Paulo; 1999.
39.
de AlmeidaHP.Ideological and Societal Transformations of Public and Private Space in the Brazilian State. São Luis, Brazil: VI Jornada Internacional de Políticas Públicas; 2013.
40.
BaggenstossSDonadoneJC.The public health intermediated by social organizations: Arrangements and adjustments in the last two decades in Brazil. Latinoamérica. 2014;
59:69–98.
41.
DruckG.The outsourcing in public health: various forms of precarization of labor. Trab Educ Saúde. 2016;
14(Suppl 1): 15–43.
42.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia eEstatística. Profile of Brazilian States and Municipalities.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
IBGE; 2015.
43.
SilvaVMdLimaSMLTeixeiraM.Social organizations and state foundations of private law at the unified health system: relation between the public and the private and social control mechanisms.Saúde Debate. 2015;
39(spe):145–159.
44.
GohnMdG. Empowerment and community participation in social policies. Saúde e Sociedade. 2004;
13(2):20–31.
45.
SantosTBSSouzaJSdMartinsJSRosadoLBPintoICdM.Indirect management in hospital care: analysis of contractualisation by outsourcing of SUS hospitalsSaúde em Debate. 2018;
42(spe2):247–261.
46.
PilottoBSJunqueiraV.Health sector social organizations in São Paulo State: external control advancements and limits.Serv Soc Soc. 2017;130:547–563.
47.
DuarteIGBotazzoC.Workforce management in social health organizations: some observations. Rev Adm Saúde. 2009;
11(45):161–168.
48.
RomanoCMCScatenaJHGKehrigRT.Public-private link in the ambulatory care of high and medium complexity within the SUS: the role of the State Health Department of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Physis (Rio J). 2015;
25(4):1095–1115.
49.
SoaresGBBorgesFTdos SantosRRGarbinCASMoimazSASGomesC.Social organizations for health: privatization of health care services management or managerial solution to the SUS?Revista Eletrônica Gestão e Saúde. 2016(2):828–850.
50.
BarbosaNBEliasPEM.Health social organizations as a way of public/private management. Cien Saude Colet. 2010;
15(5):2483–2495.
51.
AndreazziMdFSdBravoMIS.Privatization of management and social organizations in health care.Trab Educ Saúde. 2014;
12(3):499–518.
52.
MayorM. Longman dictionary of contemporary English. In: Mayor M, ed. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 5th ed. London, England: Pearson Longman; 2009:2081.
53.
CastanheiraDFaulhaberCGerschmanS.The role played by mass media in constructing the governmental agenda on SUS in Rio de Janeiro.RECIIS (Online). 2018;
12(3):1–18.
54.
TravaginLB.The onrush of capital in health: a critical look at the social health organizations.Saúde Debate. 2017;
41(115):995–1006.
55.
PintoICM.Construction of the governmental agenda: actors, arenas and decision-making in health. Organ Soc. 2008;
15(44):13–23.
56.
McGregorS.Neoliberalism and health care. Int J Consum Stud. 2001;
25(2):82–89.
57.
MacinkoJAlmeidaCOliveiraEdSKlingelhoeferde Sá P.
Organization and delivery of primary health care services in Petrópolis, Brazil. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2004;
19(4):303–317.
58.
Elmelund-PræstekærCKlitgaardMB.Policy or institution? The political choice of retrenchment strategy. J Eur Public Policy. 2012;
19(7):1089–1107.
59.
Ocké-ReisCO.Challenges for the health reform in the current historical conjuncture.Saúde em Debate. 2017;
41:365–371.
60.
MendesÁ.Brazilian public health in the context of a state crisis or a crisis of capitalism?Saúde e Sociedade. 2015;
24:66–81.
61.
RochaO.Public management models. Revista de Administração e Políticas Públicas. 2000;
1(1):6–16.
62.
MatosTTFerreiraACLourençoAEscovalA.Internal versus external contracting in health care. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública. 2010;
9:161–180.
63.
CarneiroJunior NEliasPE.Brazilian state reform: social healthcare organizations. Rev Adm Pública. 2003;
37(2):201–226.
64.
SchmidAWendtC. The changing role of the state in healthcare service provision. In: The State and Healthcare. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010:53–71.
65.
WilkinsonRPickettK.The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone.
London, England:
Penguin UK; 2010.
66.
PikettyT.About capital in the twenty-first century. Am Econ Rev. 2015;
105(5):48–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
