JarginS. Debate on the Chernobyl disaster: response to Alison Rosamund Katz. Int J Health Serv2016; 47(1): 150–159.
2.
KatzAR. Who is afraid of volume 1181 of the New York academy of sciences? Under threat, the nuclear establishment plays dirty. Int J Health Serv2015; 45(3): 530–544.
3.
YablokovAVNesterenkoVBNesterenkoAV. Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment2009; Vol. 1181Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
4.
Thébaud-MonyA. La science asservie: Santé publique: les collusions mortifères entre industriels et chercheurs, Paris, France: Editions la Découverte, 2014.
World Health Organization. Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care programme. Geneva, Switzerland: Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum: Expert Group “health”; 2006.
9.
HendryJSimonSLWojcikA. Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what it can teach us about radiation risks?J Radiol Prot2009; 29: A29–A42. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S03.
10.
YablokovAV. A review and critical analysis of the “effective dose of radiation” concept. J Health Pollut2013; 3(5): 13–28. doi:10.5696/2156-9614-3.5.13.
11.
Schmitz-FeuerhakeIBusbyCPflugbeilS. Genetic radiation risks – a neglected topic in the low dose debate. Environ Health Toxicol2016; 31: e2016001. doi:10.5620/eht.e2016001.
12.
WerteleckiWKoerbleinAIevtushokB. Elevated congenital anomaly rates and incorporated Cesium-137 in the Polissia region of Ukraine. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol2016; 106: 194–200. doi:10.1002/bdra.23476.
13.
TsudaTTokinobuAYamamotoESuzukiE. Thyroid cancer detection by ultrasound among residents aged 18 years and younger in Fukushima Japan: 2011–2014. Epidemiology2015; 27: 316–322. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000385.
14.
CardisEVrijheidMBlettnerM. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res2007; 167: 396–416.
15.
LeuraudKRichardsonDBCardisE. Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers. Lancet2015; 2(7): e276–e281.
16.
SacksBMeyersonGSiegelJA. Epidemiology without biology: false paradigms, unfounded assumptions, and specious statistics in radiation science (with commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). Biol Theory2016; 11: 69–101. doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4.
17.
WilliamsonP. Demystifying the official discourse on childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima. Asia Pac J Jpn Focus2014; 12(49): 2.