Previous analyses indicate that there are a number of potentially serious health risks associated with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The objective of this work is to provide further insight into the potential health impacts of the TPP by investigating labour market pathways. The impact of the TPP on employment and working conditions is a major point of contention in broader public debates. In public health literature, these factors are considered fundamental determinants of health, yet they are rarely addressed in analyses of trade and investment agreements. We therefore undertake a prospective policy analysis of the TPP through a content analysis of the agreement’s Labour Chapter. Provisions of the Chapter are analyzed with reference to the health policy triangle and four main areas through which labour markets influence health: power relations, social policies, employment conditions and working conditions. Findings indicate that implementation of the TPP can have important impacts on health through labour market pathways. While the Labour Chapter is being presented by proponents of the agreement as a vehicle for improvement in labour standards, we find little evidence to support this view. Instead, we find several ways the TPP may weaken employment relations to the detriment of health.
GleesonDFrielS. Emerging threats to public health from regional trade agreements. Lancet2013; 381(9876): 1507–1509. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60312-8.
2.
FooksGGilmoreAB. International trade law, plain packaging and tobacco industry political activity: the trans-pacific partnership. Tob Control2013; 23(1): e1, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050869.
3.
FrielSGleesonDThowA-M. A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement. Glob Health2013; 9(1): 46, doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-46.
LopertRGleesonD. The high price of “free” trade: U.S. Trade agreements and access to medicines. J Law Med Ethics2013; 41(1): 199–223. doi:10.1111/jlme.12014.
6.
Pattemore PK. Tobacco or healthy children: The two cannot co-exist. Front Pediatr. 2013;1:20. doi:10.3389/fped.2013.00020.
7.
ThowAMSnowdonWLabontéR. Will the next generation of preferential trade and investment agreements undermine prevention of noncommunicable diseases? A prospective policy analysis of the trans pacific partnership agreement. Health Policy2015; 119(1): 88–96. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.002.
8.
HironoKGleesonDFreemanB. To what extent does a tobacco carve-out protect public health in the trans-pacific partnership agreement?Public Health Res Pract2016; 26(2): e2621622, doi:10.17061/phrp2621622.
9.
LabontéRSchramARuckertA. The trans-pacific partnership: is it everything we feared for health?Int J Health Policy Manag2016; 5(8): 487–496.
10.
BambraC. Work, Worklessness, and the Political Economy of Health, 1st ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2011.
11.
LinkBGPhelanJ. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav1995Spec No, 80–94.
12.
WaltGGilsonL. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan1994; 9(4): 353–370.
13.
BuseKMaysNWaltG. Making Health Policy, Berkshire, England: Open University Press, 2012.
14.
BuseK. Addressing the theoretical, practical and ethical challenges inherent in prospective health policy analysis. Health Policy Plan2008; 23(5): 351–360. doi:10.1093/heapol/czn026.
15.
LoewensonR. Globalization and occupational health: a perspective from southern Africa. Bull World Health Organ2001; 79(9): 863–868.
16.
GrownC. Trade liberalization and reproductive health: a framework for understanding the linkages. Development2005; 48(4): 28–42. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100198.
17.
LabontéRSchreckerT. Globalization and social determinants of health: introduction and methodological background (part 1 of 3). Glob Health2007; 3(5): 1–10. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-5.
18.
CorrigallJPlagersonSLundCMyersJ. Global trade and mental health. Glob Soc Policy2008; 8(3): 335–358. doi:10.1177/1468018108095632.
19.
LoewensonRNolenLBWamalaS. Review article: globalisation and women’s health in Sub-Saharan Africa: would paying attention to women’s occupational roles improve nutritional outcomes?Scand J Public Health2010; 38(4 Suppl): 6–17. doi:10.1177/1403494809358276.
20.
Benach J, Mutaner C, Santana V. Employment Conditions and Health Inequalities, Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health Employment Conditions Knowledge Network. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/themes/employmentconditions/en/. Published 2007. Accessed December 1, 2016.
21.
McNamaraC. Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical case study. Glob Health2015; 11(1): 42, doi:10.1186/s12992-015-0126-8.
Petri PA, Plummer MG. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Peterson Institute for International Economics. http://piie.com/publications/wp/wp16-2.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed February 12, 2016.
Capaldo J, Izurieta A, Sundaram JK. Trading Down: Unemployment, Inequality and Other Risks of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. The Global Development and Environment Institute: Tufts University. http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/policy_research/TPP_simulations.html. Published 2016. Accessed April 22, 2016.
Public Citizen. Korea, Colombia and Panama FTA Outcomes: U.S. Exports to Korea Are Down, Imports from Korea Are Up, Colombia’s AntiUnionist Violence and Panama’s Tax Haven Policies Continue. http://www.citizen.org/documents/fta-trifecta-factsheet.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed December 1, 2016.
35.
CabinMA. Labor rights in the Peru agreement: can vague principles yield concrete change?Columbia Law Rev2009; 109(5): 1047–1093.
PolaskiS. Protecting labor rights through trade agreements: an analytical guide. J Int Law Policy2003; 10(13): 13–25.
38.
ILAB. ILAB News Release: Officials of both nations meet on US-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement [01/29/2010]. Bureau of International Labor Affairs. http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/ilab/ILAB20100148.htm. Published 2010. Accessed January 18, 2016.
United States Government Accountability Office. Free Trade Agreements: U.S. Partners Are Addressing Labor Commitments, but More Monitoring and Enforcement Are Needed. United States Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-160. Published 2014. Accessed July 19, 2016.
BrammerSJacksonGMattenD. Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socioecon Rev2012; 10(1): 3–28. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030.
44.
Kinderman D. “Free us up so we can be responsible!” The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socioecon Rev. 2012;10(1):29–57. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr028.
ElmsD. Getting from Here to There: Stitching Together Goods Agreements in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement, Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2012.
CiuriakDDadkhahAXiaoJ. Taking the Measure of the TPP as Negotiated, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Networkhttp://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2743009. Published 2016. Accessed April 22, 2016.
Benach J, Vives A, Tarafa G, Delclos C, Muntaner C. What should we know about precarious employment and health in 2025? Framing the agenda for the next decade of research. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(1):232–238. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv342.
StandingG. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Trade Paperback ed edition. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
59.
KabeerN. Globalization, labor standards, and women’s rights: dilemmas of collective (in)action in an interdependent world. Fem Econ2004; 10(1): 3–35. doi:10.1080/1354570042000198227.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
