The teaching of digital control design: a project approach
This paper deals with the development of a project as an alternative to teach digital control to undergraduate students. The project has an important basic research in a context of interest towards possible applications. Two other projects which were also developed are briefly described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ÅströmK. J. and WittenmarkB., Computer Controlled Systems, Prentice Hall (1984).
2.
GoodwinG.C. and SinK.S., Adaptive filtering, prediction and control, Prentice Hall (1984).
3.
JacquotR.G., Modern Digital Control Systems, Marcel Dekker (1981).
4.
BrubakerT., ‘Energy distributions for sampled and reconstructed periodic signals’, Int. J. Control, 17, No. 4, pp. 817–822 (1973).
5.
KwakernaakH., ‘Uncertainty models and the design of robust control systems’, in Uncertainty and Control (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences), Thoma Ed., Springer-Verlag (1985).
6.
ThompsonP.M., SteinG. and AthansM., ‘Conic sectors for sampled-data feedback systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 3, pp. 77–82 (1983).
7.
De la Sen,M. and Gil-AguirrebeitiaC., ‘A stable adaptive control design for discrete plants with unmodelled dynamics’, Comput. Math. Applic., 13, No. 4, pp. 341–350 (1987).
8.
De la SenM., ‘A robust indirect discrete adaptive control approach based on passivity results for nonlinear systems’, Comput. Math. Applic., 15, No. 5, pp. 389–403 (1988).
9.
MelsaJ.L. and SchultzD.G., Linear Control Systems, McGraw-Hill (1969).
10.
RalstonA. and WilfH.S., Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers, Vol. I, J. Wiley (1960).
11.
FunF. and ChonH.S., ‘Open loop gain compensation for closed-loop pole-assignment self tuners’, IEE Proceedings-D, 1346 (1987).
12.
LeeS.H. and LeeT.T., ‘Synthesis of discrete-time compensators with specified gain and phase margins’, Int. J. Control, 471, pp. 217–227 (1988).
13.
VicinoA., ‘Robustness of pole location in perturbed systems’, Automatica, 251, pp. 109–113(1989).
14.
SohY.C. and EvansR.J., ‘Characterization of robust controllers’, Automatica, 251, pp. 115–117(1989).
15.
HalpernM.E., ‘Modified pole-assignment controller for plant models with exact or near pole-zero cancellation’, IEE-Proceedings-D, 135, Part D, 3, pp. 189–195 (1988).
16.
De la SenM., ‘Suboptimization techniques for improving transients in adaptive control’, Int. J. Control, 44, No. 3, pp. 737–765 (1986).
17.
De la SenM., ‘The design of a discrete robust linear feedback controller with nonlinear saturating actuator’, Int. J. Systems Sci., 20, No. 4, pp. 321 (1989).
18.
De la SenM., ‘A robust discrete adaptive control algorithm involving linear and/or saturating inputs’, 4th Congress Latinoamericano de Control Automatico, Puebla, Mexico, 1, pp. 1–8 (Nov.1990).
19.
DemirgioğluH. and GawthorpP.J., ‘Continuous-time relay self-tuning control’, Int. J. Control, 474, pp. 1061–1080 (1988).
20.
OhkawaF. and Yonezawa, ‘A discrete model reference adaptive control system for a plant with input amplitude constraints’, Int. J. Control, 365, pp. 747–753 (1982).
21.
PayneA.N., ‘Adaptive one-step-ahead control subject to an input-amplitude constraint’, Int. J. Control, 434, pp. 1257–1269 (1986).
22.
ZhangC. and EvansR., ‘Amplitude constrained adaptive control’, 461, pp. 53–64 (1987).
