Assessment plays a major role in student learning. It needs to be provided on a regular basis and include the aspect of reflective practice to be really effective. The purpose of this article is to highlight the results of how an academic in Electrical Engineering effectively used Blackboard™ to foster student engagement and academic success through regular online self-assessments that require reflective practice. A time-lag study is used with a non-experimental descriptive design. A total of 812 first-year engineering students were asked to complete weekly online self-assessments via Blackboard™ between 2016 and 2018. Results indicate that students engaged at least three times more with each section of the course content and that their pass rate increased by more than 20% when compared to previous years where no online self-assessments were used. These results tend to suggest that online self-assessments should include multiple attempts with some form of feedback to foster student engagement and academic success.
SternbergRJ.Why schools should teach for wisdom: the balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educ Psychol2001;
36: 227–245.
2.
ThorburnM.When an old cricketer leaves the crease’: bittersweet reflections on examination awards in physical education. Sport Educ Soc2019;
24: 404–414.
3.
HendersonSKlineKA.Critical social dialogues and reflecting in action. In: Kline KA (eds) Reflection in action: a guidebook for student affairs professionals and teaching faculty.
Virginia: Stylus Publishing
, 2013, pp. 51–64.
4.
SwartAJ.Student usage of a learning management system at an open distance learning institute – a case study in electrical engineering. Int J Electric Eng Educ2015;
52: 142–154.
5.
White B and Larusson J (2010) Seeing, thinking, doing: strategic directives for learning management systems. In: Sanchez J and Zhang K (eds) Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 1279--1288. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/35731/ (accessed 20 February 2021).
6.
CosgraveMBairreI.Web tool use in group work among history students at UCC.
Cork:
National University of Ireland, 2010.
7.
DanielsP.Course management systems and implications for practice. Int J Emerg Technol Soc2009;
7: 97.
8.
ÁlvarezAMartínMFernández-CastroI, et al.
Blending traditional teaching methods with learning environments: experience, cyclical evaluation process and impact with MAgAdI. Comput Educ2013;
68: 129–140.
9.
OuadoudMChkouriMYNejjariA.Learning management system and the underlying learning theories: towards a new modeling of an LMS. Int J Inform Sci Technol2018;
2: 25–33.
10.
TurnbullDChughRLuckJ.Learning management systems: an overview. In: TatnallA (ed) Encyclopedia of education and information technologies.
Cham:
Springer, 2019, pp.1–7.
11.
ChughRLedgerSShieldsR.Curriculum design for distance education in the tertiary sector. Turkish Online J Dist Educ2017;
18: 4–15.
12.
SwartAJHertzogPE.Analysing student accesses in a learning management system yields notable insights relating to student success. World Trans Eng Technol Educ2020;
18: 111–116.
13.
ArkorfulVAbaidooN.The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Int J Instruct Technol Dist Learn2015;
12: 29–42.
14.
ZhangDZhaoJLZhouL, et al.
Can e-learning replace classroom learning?Commun ACM2004;
47: 75–79.
15.
BoltonGDelderfieldR.Reflective practice: writing and professional development. 5th ed.
London:
Sage publications, 2018.
16.
Fosso-KankeuE. Reflective practice in teaching: assessing suitable strategies for reflective practice in large classes. In: 17th international conference on science, engineering, technology & waste management (SETWM-19), Johannesburg, South Africa, 18-19 November
2019.
17.
SchönDA.The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action.
London:
Harpur Collins, 1983.
18.
DeweyJ.How we think.
Boston:
DC Health, 1933.
19.
FungCYAbdullahMNLYHashimS.Improving self-regulated learning through personalized weekly e-Learning journals: a time series quasi-experimental study. e J Business Educ Scholar Teach2019;
13: 30–45.
20.
LazarusD.Promoting self-responsibility: learning from Australian maritime engineering student and alumni in developing employability competencies. IOP Conf Ser2018;
175: 012224.
21.
WallTPerrinD.We know, but still. In: GibbsP (ed) Slavoj žižek.
Cham:
Springer, 2015, pp. 37–48.
22.
SwartAJ.An epic consequence of classroom revision of course content for first-year African engineering students. World Trans Eng Technol Educ2018;
16: 368–373.
23.
GoddardWMelvilleS.Research methodology: an introduction. 2nd ed.
Lansdowne:
Juta & Co, 2006.
24.
ElakkiyaESivarajPVijayaprabhakarA.Growth and performance of cashew nut production in India-an analysis. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci2017;
6: 1817–1823.
25.
IbrahimMAbdallahamedS.Service recovery and customer satisfaction: a case of Uganda telecom. Eur J Business Manage2014;
6: 197–209.
26.
SwartAJ.Evaluation of final examination papers in engineering: a case study using bloom's taxonomy. IEEE Trans Educ2010;
53: 257–264.
27.
SwartAJ.Engaging African engineering students with problem-based learning by using the disassembly–assembly technique. Int J Electric Eng Educ2018;
55: 244–257.
28.
HowardP.Articulating the learning: professional practice made explicit. Asia Pacific J Cooperat Educ2009;
10: 177–188.
29.
SwartAJ. Using Web2.0 technology to improve student academic success among senior engineering students – a case study from a telecommunications module! In: SATNAC, 6--9 September 2015.
