MaYYanMHuangG.The formation of group collective organizational deviance. J Manag Sci2016;
29: 59–70.
2.
HuangGHYanMN. Why groups engage in collective deviance? The role of unethical leadership. In: Academy of management meeting, Briarcliff Manor, NewYork, 2014, p.13365. AeQ1
3.
McgloinJMThomasKJ.Incentives for collective deviance: group size and changes in perceived risk, cost, and reward. Criminology2016;
54: 459–486.
4.
AliasMRasdiRMSaidA-MA.The impact of negative affectivity, job satisfaction and interpersonal justice on workplace deviance in the private organizations. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanities2012;
20: 829–846.
5.
AbdulRARAizatMN.Trust inorganizational and WD behavior, the moderating effect of locus of control. Int J Bus2008;
10: 211–235.
6.
AliA.Organizational deviance and multi-factor leadership. Educ Res Rev2016;
11: 589–597.
7.
van GilsSvan QuaquebekeNvan KnippenbergD, et al.
Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: the moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. Leadership Q2015;
26: 190–203.
8.
GreenleafRK.Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness.
New York, NY:
Paulist Press, 1977.
9.
Van DierendonckD.Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. J Manag2011;
37: 1228–1261.
10.
SendjayaSSarrosJ.Servant leadership: its origin, development, and application in organizations. J Leadersh Organiz Stud2002;
9: 57–64.
11.
EvaNRobinMSendjayaS, et al.
Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. Leadersh Q2019;
30: 111–132.
12.
WalumbwaFOHartnellCAOkeA.Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. J Appl Psychol2010;
95: 517–529.
13.
HoggMA.Social identity theory. In: BrukePJ (ed.) Contemporary social psychological theories.
Palo Alto, CA:
Stanford University Press, 2006, pp.111–136.
14.
HoggMAvan KnippenbergDRastDEIII.The social identity theory of leadership: theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. Eur Rev Soc Psychol2012;
23: 258–304.
15.
TajfelHTurnerJC.The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinW (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations.
Chicago:
Nelson Hall, 1986: 7–24.
16.
ZhangYZuoB.Social identity theory and it’s development. Adv Psycholog Sci2006;
14: 475–480.
17.
HoggMATerryDJ.Social identity and self-categorization process in organizational contexts. Acad Manag Rev2000;
25: 121–140.
18.
TunerJCHoggMAOakesOJ, et al. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory.
Oxford, UK:
Basil Blackwell, 1987.
19.
Van DierendonckDNuijtenI.The servant leadership survey: development and validation of a multidimensional measure. J Bus Psychol2011;
26: 249–267.
20.
XieY-zWuP.The influence of transformational leadership and social exchange on employee subjective well-being in work scene. Soft Sci2017;
31: 61–65.
21.
SchaubroeckJLamSSPengAC.Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behaviour influences on team performance. J Appl Psychol2011;
96: 863–871.
22.
LapalmeMEStamperCLSimardG, et al.
Bringing the outside in: can “external” works experience insider status. J Organiz Behav2009;
30: 919–940.
23.
XieJWangLPingCX.An empirical research on the mechanisms of leader-member exchange and employee creativity in China. J Ind Eng/Eng Manag2014;
28: 1–7.
24.
LaubJA.Assessing the servant organization. Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (OLA) model. Dissertation Abstracts Int1999;
60: 308A (UMI No. 9921922).
25.
StetsJ.Identity theory. In: BurkePJ (ed.) Contemporary social psychological theories.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford Social Sciences, 2006: 111–136.
26.
ChengMYWangL.The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: a team-level analysis in the Chinese context. J Bus Ethics2015;
129: 639–654.
27.
WangZZhangSYeX.The multilevel influence of servant leadership on employee innovative behavior: the role of intraorganizational employee navigation and team reflexivity. Hum Resour Dev China2020;
37: 20–32.
28.
Van KnippenbergBvan KnippenbergD.Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. J Appl Psychol2005;
90: 25–37.
29.
HuayunL.Rational man, egoism and moral incentives – a study on Mancur Olson’s collective action theory. J China West Normal Univ2014;
28: 1–7.
30.
RobinsonSBennettR.Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J Appl Psychol2000;
85: 349–360.
31.
LidenRCWayneSJZhaoH, et al.
Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadersh Q2008;
19: 161–177.
32.
LidenRCWayneSJLiaoC, et al.
Servant leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and unit performance. Acad Manage J2014;
57: 1434–1452.
PodsakoffPMMac KenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al.
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003;
88: 879–903.
35.
ChenMChenCCSheldonOJ.Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol2016;
101: 1082–1096.
36.
ReynoldsWM.Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Clin Psychol1982;
38: 119–125.
37.
PreacherKJZhangZZyphurMJ.Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multi level data: the advantage of multilevel SEM. Struct Equ Modeling2011;
18: 161–182.
38.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ.A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods2010;
15: 209–233.
39.
ZhaoXLynchJGChenQ.Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res2010;
37: 197–206.
40.
BironM.Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational values and organizational deviance. Hum Relat2010;
63: 875–897.
41.
FangHHeBZhangY, et al.
The effect of servant leadership on new generation employee. Hum Resour Dev China2018;
35: 6–15.
42.
WangZSongMPengJ, et al. “
Leader” or “system”? Understanding the relationship between servant leadership, service-oriented human resource management and employee service innovation. Manage Rev2018;
30: 46–67.
43.
HunterEMNeubertMJPerrySJ, et al.
Servant leaders inspire servant followers: antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. Leadersh Q2013;
24: 316–331.
44.
WangZLiu ZhijunMXinF, et al.
Team cooperative goals and shared leadership: the mediating effects of constructive controversy and team identification. Hum Resour Dev China2020;
37: 6–19.
45.
LiangYYanMChuX.The double-edge sword effects of leader group prototypicality in the multi-team context. Acta Psychol Sinca2018;
50: 58–68.
46.
AsadiFAbutN.Kharitonov’s theorem: a good starting point for robust control. Int J Electr Eng Educ2021;
58: 57–82.