JinGDengXZZhangQ, et al.
Comprehensive function zoning of national land space for Wuhan metropolitan region. Geograph Res2017;
36: 541–552.
2.
FangCLZhouCHGuCL, et al.
Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Acta Geograph Sin2016;
71: 531–550.
3.
CieślakI.Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods. Land Use Policy2019;
89: 104225.
4.
PavónDVenturaMRibasA, et al.
Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the alt empordà county(Catalonia, Spain). J Arid Environ2003;
54: 543–552.
5.
DunkAVDGrêt-RegameyADalangT, et al.
Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts—a case study from Switzerland. Landscape Urban Plann2011;
101: 149–156.
6.
ZhouDXuJCWangL.Land use spatial conflicts and complexity: a case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China. Geograph Res2015;
34: 1630–1642.
7.
ChenWLiuHQZhuHM, et al.
Temporal and spatial evolutionary characteristics and simulation prediction of land use conflict during rapid urbanization—taking Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan city group as an example. Jiangsu Agricult Sci2017;
45: 286–291.
8.
PengJJZhouGHTangCL, et al.
The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region based on ecological security: a case study of Changsha Zhuzhou Xiangtan urban agglomeration. J Nat Res2012;
27: 1507–1519.
9.
GrootRD.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Urban Plann2005;
75: 175–186.
10.
KalabamuFT.Land tenure reforms and persistence of land conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa—the case of Botswana. Land Use Policy2019;
81: 337–345.
11.
SteinhäußerRSiebertRSteinführerA, et al.
National and regional land-use conflicts in Germany from the perspective of stakeholders. Land Use Policy2015;
49: 183–194.
12.
WehrmannB.Land conflicts: a practical guide to dealing with land disputes.
Eschborn:
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH, 2008.
13.
AndrewJS.Potential application of mediation to land use conflicts in small-scale mining. J Clean Prod2003;
11: 117–130.
14.
XiaoHBYuanQSongFF.Study on the evolution and mechanism of the formation of land use conflicts of scenic sites in city: case study of Xiqiaoshan scenic site. China Landscape Architect2013;
29: 117–120.
15.
RuanSTWuKN.Research on land use conflict and its mitigation mechanism in the process of urbanization-based on the perspective of non-cooperative game. China Popul Res Environ2013;
23: 388–392.
16.
YuL.Types of rural land conflicts and their management in the process of urbanization. Reform Open2014;
6: 13–14.
17.
Delgado-MatasCMola-YudegoBGrittenD, et al.
Land use evolution and management under recurrent conflict conditions: Umbundu agroforestry system in the Angolan highlands. Land Use Policy2015;
42: 460–470.
18.
HendersonSR.Managing land- use conflict around urban centres: Australian poultry farmer attitudes towards relocation. Appl Geogr2005;
25: 97–119.
19.
CampbellDJGichohiHMwangiA, et al.
Land use conflict in Kajiado district, Kenya. Land Use Policy2000;
17: 337–348.
20.
IojăCINiţăMRVânăuGO, et al.
Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest metropolitan area. Ecol Indicat2014;
42: 112–121.
21.
Milczarek-AndrzejewskaDZawalińskaKCzarneckiA.Land use conflicts and the common agricultural policy: evidence from Poland. Land Use Policy2018;
73: 423–433.
22.
ZhouDXuJCLinZL.Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. Sci Total Environ2017;
577: 136–147.
23.
ZhouGHPengJJ.The evolution characteristics and influence effect of spatial conflict: a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Progr Geogr2012;
31: 717–723.
24.
LiuQQZhaoHFWuKN, et al.
Identifying potential land use conflict based on competitiveness of different land use types in Beijing, China.Res Sci2014;
36: 1579–1515.
25.
YangYFZhuL.The theory and diagnostic methods of land use conflicts. Res Sci2012;
34: 1134–1141.
26.
YuATWWuYZZhengBB, et al.
Identifying risk factors of urban-rural conflict in urbanization: a case of China. Habit Int2014;
44: 177–185.
27.
BrownGRaymondCM.Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape Urban Plann2014;
122: 196–208.
28.
Reyes-GarcíaVOrta-MartínezMGuezeM, et al.
Does participatory mapping increase conflicts? A randomized evaluation in the Bolivian amazon. Appl Geogr2012;
34: 650–658.
29.
KuusaanaEDBukariKN.Land conflicts between smallholders and Fulani pastoralists in Ghana: evidence from the Asante Akim North District (AAND). J Rural Stud2015;
42: 52–62.
30.
PachecoFALSanches- FernandesLF.Environmental land use conflicts in catchments: a major cause of amplified nitrate in river water.Sci Total Environ2016;
548–549: 173–188.
31.
BuserM.The production of space in metropolitan regions: a Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Plann Theory2012;
11: 279–298.
32.
ZouLLLiuYSWangJY, et al.
Land use conflict identification and sustainable development scenario simulation on China’s southeast Coast. J Clean Prod2019;
238: 117899–117816.
33.
ZhaoXNGongXTianFH, et al.
The urban land ecological suitability evaluation of Yanji-Longjing-Tumen region. J Nat Res2017;
32: 778–787.
34.
RanNJinXBFanYT, et al.
Three lines’ delineation based on land use conflict identification and coordination in Jintan district, Changzhou. Res Sci2018;
40: 284–298.
35.
WuDZhouZXGaoJX, et al.
Ecological status changes of water conservation key ecological function areas in China. Environ Sci Technol2017;
40: 174–179.
36.
XieGDZhangCXZhangLM, et al.
Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. J Nat Res2015;
30: 1243–1254.
37.
YeJXieQQTanNY.National land spatial pattern distribution method based on ecological carrying capacity. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Eng2017;
33: 262–271.
38.
WangQ.Study on multi-dimensional comprehensive management and control division of intensive use of construction land in Hebei province. China Popul Res Environ2017;
27: 136–139.
39.
YuanWCXuMDYangC, et al.
Research on land use zoning based on suitability evaluation—a case study of Fenyang, Shanxi Province.Agricult Res Arid Areas2018;
36: 210–217.
40.
MosaadAMAttiaMAAbdelazizAY.Comparative performance analysis of AVR controllers using modern optimization techniques. Electr Power Components Syst2018;
46: 2117–2130.
41.
NelsonEMendozaGRegetzJ, et al.
Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ2009;
7: 4–11.
