Electric power systems allocate a certain amount of production capacity to provide uninterrupted power, which should be optimal and reliable. Thus, the power system can continue to operate regularly and sustainably without the need for a sudden interruption of some production units or an unforeseen load increase. For this, the optimum amount of reserves should be kept ready, which is one of the serious resources used by the power system to prevent fundamentally unpredictable failures. In this study, while the unit is being allocated, three parameters will be considered in determining the optimum reserve amount, which are the units with production costs, line losses, and reliability. In the system used as 22 Bus, each of these three impressive factors was analysed for the appropriate spinning reserve cost by adding an account and compared with eight different case studies. As a result of the calculations, the most reasonable cost of the result, in which line losses have a very low effect, evaluated in terms of production cost and reliability. As a result, when the reserve is allocated to the units in power systems, the right policy for the most appropriate planning is proposed to ensure sustainable and uninterrupted electricity.
ChiradejaPRamakumarR.An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion2004;
19: 764–773.
2.
LiuZYuHLiuR, et al.
Configuration optimization model for data-center park-integrated energy systems under economic, reliability, and environmental considerations. Energies2020;
13: 448.
3.
KyuHJMun-KyeomK.Stochastic unit commitment based on multi-scenario tree method considering uncertainty. Energies2018;
11: 740.
4.
RoyBBipulK.Well-being analysis of wind integrated power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst2011;
26: 1–11.
5.
YunWJWooNLHyunHK, et al.
Thermal unit commitment using binary differential evolution. J Electr Eng Technol2009;
4: 323–329.
6.
ChattopadhyayDBaldickR.Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve. Proc IEEE Power Eng Soc Winter Meeting2002;
1: 280–285.
7.
ShayestehEYousefiAMoghaddamMP.A probabilistic risk-based approach for spinning reserve provision using day-ahead demand response program. Energy2010;
35: 1908–1915.
8.
AhmadiKACherkaouiR.A probabilistic spinning reserve market model considering DisCo. Electr Power Syst Res2011;
81: 862–872.
9.
KennethBErikD.Endogenous probabilistic reserve sizing and allocation in unit commitment models: cost-effective, reliable, and fast. IEEE Trans Power Syst2017;
32: 1.
10.
LannoyeEFlynnDO'MalleyM.Transmission, variable generation, and power system flexibility. IEEE Trans Power Syst2015;
30: 57–66.
11.
ArmandoMLJoséFCRoyB. Probabilistic assessment of spinning reserve via cross-Entropy method considering renewable sources and transmission restrictions. IEEE Trans Power Syst2017; 2: 1617–1628.
12.
ZhaoBGuoCXBaiBR, et al.
An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment. Electr Power Energy Syst2006;
28: 482–490.
13.
LonglongLDongmeiZ.Optimal spinning reserve for power system with wind integrated. Energy Power Eng2013;
5: 1011–1015.
14.
WuHGooiHB. Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve with ramp constraints. In: Proc IEEE Power Eng Soc Winter Meeting1999;
2: 785–790.
15.
DeveikisTMiliuneRNevardauskasEV.Reliability of divided small electric energy system.Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika2013;
19: 1392–1215.
16.
SobhyMA. Allocating transmission losses to loads and generators through complex power tracing. IET Generation Transm Distribution2007;
1: 584–595.
17.
AwadASalamaMMATarekHME.Optimal ESS allocation and load shedding for improving distribution system reliability. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2014; 42: 1–11.
18.
DiaaeldinIAbdel AleemSEl-RafeiA, et al.
Optimal network reconfiguration in active distribution networks with soft open points and distributed generation. Energies2019;
12: 4172.
19.
Rizk-AllahRMAbdel MageedHMEl-SehiemyRA, et al.
A new sine cosine optimization algorithm for solving combined non-convex economic and emission power dispatch problems. Irecon2017;
5: 180–192.
20.
MostafaMHAbdel AleemSHEAliSG, et al.
Techno-economic assessment of energy storage systems using annualized life cycle cost of storage (LCCOS) and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) metrics. J Energy Storage2020;
29: 101345.
21.
TurMR.Reliability assessment of distribution power system when considering energy storage configuration technique. IEEE Access2020;
8: 77962–77971.
22.
SavierJSDasD.Impact of network reconfiguration on loss allocation of radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2007;
22: 2473–2480.
23.
ChenCSLinCHChuangHJ, et al.
Optimal placement of line switches for distribution automation systems using immune algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst2006;
21: 1209–1217.
24.
DasD.A fuzzy multi objective approach for network reconfiguration of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2006;
21: 202–209.
25.
JeonYJKimJOShinJR, et al.
An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for network reconfiguration in large-scale distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Del2002;
17: 1070–1078.
26.
PrasadKRanjanRSahooNC, et al.
Optimal reconfiguration of radial distribution systems using a fuzzy mutated genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2005;
20pt. 1.: 1211–1213.
27.
SalazarHGallegoRRomeroR.Artificial neural networks and clustering techniques applied in the reconfiguration of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2006;
21: 1735–1742.
28.
BoHYingZHejunY, et al.
Reliability evaluation of power system operations considering time-varying features of components. J Electr Eng Technol2015;
10: 1422–1431.
29.
RaghavendraCSAnujanV.Reliability and fault-tolerance in multistage interconnection networks. Sddhang1987;
11: 111–128.
30.
AmanullaBChakrabartiSSinghSN.Reconfiguration of power distribution systems considering reliability and power loss. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2012;
27: 918–926.
31.
HossainETurMRPadmanabanS, et al.
Analysis and mitigation of power quality issues in distributed generation systems using custom power devices. IEEE Access2018;
6: 16816–16833.
32.
TurMRAySErdumanA, et al.
Impact of demand side management on spinning reserve requirements designation. Int J Renewable Energy Res2017;
7
33.
TurMR, et al.
Calculation of optimal value of spinning reserve requirement for unit commitment in power systems by considering lost parameters. J Faculty Eng Architect Gazi Univ2019;
34: 1171–1185.
34.
ZhaolongWJianyingDWuD, et al.
Reserve constrained dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effect: a two-stage mixed integer linear programming approach. CSEE JPES2017;
3: 203–211.
35.
GopalakrishnanRKrishnanA.An efficient technique to solve combined economic and emission dispatch problem using modified ant colony optimization. Sadhana2013;
38: 545–556.
36.
TurMR.Reliability assessment of distribution power system when considering energy storage configuration technique. IEEE Access2020;
2020:2990345.
37.
ShahidehpourMYaminHLiZY.Market operations in electric power systems.
New York:
Wiley, 2002.
38.
PadhyNP.Unit commitment – a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans Power Syst2004;
19: 1196–1205.
39.
JiaJYangNXingC, et al.
An improved constrained order optimization algorithm for uncertain SCUC problem solving. Energies2019;
12: 4498.
40.
GallardoACSantanderLGPezoaJE.Greedy reconfiguration algorithm for medium-voltage distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2009;
24: 328–337.
41.
MoradiAFiruzabadMF.Optimal switch placement in distribution systems using trinary particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2008;
23: 271–279.
42.
FalaghiHHaghifamMRSinghC.Ant colony optimization based method for placement of sectionalizing switches in distribution networks using a fuzzy multi objective approach. IEEE Trans Power Delivery2009;
24: 268–276.
43.
Reliability Test System Task Force.The IEEE reliability test system. IEEE Trans Power Syst1996;
14: 1010–1020.
44.
MadrigaMQuintanaVH.An analytical solution to the economic dispatch problem. IEEE Power Eng Rev2000;
20: 52–55.
