FrankSTHsiaoM-CW.Catching up and convergence: long-run growth in East Asia. Rev Dev Econ2004;
8: 223–236.
2.
AcemogluDAghionPZilibottiF.Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. J Eur Econ Assoc2006;
4: 37–74.
3.
LaiMWangHZhuS.Double-edged effects of the technology gap and technology spillovers. China Econ Rev2009;
20: 414–424.
4.
OuYYiXShengY.Technology gap, resource allocation and transformation of growth pattern of large lagging country. China Ind Econ2012;
6: 18–30.
5.
ChoiMChungKLeeS, et al.
The evaluation of technology level on Korea’s mid- and long-term strategic technologies. J Korean Technol Innov Soc. 2005;
8: 650–676.
6.
Korea Evaluation Institute of Technology and Center for Research and Development Strategy. Comparison between the results of international technology level evaluation conducted by KEIT and CRDS, www.jst.go.jp/crds/pdf/2012/XR/CRDS-FY2012-XR-02.pdf (2012, accessed 10 October 2019).
7.
Japan Science and Technology Agency and Center for Research and Development Strategy. International comparison of science and technology capability, judged by Japanese experts, www.jst.go.jp/crds/pdf/en/CRDS-FY2011-RR-03_EN.pdf (2011, accessed 10 October 2019).
8.
ChoiMJiSMinHS. Technology level assessment by publication analysis: application in agriculture research. In: PICMET proceedings, Portland OR, 5–9 August 2007, pp. 1704–1720. New York: IEEE.
MannixENealeMA.What differences make a difference?Psychol Sci Public Interest2005;
6: 31–55.
13.
WiersemaMFBantelKA.Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad Manage J1992;
35: 91–121.
14.
YuanL.Does expert background impact the national technology level assessment? Evidence from the survey of national technology competition. Sci Technol Prog Policy2016;
19: 101–105.