This work analyzes the impact of admission grade point average (AGPA) on academic results of electrical engineering university students throughout their undergraduate studies. The analysis was carried out on two bachelor engineering degree programs offered at the School of Telecommunication Engineering at the Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Spain: Telecommunication Systems Engineering and Telematics Engineering. Data from seven consecutive academic years were used to compute three indicators regarding the same cohort of students: exam attendance rate, success rate, and performance rate. The results show that although there exists a significant correlation between AGPA and student performance, it is truly relevant only in the first two academic courses (in this work, a course is assumed to be the compilation of all subjects in a year). In view of the results, a set of guidelines is proposed in order to soften the impact of AGPA on the progress of university students.
AliSHaiderZMunirF, et al.
Factors contributing to the students academic performance: a case study of Islamia University sub-campus. Education2013;
1: 283–289.
2.
KillenR.Differences between students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of factors influencing students’ academic success at university. Higher Educ Res Dev1994;
13: 199–211.
3.
MillsCHeyworthJRosenwaxL, et al.
Factors associated with the academic success of first year health science students. Adv Health Sci Educ2009;
14: 205–217.
4.
PetersonCBarrettLC.Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshman. J Pers Soc Psychol1987;
53: 603–607.
5.
RichardsonMAbrahamCBondR.Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull2012;
138: 353–387.
6.
Chamorro-PremuzicTFurnhamA.Personality predicts academic performance: evidence from two longitudinal university samples. J Res Personal2003;
37: 319–338.
7.
Chamorro-PremuzicTFurnhamA.Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personal Indiv Differ2008;
44: 1596–1603.
8.
GiffordDDBriceno-PerriottJMianzoF.Locus of control: Academic achievement and retention in a sample of university first-year students. J College Admiss2006;
191: 18–25.
9.
McKenzieKSchweitzerR.Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Educ Res Dev2001;
20: 21–33.
10.
OladokunVOAdebanjoATCharles-OwabaOE.Predicting students’ academic performance using artificial neural network: a case study of an engineering course. Pacific J Sci Technol2008;
9: 72–79.
11.
ByrneMFloodB.Examining the relationships among background variables and academic performance of first year accounting students at an Irish university. J Account Educ2008;
26: 202–212.
12.
HoffmanJLLowitzkiKE.Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students. Rev Higher Educ2005;
28: 455–474.
13.
KuncelNRCredéMThomasLL.A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) for graduate student academic performance. AMLE2007;
6: 51–68.
14.
WinRMillerPW.The effects of individual and school factors on university students’ academic performance. Aust Econ Rev2005;
38: 1–18.
15.
ANECA. National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, www.aneca.es/eng (2019, accessed 5 September 2019).
AfzalHAliIAslam KhanM, et al.
A study of university students’ motivation and its relationship with their academic performance. IJBM2010;
5: 80–88.
18.
ChenCStevensonHW.Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Dev1995;
66: 1215–1234.
19.
TavaniCMLoshSC.Motivation, self-confidence, and expectations as predictors of the academic performances among our high school students. Child Study J2003;
33: 141–151.
20.
TellaA.The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Ed2007;
3: 149–156.
21.
ZimmermanBJBanduraAMartinez-PonsM.Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am Educ Res J1992;
29: 663–676.
22.
FroilandJMWorrellFC.Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychol Schs2016;
53: 321–336.
23.
SpringerLStanneMEDonovanSS.Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res1999;
69: 21–51.
24.
FenollarPRománSCuestasPJ.University students’ academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Br J Educ Psychol2007;
77: 873–891. doi:10.1348/000709907X189118.
25.
ReyesMRBrackettMARiversSE, et al.
Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. J Educ Psychol2012;
104: 700.
26.
ZimmermanBJ.Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ Psychol1990;
25: 3–17.
27.
SchiefeleU.Interest, learning, and motivation. Educ Psychol1991;
26: 299–323.
28.
TruemanMHartleyJ.A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students. High Educ1996;
32: 199–215. doi:10.1007/BF00138396
29.
ParkerJDSummerfeldtLJHoganMJ, et al.
Emotional intelligence and academic success: Examining the transition from high school to university. Personal Individ Diff2004;
36: 163–172.
30.
CokleyK.An investigation of academic self-concept and its relationship to academic achievement in African American college students. J Black Psychol2000;
26: 148–164.
31.
ReynoldsWM.Measurement of academic self-concept in college students. J Pers Assess1988;
52: 223–240.
