CutrightTJEvansEBrantnerJS.Building an undergraduate STEM team using team-based learning leading to the production of a storyboard appropriate for elementary students. J Sci Educ Technol2014;
23: 344–354.
2.
MurrayC. Engineering in the twenty-first century. Harvard Magazine, September – October, 2011, pp. 375–376.
3.
ChangM.Engineers in the 21st century. IEEE J Select Topics Quantum Electron2000;
6: 976–977.
4.
BlumenfeldPCSolowayEMarxRWet al.
Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educ Psychol1991;
26: 369–398.
5.
BarronBJSchwartzDLVyeNJet al.
Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. J Learn Sci1998;
17: 271–311.
6.
PassowHJPassowCH.What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review. J Eng Educ2017;
106: 475–526.
7.
PrinceM.Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ2004;
93: 223–231.
8.
KernABensonL. Engineering students’ perceptions of the future: exploratory instrument development. In: 122nd ASEE annual conference & exposition, Seattle, 14--17 June 2015.
9.
HanneyRSavin-BadenM.The problem of projects: understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. Lond Rev Educ2013;
111: 7–19.
10.
FreemanSEddySLMcDonoughMet al.
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2014;
111: 8410–8415.
11.
HuetI.based education as a model to change the teaching and learning environment in STEM disciplines. Eur J Eng Educ2017;
16: 1–6.
12.
JohnstoneAHPercivalF.Attention breaks in lectures. Educ Chem1976;
13: 49–50.
13.
MillsJETreagustDF.Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Aust J Eng Educ2003;
3: 2–16.
14.
HanneyR.Doing, being, becoming: a historical appraisal of the modalities of project-based learning. Teach High Educ2018; 23
: 769–783.
15.
BebisGEgbertDShahM.Review of computer vision education. IEEE Transac Educ2003;
46: 2–21.
16.
CabreTPCairolMTCalafellDFet al.
Project-based learning example: controlling an educational robotic arm with computer vision. IEEE Rev Iberoam Tecnol Aprend2013;
8: 135–142.
17.
ReimerPAlbuATzanetakisG.Raydiance: a tangible interface for teaching computer vision. Adv Visual Comput2011;
2: 259–269.
18.
Hoover.
Computer vision in undergraduate education: modern embedded computing. IEEE Trans Educ2003;
46: 235–240.
19.
ElisaTStefanoMEnricoP.Training master students to program both virtual and real autonomous robots in a teaching laboratory. Global Eng Educ Conf2016;
3: 621–630.
20.
TanjaHInaSReinhardG.Robotics in education. Computers and Education2018;
630: 141.
21.
GeronimoDSerratJLopezAMet al.
Traffic sign recognition for computer vision project-based learning. IEEE Trans Educ2013;
56: 364–371.
TangJLiuSPeiSet al.Teaching autonomous driving using a modular and integrated approach
. In: IEEE 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) 2018, pp. 361–366.
24.
CarrióMAgellLBañosJEet al.
Benefits of using a hybrid problem-based learning curriculum to improve long-term learning acquisition in undergraduate biology education. FEMS Microbiol Lett2016; 15: 363–378.
25.
KardashCM.Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. J Educ Psych2000;
92: 191.
26.
OakleyBFelderRMBrentRet al.
Turning student groups into effective teams. J Stud Center Learn2004;
2: 9–34.
