This article describes experiences of teaching object-oriented programming to undergraduate Electrical Engineering students. The proposed project-based methodology increased the interest of students in programming. The project focuses on the development of a small C++ class that allows students to build geometric models by manipulating a three-dimensional matrix. The class methods (C++ member functions) can draw complex scenes by using combinations of them. Students can improve their programming skills according to the points of view of a class developer and a class user. In addition, students try to create beautiful models to present to each other, making the learning experience pleasant and motivating.
Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula AfCMA and Society IC. Computer science curricula 2013: curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science.
New York, NY, USA:
ACM, 2013.
2.
RogersRLombardoJMednieksZ, et al. Android application development: programming with the google SDK. 1st ed.
USA:
OSA: mmi Media, Inc., 2009.
3.
ConwayJHillegassA.IOS programming: the big nerd ranch guide.
Boston:
Addison-Wesley, 2012.
4.
HeiningerRPriftiLSeifertV, et al. Teaching how to program with a playful approach: a review of success factors. In: 2017 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), 2017, pp.189–198.
5.
SaveryJR.Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip J Problem-Based Learn2006;
1: 9–21.
6.
FerreiraGNascimentoMAssisK, et al. Teaching object oriented programming computer languages: learning based on projects. In: International conference on software engineering advances, 2007 (ICSEA 2007), 2007, pp.81–81.
7.
GouldingT.A first semester freshman project: The Enigma encryption system in C. ACM Inroads2013;
4: 43–46.
8.
ChenYLChiangCYHuangYP, et al. A project-based curriculum for teaching C++ object-oriented programming. In: 2012 9th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence computing and autonomic trusted computing (UIC/ATC), 2012, pp.667–672.
9.
Kae ChenWChengYC.Teaching object-oriented programming laboratory with computer game programming. IEEE Trans Educ2007;
50: 197–203.
10.
OvermarsM.Teaching computer science through game design. Computer2004;
37: 81–83.
11.
JordineTLiangYIhlerE. A mobile-device based serious gaming approach for teaching and learning Java programming. In: Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2014, pp.1–5. USA: IEEE.
12.
SungKSnyderL.A case of computer science principles with traditional text-based programming languages. J Comput Sci Coll2014;
30: 161–172.
13.
YanL. Teaching object-oriented programming with games. In: Proceedings of the 2009 sixth international conference on information technology: new generations (ITNG’TN), 2009, pp. 969–974. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
14.
KöllingM.Greenfoot: introduction to Java with games and simulations. J Comput Sci Coll2010;
25: 117.
KaufmanAShimonyE. 3D scan-conversion algorithms for voxel-based graphics. In: Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on interactive 3D graphics (I3D’3D), 1986, pp.45.979 New York, NY, USA: ACM.
CignoniPCallieriMCorsiniM, et al. Meshlab, www.meshlab.net/ (2015, accessed 11 June 2019).
21.
CignoniPCallieriMCorsiniM, et al. MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Eurographics Italian chapter conference (eds V Scarano, RD Chiara and U Erra). Italy: The Eurographics Association, 2008, pp. 129–136.
22.
JosuttisNM.The C++ standard library: a tutorial and reference.
Boston, MA, USA:
Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1999.
23.
HayesAFKrippendorffK.Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas2007;
8: 77–89.
24.
FreelonD.ReCal OIR: ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. Int J Internet Sci2013;
1: 10–16.
25.
LandisJRKochGG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977;
33: 159–174.
26.
O6.2307PBigdanV.The biggest loser competition. IEEE Trans Educ2008;
51: 123–130.
27.
ArbelaitzOMartínJIMuguerzaJ.Analysis of introducing active learning methodologies in a basic computer architecture course. IEEE Trans Educ2015;
58: 110–116. DOI:10.1109/TE.2014.2332448.
28.
JohnsonMHayesMJ.A comparison of problem-based and didactic learning pedagogies on an electronics engineering course. Int J Electr Eng Educ2015;
53: 3–22.
29.
HosseinzadehNHesamzadehMR.Application of project-based learning (PBL) to the teaching of electrical power systems engineering. IEEE Trans Educ2012;
55: 495–501.
30.
BonwellCCEisonJA.Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom.
Washington, DC, USA:
George Washington University Press, 1991.
