Examinations and remediation actions for the mathematics problem in electrical engineering at The University of the West Indies

Abstract

The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of the West Indies' (UWI’) St Augustine Trinidad and Tobago Campus conducted a review and revision of its BSc mathematics programming in 2009. The review was framed to take account of strategic as well as operational imperatives of an accredited degree in the context of a number of resource and other constraints typical of small island developing states. Intake, content and delivery were examined and the findings were used to guide the revision exercise. Associated interventions were assessed five years later. This paper provides an account of the considerations and process for the review and revision exercises. It discusses student performance and other indicators before and after the interventions; and examines the new curriculum against fit for purpose criteria alongside programming in best in class institutions and UK-based accreditation reference points. The paper closes with recommendations for ongoing review and revision cycles applicable to the Department at the UWI and other similarly situated institutions.

Keywords

Engineering mathematics math curriculum mathematics competency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davis

Harrison

Palipana

. Assessment-driven learning of mathematics for engineering students. Int J Electric Eng Educ 2005; 42: 63–72.

Kitchen

. The changing profile of entrants to mathematics at a level and to mathematical subjects in higher education. Br Educ Res J 1999; 25: 57.

Larcombe

. Engineering mathematics: the crisis continues. Eng Sci Educ J 1998; 7: 273–281.

Silius K, Pohjolainen S and Kangas J. What can be done to bridge the competency gap between upper-secondary school and university mathematics? In: 2011 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) – “Learning environments and ecosystems in engineering education”, Amman, Jordan, 4–6 April 2011.

Steen

. Mathematics education: a predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science 1987; 237: 251–302.

UWI. Faculty of Engineering Regulations & Syllabus, University of The West Indies, Faculty of Engineering, 2004.

UWI. Faculty of Engineering Regulations & Syllabus, University of The West Indies, Faculty of Engineering, 2007.

SEFI. Mustoe L and Lawson D (eds) Mathematics for the European engineer: A curriculum for the twenty-first century, SEFI Mathematics Working Group, 2002.

Kennedy

Hyland

Ryan

. Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide, Cork: University College Cork, 2007.

10.

Krathwohl

. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theor Pract 2002; 41: 212–218.

11.

IET. D.A. Committee (ed.) IET handbook of learning outcomes for BEng and MEng degree programmes. UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2013.

12.

Strum

Kirk

. Engineering mathematics: who should teach it and how. IEEE Trans Educ 1979; E-22: 85–88.

13.

Otung IE. A minimal-mathematics approach in engineering education. In: IEE international symposium engineering education: innovations in teaching, learning and assessment, London: IEE, 4–5 January 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 4/1–4/6.

14.

Beattie

Collins

McInnes

. Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Account Educ 1997; 6: 1–12.

15.

Hay

. Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Stud Higher Educ 2007; 32: 39–57.

16.

Perkin

Bamforth

. A variety of approaches to the provision of mathematics help for first-year engineering undergraduates. Int J Electr Eng Educ 2010; 48: 79–91.

17.

Otung

. Reassessing the mathematical content of engineering education. Eng Sci Educ J 2011; 10(4): 130–138.