This paper covers the possibility of retraining for those electrical engineering undergraduate students already having some basic digital knowledge. It gives a solution to lead the students to the microcontroller-based program control of complex industrial tasks with a uniform approach. It presumes that the students are familiar with combinational and sequential logic, know the hardware and software basics of microcontroller systems, and have experience in the use of C program language. Building upon these, it presents a lookup table-based control description system for simple combinational solutions to complicated sequential controls. It separately details this kind of implementation of sequential controls according to the Sequential Function Chart (SFC) program language corresponding with the standard IEC 61131-3. For the processing of the tabular data describing the controls, it provides interpreter programs independent from the current tasks. Teaching outcomes are discussed in the final part of the paper.
RengelRMartinMJVasalloBG. Supervised coursework as a way of improving motivation in the learning of digital electronics. IEEE Trans Elec2012; 55(4): 525–528.
2.
AbramovBBLevinI. Split flowcharts in teaching digital system design. Int J Elec Eng Educ2013; 50(4): 408–419.
3.
BormidaGDPontaDDonzelliniG. Methodologies and tools for learning digital electronics. IEEE Trans Educ1997; 40(4): 294.
4.
StanisavljevicZPavlovicVNikolicB. SDLDS-system for digital logic design and simulation. IEEE Trans Educ2013; 56(2): 235–245.
5.
Weng T, Zhu YY and Cheng C-K. Digital design and programmable logic boards: do students actually learn more?. In: Proc. 38th annual frontiers in education conf. (FIE 2008), Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, 2008, pp.S1H-1.
6.
Gáti J, Hegyesi F and Kártyás Gy. Courses for engineers considering the age of virtual engineering. In: Proc. int. symp. on applied machine intelligence and informatics (SAMI-2014), Herl'any, Slovakia, 2014, pp.157–161.
7.
MazidiMAMazidiJGMcKinlayRD. The 8051 microcontroller and embedded systems, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.
8.
Sen Gupta G and Chew M-T. New frontiers of microcontroller education: introducing SiLabs ToolStick University Daughter Card. In: Proc. IEEE int. conf. on sensor networks, ubiquitous and trustworthy computing (SUTC '08.), Taichung, Taiwan, 2008, pp.439–444.
9.
GreenPRGreenPNBaileyM. Design and delivery of a microcontroller engineering teaching theme. Int J Electr Eng Educ2013; 50(3): 231–238.
10.
ManoMMCilettiMD. Digital design: with an introduction to the Verilog HDL, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2012.
11.
KernighanBWRitchieD. The C programming language, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.
12.
IEC 61131-3, Programmable controllers - Part 3: Programming languages, International Standard. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013.
13.
LewisRW. Programming industrial control systems using IEC 1131-3, Revised Edition, London: The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1998, 1998.
PontMJ. Patterns for time-triggered embedded systems: building reliable applications with the 8051 family of microcontrollers, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2001.
18.
ApsleyJ. An autonomous line-following robot project as a training tool for project work. Int J Electr Eng Educ2013; 50(3): 239–246.
Novak-MarcincinJJanakMBarnaJ. Verification of a program for the control of a robotic workcell with the use of AR. Int J Adv Robot Syst2012; 9. Art. No. 54.
24.
Durovsky F and Fedak V. Integrated mechatronic systems laboratory. In: Proc. 14th Int. power electronics and motion control conf. (EPE-PEMC 2010), Ohrid, Macedonia. 2010, pp.S51–S55.
25.
Gyeviki J, Sárosi J and Csikós S. Position control of pneumatic actuators with PLC. In: Proc IEEE/ASME int conf on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM-2011), Budapest, Hungary, 2011, pp.742–747.
HorváthLRudasIJ. Active knowledge for the situation-driven control of product definition. Acta Polytech Hungarica2013; 10(2): 217–234.
28.
Fuerstner I, Gogolak L and Pletl S. Solution diversity for a specified project in mechatronics. In: Proc. int. conf. science in practice, Pécs, Hungary, 2012.
29.
Dragoş C-A, Preitl S, Precup R-E, et al. Modern control solutions for mechatronic servosystems, comparative case studies. In: Proc. int. symp. of Hungarian researchers on computational intelligence and informatics, Budapest, Hungary, 2009, pp. 69–82.
