Mass immigration is transforming the politics of income redistribution in European welfare states. Some scholars argue that immigration erodes public support for redistribution, while others argue it could have the opposite effect. Until now, the literature has attempted to isolate a generic role of immigration without distinguishing between different immigration categories. This article analyzes the relationship between internal European migration and public support for income redistribution in 17 Western European countries using the European Social Survey’s seven rounds (2002–2014). It finds that some forms of internal migration, namely, migration from new Central and Eastern European countries, are positively related to Western European support for income redistribution. The study also sheds light on the crucial role of the welfare state, finding that the compensation effect is stronger in countries with higher social protection. The results support group-specific understandings of the relationship between immigration and income redistribution. In sum, the relationship varies by immigrant group and depends on the generosity of social protection.
AlesinaAGlaeserESacerdoteB (2001) Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity32(2): 187–278.
2.
AlesinaAMurardERapoportH (2021) Immigration and preferences for redistribution in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography21(6): 925–954.
3.
AmentaEBonastiaCCarenN (2001) US social policy in comparative and historical perspective: Concepts, images, arguments and research strategies. Annual Review of Sociology27: 213–234.
4.
BailCA (2008) The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review73(1): 37–59.
5.
BarthEFinseraasHMoeneKO (2015) Political reinforcement: How rising inequality curbs manifested welfare generosity. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 565–577.
6.
BorängF (2015) Large-scale solidarity? Effects of welfare state institutions on the admission of forced migrants. European Journal of Political Research54(2): 216–231.
7.
BradyDBosticA (2015) Paradoxes of social policy welfare transfers, relative poverty, and redistribution preferences. American Sociological Review80(2): 268–298.
8.
BradyDFinniganR (2014) Does immigration undermine public support for social policy?American Sociological Review79(1): 17–42.
9.
BraunMRecchiE (2009) Free-moving West Europeans an empirically based portrait. In: FassmannHHallerDMLaneDS (eds) Migration and Mobility in Europe: Trends, Patterns and Control. Bingley: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 85–101.
10.
BrooksCManzaJ (2006) Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review71(3): 474–494.
11.
BrooksCManzaJ (2007) Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BryanMLJenkinsSP (2016) Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review32: 3–22.
13.
BurgoonB (2014) Immigration, integration, and support for redistribution in Europe. World Politics66(3): 365–405.
14.
BurgoonBKosterFvan EgmondM (2012) Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy22(3): 288–304.
15.
CappelenCMidtbøT (2016) Intra-EU labour migration and support for the Norwegian welfare state. European Sociological Review32: 691–703.
16.
CappelenCPetersY (2018) Diversity and welfare state legitimacy in Europe. The challenge of intra-EU migration. Journal of European Public Policy25(9): 1336–1356.
17.
CrepazMMLDamronR (2008) Constructing tolerance: How the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comparative Political Studies42(3): 437–463.
18.
DahlbergMEdmarkK (2008) Is there a “race-to-the-bottom” in the setting of welfare benefit levels? Evidence from a policy intervention. Journal of Public Economics92(5–6): 1193–1209.
19.
DrinkwaterSEadeJGarapichM (2009) Poles apart? EU enlargement and the labour market outcomes of immigrants in the United Kingdom. International Migration47(1): 161–190.
20.
EgerMA (2010) Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review26(2): 203–217.
21.
EgerMABreznauN (2017) Immigration and the welfare state: A cross-regional analysis of European welfare attitudes. International Journal of Comparative Sociology58: 440–463.
22.
EllisonN (2000) Proactive and defensive engagement: Social citizenship in a changing public sphere. Sociological Research Online5: 11–21.
23.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FavellA (2008) The new face of East–West migration in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34: 701–716.
25.
FavellA (2011) Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
FinseraasH (2008) Immigration and preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics6(4): 407–431.
27.
FreemanGP (2009) Immigration, diversity, and welfare chauvinism. The Forum7(3): 0000102202154088841317.
28.
GalgócziBWattA (2009) EU Labour Migration Since Eunlargement: Trends, Impacts and Policies. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
29.
GorodzeiskyASemyonovM (2009) Terms of exclusion: Public views towards admission and allocation of rights to immigrants in European countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(3): 401–423.
30.
GrangerC (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica37: 424–438.
31.
GreenEFaselNSarrasinO (2010) The more the merrier? The effects of type of cultural diversity on exclusionary immigration attitudes in Switzerland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence4(2): 177–190.
32.
HagendoornL (1995) Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology6(1): 199–228.
33.
HallMEK (2017) Macro implementation: Testing the causal paths from U.S. macro policy to federal incarceration. American Journal of Political Science61(2): 438–455.
34.
HerdaD (2010) How many immigrants? Foreign-born population innumeracy in Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly74(4): 674–695.
35.
HerdaD (2015) Beyond innumeracy: Heuristic decision-making and qualitative misperceptions about immigrants in finland. Ethnic and Racial Studies38(9): 1627–1645.
36.
HjorthF (2016) Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics17: 3–24.
37.
HollandDFicTRincon-AznarA, et al. (2011) Labor Mobility within the EU: The Impact of Enlargement and the Functioning of Transitional Arrangements. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
38.
HollifieldJF (2004) The emerging migration state. International Migration Review38(3): 885–912.
39.
JaegerMM (2006) What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: Self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach. Acta Sociologica49(3): 321–338.
40.
JeannetA-M (2020a) A threat from within? Perceptions of immigration in an enlarging European Union. Acta Sociologica63(4): 343–360.
41.
JeannetA-M (2020b) Internal migration and public opinion about the European Union: A cross-sectional time series study. Socio-Economic Review18(3): 817–838.
42.
KahanecMZaicevaAZimmermanK (2009) Lessons from migration after EU enlargement. In: KahanecMZimmermannKF (eds) EU Labor Markets after Post-Enlargement Migration. Cham: Springer, pp. 3–45.
43.
KingR (2001) The Mediterranean Passage: Migration and New Cultural Encounters in Southern Europe. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
44.
KingR (2002) Towards a new map of European migration. International Journal of Population Geography8(2): 89–106.
45.
KingRPattersonG (1998) Diverse paths: The elderly British in Tuscany. International Journal of Population Geography4(2): 157–182.
46.
KirchnerAFreitagMRappC (2011) Crafting tolerance: The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. European Political Science Review3(2): 201–227.
47.
KriegerHMaîtreB (2006) Migration trends in an enlarging European Union. Turkish Studies7(1): 45–66.
48.
KulinJEgerMAHjermM (2016) Immigration or welfare? The progressive’s dilemma revisited. Socius2: 1–15.
49.
KunovichRM (2004) Social structural position and prejudice: An exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Social Science Research33(1): 20–44.
50.
KvistJ (2004) Does EU enlargement start a race to the bottom? Strategic interaction among EU member states in social policy. Journal of European Social Policy14(3): 301–318.
51.
KymlickaW (2015) Solidarity in diverse societies: Beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies3(1): 17.
52.
LarsenCA (2006) The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Farnham: Ashgate.
53.
MauS (2012) Unravelling working-class welfare chauvinism. In: SvallforsS (ed.) Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 119–157.
54.
MauSBurkhardtC (2009) Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy19(3): 213–229.
55.
MettlerSSossJ (2004) The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics2(1): 55–73.
56.
MuñozJPardos-PradoS (2019) Immigration and support for social policy: An experimental comparison of universal and means-tested programs. Political Science Research and Methods7(4): 717–735.
57.
Murphy-LejeuneE (2003) Student Mobility and Narrative in Europe: The New Strangers. New York: Routledge.
58.
NagayoshiKHjermM (2015) Anti-immigration attitudes in different welfare states: Do types of labor market policies matter?International Journal of Comparative Sociology56(2): 141–162.
59.
NaumannEStoetzerLF (2018) Immigration and support for redistribution: Survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics41(1): 80–101.
60.
OECD (2017) International Migration Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
61.
RappC (2017) Shaping tolerant attitudes towards immigrants: The role of welfare state expenditures. Journal of European Social Policy27(1): 40–56.
62.
RecchiE (2005) Migrants and Europeans: An outline of the free movement of persons in the EU. Academy of Migration Studies (AMID) Working Paper Series 38/2005.
63.
ReeskensTvan OorschotW (2012) Disentangling the “new liberal dilemma”: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(2): 120–139.
64.
SainsburyD (2006) Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: Welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes. Journal of European Social Policy16(3): 229–244.
65.
SantacreuOBaldoniEAlbertMC (2009) Deciding to move: Migration projects in an integrating Europe. In: RecchiEFavellA (eds) Pioneers of European Integration: Citizenship and Mobility in the EU. Bingley: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 52–71.
66.
Schmidt-CatranAW (2016) Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: Combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 119–140.
67.
Schmidt-CatranAWSpiesDC (2016) Immigration and welfare support in Germany. American Sociological Review81(2): 242–261.
68.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2006) The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review71(3): 426–449.
69.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2008) Foreigners’ impact on European societies public views and perceptions in a cross-national comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(1): 5–29.
70.
SenikCStichnothHVan der StraetenK (2009) Immigration and natives’ attitudes towards the welfare state: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research91(3): 345–370.
71.
SkupnikC (2014) EU enlargement and the race to the bottom of welfare states. IZA Journal of Migration3(1): 15.
72.
SteeleLG (2016) Ethnic diversity and support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces94(4): 1439–1481.
73.
StegmuellerDScheepersPRossteutscherSde JongE (2012) Support for redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the role of religion. European Sociological Review28(4): 482–497.
74.
StegmuellerD (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 748–761.
75.
SteinhardtMF (2009) “The dimensions and effects of EU labour migration in Germany.” In: GalgócziBLeschkeJWattA (eds) EU Labour Migration since Enlargement. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 101–125.
76.
SvallforsS (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review13(3): 283–304.
77.
Taylor-GoobyP (2005) Is the future American? Or, can left politics preserve European welfare states from erosion through growing diversity?Journal of Social Policy34(4): 661–672.
78.
te GrotenhuisMScholteMGraafD, et al. (2015) The between and within effects of social security on church attendance in Europe 1980–1998: The danger of testing hypotheses cross-nationally. European Sociological Review31(5): 643–654.
79.
Van der WaalJAchterbergPHoutmanD, et al. (2010) “Some are more equal than others”: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 350–363.
80.
Van OorschotW2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics28(1): 33–48.
81.
VerkuytenMKinketB (2000) Social distances in a multi ethnic society: The ethnic hierarchy among Dutch preadolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly63(1): 75–85.
82.
WallmanS (1988) Ethnicity and the boundary process in context. In: RexJMasonD (eds) Theories of Race and Ethnic Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–245.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
