Scientists often surmise that scientific thought is a universal faculty akin to Kant’s description of “pure reason.” The conventional view insists that science should censor the passions and bar the intrusion of emotional and subconscious motives into scientific work. This article challenges this truism by showing that the split between reason and emotions is rather culturally mediated. Using interviews with 125 Israeli scientists who had collaborated with German colleagues, the study allowed respondents to compare their scientific practices and intellectual styles with those of their German compatriots. The results suggest that in contrast to their sober and uber-rational German colleagues, Israeli scientists’ intellectual style can be described as fiery, enflamed, and passionate. Indeed, they often spoke of “love” and “desire” as central elements that drive innovation and creativity in scientific discovery. Their minds, they implied, function through emotional reason.
AbendG (2006) Styles of sociological thought: Sociologies, epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Quests for Truth*. Sociological Theory24(1): 1–41.
2.
AlexanderJ (2003) The Meaning of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlexanderJCSmithP (2002) The strong program in cultural theory: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In: TurnerJH (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic; Plenum Publishers, pp. 135–150.
4.
AlmogO (2000) The Sabra: The Creation of the New Jew. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
5.
BarbaletJ (2002) Science and emotions. The Sociological Review 50(2_suppl): 132–150.
6.
BarbaletJ (2011) Emotions beyond regulation: Backgrounded emotions in science and trust. Emotion Review3(1): 36–43.
7.
BatesonG (2000) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BecherTTrowlerPR (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
9.
BermanM (1988) All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin.
10.
BeyarRZeeviBRechaviG (2017) Israel: A start-up life science nation. The Lancet389(10088): 2563–2569.
11.
BinswangerHC (1994) Money and Magic: A Critique of the Modern Economy in Light of Goethe’s Faust. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1996) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BourdieuP (2002) The role of intellectuals today. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory99:1–6.
14.
BrownJK (1986) Goethe’s Faust: The German Tragedy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
DallmayrF (1988) Habermas and rationality. Political Theory16(4): 553–579.
16.
DamásioAR (1995) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
17.
DastonLGalisonP (1992) The image of objectivity. Representations40: 81–128.
18.
de OliveiraSNisbettRE (2017) Culture changes how we think about thinking: From “human inference” to “geography of thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science12(5): 782–790.
19.
DurkheimE (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan Education.
20.
FranksDD (2018) Neurosociology: Fundamentals and Current Findings. Dordrecht: Springer.
21.
GaltungJ (1981) Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches. Social Science Information20(6): 817–856.
22.
GammerlB (2012) Emotional styles—Concepts and challenges. Rethinking History16(2): 161–175.
23.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
24.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
HabermasJ (1970) Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
HenrichJ (2020) The Weirdest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous. New York: Picador.
27.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. London; New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
JasanoffSKimS-H (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva47(2): 119–146.
30.
Knorr CetinaK (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
KruglanskiAWWebsterDM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing.”Psychological Review103(2): 263–283.
32.
KuipersG (2013) The rise and decline of national habitus: Dutch cycling culture and the shaping of national similarity. European Journal of Social Theory16(1): 17–35.
33.
KumarK (2001) Sociology and the Englishness of English social theory. Sociological Theory19(1): 41–64.
34.
KumarK (2006a) English and British national identity. History Compass4(3): 428–447.
35.
KumarK (2006b) English and French national identity: Comparisons and contrasts. Nations and Nationalism12(3): 413–432.
36.
LamontM (2000) Comparing French and American sociology. Tocqueville Review21(1): 109–122.
37.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
LernerJSLiYValdesoloP, et al. (2015) Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology66: 799–823.
39.
MesquitaB (2022) Between Us: How Cultures Create Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.
40.
MouzelisN (2007) Habitus and reflexivity: Restructuring Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Sociological Research Online12(6): 9.
41.
NisbettRE (2003) The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently . . . and Why. New York: Free Press.
42.
OtnielD (1999) The affect of experiment: The turn to emotions in Anglo-American physiology, 1900-1940. Isis90(2): 205–237.
43.
PankseppJ (1998) Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
PfotenhauerSJasanoffS (2017) Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the “MIT model” in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science47(6): 783–810.
45.
ScheerM (2012) Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory51(2): 193–220.
46.
SchwartzN (1998) Warmer and more social: Recent developments in cognitive social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology24: 239–264.
47.
SenorDSingerS (2009) Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle. New York; Boston, MA: A Council on Foreign Relations Book.
48.
ShapinS (2008) The Scientific Life: A Moral History Of A Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
SismondoS (2010) An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, 2nd edn.New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
50.
StetsJETurnerJH (eds) (2006) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. New York: Springer.
51.
von GoetheJW (1998) Faust: A Tragedy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
WacquantL (2014) Homines in extremis: What fighting scholars teach us about habitus. Body & Society20(2): 3–17.
53.
WeberM (1973) Max Weber on Universities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
54.
YairG (2015) Love Is Not Praktish: The Israeli Look at Germany. Bnei B’rak, Israel: Ha’Kibbutz Hameuchad (in Hebrew).
55.
YairG (2019) Culture counts more than money: Israeli critiques of German science. Social Studies of Science49: 898–918.
56.
YairG (2020a) Hierarchy versus symmetry in German and Israeli science. American Journal of Cultural Sociology8: 214–245.
57.
YairG (2020b) The uncanny: How cultural trauma trumps reason in German Israeli scientific collaborations. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung45(1): 87–102.
58.
YairGGoldsteinKRotemN, et al. (2022) The three cultures in American science: Publication productivity in physics, history and economics. Scientometrics127: 2967–2980.
59.
YairGSoyerM (2008) The Golem and German Social Theory. Lanham, MD; Lexington: Rowman & Littlefield.
60.
Yeshua-KatzDEfrat-TreisterD (2021) Together in the tech trenches”: A view of Israel”s innovation culture. Innovation23(3): 337–353.
61.
ZhangLSternbergRJ (2005) A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review17(1): 1–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
