Perceptions of violated entitlement resulting from group-based relative deprivation shape attitudes and behaviors decisively. Drawing on social identity theory, I hypothesize that nationalism and constructive patriotism portray divergent relationships with subjective feelings of being disadvantaged due to different coping strategies to overcome status inferiority. Employing an original, large-scale survey from six European countries, the results clearly show that group-based relative deprivation is positively linked to nationalism, whereas the reverse holds for constructive patriotism. These results hold irrespective of a wide array of robustness checks. Thus, the present study adds to extant literature by identifying feelings of disadvantage as crucial for predicting nationalism and constructive patriotism, two key manifestations of group membership and in-group identification.
AbramsDGrantPR (2012) Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. The British Journal of Social Psychology51(4): 674–689.
2.
AbramsDTravaglinoGAGrantPR, et al (2020) Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well-being with the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective well-being model. The British Journal of Social Psychology59(2): 425–446.
3.
AdornoTFrenkel-BrunswikELevinsonD, et al (1950) The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
4.
AltemeyerB (1998) The other “authoritarian personality.” In: ZannaMP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Elsevier Textbooks, pp. 47–92.
5.
ArceneauxKNickersonDW (2009) Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis17(2): 177–190.
6.
ArielyG (2012) Globalization, immigration and national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations15(4): 539–557.
7.
BergLHjermM (2010) National identity and political trust. Perspectives on European Politics and Society11(4): 390–407.
8.
BernhardL (2017) Three faces of populism in current Switzerland: Comparing the populist communication of the Swiss people’s party, the Ticino League, and the Geneva Citizens’ Movement. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 509–525.
9.
BlankT (2003) Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: An empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem. Political Psychology24(2): 259–288.
10.
BlankTSchmidtP (2003) National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology24(2): 289–312.
11.
BonikowskiB (2017) Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology68(1): 181–213.
12.
BonikowskiBDiMaggioP (2016) Varieties of American popular nationalism. American Sociological Review81(5): 949–980.
13.
BonikowskiBHalikiopoulouDKaufmannE, et al (2019) Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: A scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism25(1): 58–81.
14.
BosLSchemerCCorbuN, et al (2020) The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-country experiment. European Journal of Political Research59(1): 3–24.
15.
BrockmannHDelheyJWelzelC, et al (2009) The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies10(4): 387–405.
16.
BrubakerR (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BrubakerR (2020) Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism26(1): 44–66.
18.
Castanho SilvaBJungkunzSHelblingM, et al (2020) An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly73(2): 409–424.
19.
CitrinJWongCDuffB (2001) The meaning of American national identity. In: AshmoreRDJussimLWilderD (eds) Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Resolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–100.
20.
CoendersMScheepersP (2004) Associations between nationalist attitudes and exclusionary reactions in 22 countries. In: GijsbertsMHagendoornLScheepersP (eds) Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 187–208.
21.
CookTDCrosbyFJHenniganKM (1977) The construct validity of relative deprivation. In: SulsJMMillerRL (eds) Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 307–333.
22.
CottamMDietz-UhlerBMastorsE, et al (2010) Introduction to Political Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
23.
CramerKJ (2016) The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
24.
DavidovE (2009) Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Political Analysis17(1): 64–82.
25.
de CleenBStavrakakisY (2020) How should we analyze the connections between populism and nationalism: A response to Rogers Brubaker. Nations and Nationalism26(1): 342–350.
26.
de FigueiredoRElkinsZ (2003) Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of in-group pride. American Journal of Political Science47(1): 171–188.
27.
DinesenPTSchaefferMSønderskovKM (2020) Ethnic diversity and social trust: A narrative and meta-analytical review. Annual Review of Political Science23(1): 441–465.
28.
DonnerAKlarN (2000) Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. New York: Arnold Publishers.
29.
ElchardusMSpruytB (2016) Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition51(1): 111–133.
30.
EllerAAbramsDWrightSC, et al (2020) Effects of intergroup contact and relative gratification vs. deprivation on prejudice on both sides of the U.S./Mexico status divide. Journal of Applied Social Psychology50(7): 406–417.
31.
ErhardtJWamslerSFreitagM (2021) National identity between democracy and autocracy: A comparative analysis of 24 countries. European Political Science Review13(1): 59–76.
32.
EsaisassonPSohlbergJGhersettiM, et al (2020) How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from “the Swedish experiment.”European Journal of Political Research60: 748–760.
33.
FeinsteinY (2016) Rallying around the president: When and why do Americans close ranks behind their presidents during international crisis and war?Social Science History40(2): 305–338.
34.
FilsingerMWamslerSErhardtJ, et al (2021) National identity and populism: The relationship between conceptions of nationhood and populist attitudes. Nations and Nationalism27(3): 656–672.
35.
FinellEZogmaisterC (2015) Blind and constructive patriotism, national symbols and outgroup attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology56(2): 189–197.
36.
GellnerE (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
37.
GestJRenyTMayerJ (2018) Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1694–1719.
38.
GidronNHallPA (2017) The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology51(1): 1–28.
39.
GidronNHallPA (2020) Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies53(7): 1027–1059.
40.
GrahamCPettinatoS (2002) Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well-being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies38(4): 100–140.
41.
GrantPRBennettMAbramsD (2017) Using the SIRDE model of social change to examine the vote of Scottish teenagers in the 2014 independence referendum. The British Journal of Social Psychology56(3): 455–474.
42.
GreenEGTSarrasinOFaselN, et al (2011) Nationalism and patriotism as predictors of immigration attitudes in Switzerland: A municipality-level analysis. Swiss Political Science Review17(4): 369–393.
43.
GriffinJDKiewiet de JongeCVelasco-GuachallaVX (2020) Deprivation in the midst of plenty: Citizen polarization and political protest. British Journal of Political Science51: 1080–1096.
44.
GuimondSDambrunM (2002) When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(7): 900–912.
45.
HabermasJ (1994) Struggles for recognition in the Democratic constitutional state. In: GutmanA (ed.) Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 106–184.
46.
HameleersMFawziN (2020) Widening the divide between them and us? The effects of populist communication on cognitive and affective stereotyping in a comparative european setting. Political Communication37(5): 612–634.
47.
HansonKO’DwyerE (2019) Patriotism and nationalism, left and right: A Q-methodology study of American national identity. Political Psychology40(4): 777–795.
48.
HochschildAR (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York; London: The New Press.
49.
HuddyL (2016) Unifying national identity research: Interdisciplinary perspectives. In: GrimmJHuddyLSchmidtP, et al (eds) Dynamics of National Identity: Media and Societal Factors of What We Are. London: Routledge, pp. 9–21.
50.
HuddyLKhatibN (2007) American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 63–77.
51.
InglehartRNorrisP (2017) Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics15(2): 443–454.
52.
ISSP Research Group (2015) International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III—ISSP 2013. Lausanne: ISSP Research Group.
53.
KesslerTMummendeyAKlinkA (1999) Soziale Identität und relative Deprivation: Determinanten indiviudellen und kollektiven Verhaltens in Ostdeutschland nach der Vereinigung. In: SchmittMMontadaL (eds) Gerechtigkeitserleben im Wiedervereinigten Deutschland. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, pp. 213–262.
54.
KostermanRFeshbachS (1989) Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology10(2): 257–274.
55.
LenardPTMillerD (2018) Trust and national identity. In: UslanerEM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–74.
56.
LubbersMCoendersM (2017) Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe. European Union Politics18(1): 98–118.
57.
MarchlewskaMCichockaAPanayiotouO, et al (2018) Populism as identity politics. Social Psychological and Personality Science9(2): 151–162.
58.
MarcusGEValentinoNAVasilopoulosP, et al (2019) Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology40(S1): 109–139.
59.
MeitingerK (2018) What does the general national pride item measure? Insights from web probing. International Journal of Comparative Sociology59(5–6): 428–450.
60.
MertonRK (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
61.
MeulemanBAbtsKSchmidtP, et al (2020) Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(3): 593–611.
62.
MohrenbergSHuberRAFreyburgT (2021) Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy. Party Politics27(3): 528–539.
63.
MußotterM (2021) We do not measure what we aim to measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism. Quality & Quantity. Epub ahead of print 29 July. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01212-9.
64.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (2018) Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693.
65.
MuldoonOTTrewKDevineP (2020) Flagging difference: Identification and emotional responses to national flags. Journal of Applied Social Psychology50: 265–275.
66.
MummendeyAKesslerTKlinkA, et al (1999) Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(2): 229–245.
67.
MutzDC (2018) Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115(19): 4330–4339.
68.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
OsborneDMilojevPSibleyCG (2017) Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin43(8): 1086–1099.
70.
OskooiiKA (2020) Perceived discrimination and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science50(3): 867–892.
71.
PettigrewTF (1967) Social evaluation theory. In: LevineD (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 241–311.
72.
PettigrewTF (2015) Samuel Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly78(1): 7–24.
73.
PettigrewTF (2016) In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology67: 1–21.
74.
PettigrewTFChristOWagnerU, et al (2008) Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues64(2): 385–401.
75.
PowerSA (2018) The deprivation-protest paradox: How the perception of unfair economic inequality leads to civic unrest. Current Anthropology59(6): 765–789.
76.
RappC (2020) National attachments and the immigrant participation gap. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(13): 2818–2840.
77.
RuncimanWG (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
78.
SchatzRStaubE (1997) Manifestations of blind and constructive patriotism: Personality correlates and individual group relations. In: Bar-TalDStaubE (eds) Patriotism in the Lives of Individuals and Nations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 229–246.
79.
SchatzRStaubELavineH (1999) On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology20(1): 151–174.
80.
SchmuckDMatthesJ (2017) Effects of economic and symbolic threat appeals in right-wing populist advertising on anti-immigrant attitudes: The impact of textual and visual appeals. Political Communication34(4): 607–626.
81.
SekerdejMRoccasS (2016) Love versus loving criticism: Disentangling conventional and constructive patriotism. The British Journal of Social Psychology55(3): 499–521.
82.
ShayoM (2009) A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review103(2): 147–174.
83.
SidaniusJPrattoFMitchellM (1994) In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. The Journal of Social Psychology134(2): 151–167.
84.
SimonsenKBBonikowskiB (2020) Is civic nationalism necessarily inclusive? Conceptions of nationhood and anti-Muslim attitudes in Europe. European Journal of Political Research59(1): 114–136.
85.
SmithHJHuoYJ (2014) Relative deprivation. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences1(1): 231–238.
86.
SmithHJPettigrewTFPippinGM, et al (2012) Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review16(3): 203–232.
87.
SpryCHornseyM (2007) The influence of blind and constructive patriotism on attitudes toward multiculturalism and immigration. Australian Journal of Psychology59(3): 151–158.
88.
StaubE (1997) Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. In: Bar-TalDStaubE (eds) Patriotism in the Lives of Individuals and Nations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 213–228.
89.
StoufferSASuchmanEADeVinneyLC, et al (1949) The American Soldier; Vol. 1. Adjustment during Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
TajfelH (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33(1): 1–39.
91.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinW (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 33–47.
92.
ThompsonJ (2021) What it means to be a “true American”: Ethnonationalism and voting in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Nations and Nationalism27(1): 279–297.
93.
UrbanskaKGuimondS (2018) Swaying to the extreme: Group relative deprivation predicts voting for an extreme right party in the French Presidential Election. International Review of Social Psychology31(1): 1–12.
94.
VerdugoRMilneA (2016) Introduction. In: VerdugoRMilneA (eds) National Identity: Theory and Research. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 1–24.
95.
WalkerIPettigrewTF (1984) Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology23(4): 301–310.
96.
Willis-EsquedaCDelgadoRHPedrozaK (2017) Patriotism and the impact on perceived threat and immigration attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology157(1): 114–125.
97.
WoodsETSchertzerRGreenfeldL, et al (2020) COVID-19, nationalism, and the politics of crisis: A scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism26: 807–825.
98.
WuttkeASchimpfCSchoenH (2020) When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review114(2): 356–374.
99.
YoxonBvan HauwaertSMKiessJ (2019) Picking on immigrants: A cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice. Acta Politica54(3): 479–520.
100.
ZubielevitchESibleyCGOsborneD (2020) Chicken or the egg? A cross-lagged panel analysis of group identification and group-based relative deprivation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations23(7): 1032–1048.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
