In this study, we focus on attitudes towards asylum seekers in two countries: Denmark and Israel. Both serve as interesting cases through which to study public sentiment of host populations for people seeking refuge. We examine the role of three core dimensions that have been relatively overlooked in previous studies: social contact with asylum seekers, the role of support for humanitarian policies and perceptions of legitimacy of the asylum seekers’ claims. We also gauge the way perceptions of threat mediate the effect of these core dimensions on individuals’ willingness to share their national benefits with those looking for refugee status in the two countries. For the analysis, we use multiple group structural equation modelling. On the descriptive level, findings suggest that respondents are considerably more hostile in Israel than in Denmark, although the mechanisms leading to the formation of exclusionary attitudes are partly similar. We conclude with some limitations of the study and closing remarks about similarities and differences across the two countries.
ArbuckleJL (1995–2009) AMOS 18 User’s Guide. Crawfordville, FL: SPSS Inc.
2.
Bar-TalD (2000) Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
BigoD (2002) Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political27(1): S63–S92.
4.
BillietJMeulemanBDe WitteH (2016) The relation between ethnic threat and economic insecurity in times of economic crisis: Analysis of ESS 2010 data. Presentation at the 3rd international ESS conference: Understanding key challenges for European societies in the 21st century, 13–15 July, Amphimax, University of Lausanne, Lausanne.
5.
BollenKA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
6.
BrownTA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analyses for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
ByrneBM (2013) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
8.
ByrneBMShavelsonRJMuthénB (1989) Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin105: 456–466.
9.
Canetti-NisimDArielyGHalperinE (2008) Life, pocketbook, or culture: The role of perceived security threats in promoting exclusionist political attitudes toward minorities in Israel. Political Research Quarterly61(1): 90–103.
10.
ChenFF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling14(3): 464–504.
11.
CoendersM (2001) Nationalistic Attitudes and Ethnic Exclusionism in a Comparative Perspective. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
12.
CrepazMMLDamronR (2009) Constructing tolerance? How the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comparative Political Studies42(3): 437–463.
13.
D’AppolloniaAC (2012) Frontiers of Fear: Immigration and Insecurity in the United States and Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
DauvergneC (1999) Amorality and humanitarianism in immigration law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal37(3): 597–623.
15.
DavidovEMeulemanBCieciuchJ. (2014) Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology40: 55–75.
16.
DavidovESchmidtPSchwartzSH (2008) Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly72(3): 420–445.
17.
DumanYH (2015) Infiltrators Go home! explaining xenophobic mobilization against asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of International Migration and Integration16: 1231–1254.
18.
EmmeneggerPKlemmensenR (2013) What motivates you? The relationship between preferences for redistribution and attitudes toward immigration. Comparative Politics45(2): 227–246.
19.
EnochY (1994) The intolerance of a tolerant people: Ethnic relations in Denmark. Ethnic and Racial Studies17(2): 282–300.
20.
EssesVMDovidioJFJacksonLM. (2001) The immigration dilemma: The Role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues57(3): 389–412.
21.
EssesVMVeenvlietSHodsonG. (2008) Justice, morality, and the dehumanization of refugees. Social Justice Research21(1): 4–25.
22.
EveryD (2008) A reasonable, practical and moderate humanitarianism: The co-option of humanitarianism in the Australian asylum seeker debates. Journal of Refugee Studies21(2): 210–229.
23.
EveryDAugoustinosM (2007) Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers. Discourse & Society18(4): 411–436.
24.
FeldmanSSteenbergen-MarcoR (2001) The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science45(3): 658–677.
25.
FitzgeraldJCurtisKACorlissCL (2012) Anxious publics worries about crime and immigration. Comparative Political Studies45(4): 477–506.
26.
GalJ (2008) Immigration and the categorical welfare state in Israel. Social Service Review82(4): 639–661.
27.
GibneyMJ (2004) The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GivensTLuedtkeA (2005) European immigration policies in comparative perspective: Issue salience, partisanship and immigrant rights. Comparative European Politics3(1): 1–22.
HaslamNPedersenA (2007) Attitudes towards asylum seekers: The psychology of exclusion. In: Yearning to Breathe Free: Seeking Asylum in Australia. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Federation Press, pp. 208–218.
31.
HeathAFordR (2016) How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?Paper presented at the 3rd international ESS conference: Understanding key challenges for European societies in the 21st century, 13–15th July, Amphimax, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
32.
HjermM (2007) Do numbers really count? Group threat theory revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies33(8): 1253–1275.
33.
HochmanO (2015) Infiltrators or asylum seekers? Framing and attitudes toward asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies13(4): 358–378.
34.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6: 1–55.
35.
HuddyLFeldmanSCapelosT. (2002) The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. International Society of Political Psychology23: 485–509.
36.
KalirB (2014) The Jewish state of anxiety: Between moral obligation and fearism in the treatment of African asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(4): 580–598.
37.
KatzIHassRG (1988) Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55(6): 893–905.
38.
KritzmanTKempA (2008) Founding of a refugee regime in Israel: Between state and civil society. Haatsama Bemishpat55–90 [in Hebrew].
39.
Kritzman-AmirT (2015) Introduction. In: Kritzman-AmirT (ed.) Where Levinsky Meets Asmara: Social and Legal Aspects of Israeli Asylum Policy. Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute, pp. 9–40.
40.
KuntzADavidovESemyonovM (2017) The dynamic relations between economic conditions and anti-immigrant sentiment: A natural experiment in times of the European economic crisis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Epub ahead of print 13 February. DOI: 10.1177/0020715217690434.
41.
LeongCHWardC (2006) Cultural values and attitudes toward immigrants and multiculturalism: The case of the Eurobarometer survey on racism and xenophobia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations30(6): 799–810.
42.
LewisM (2005) Asylum: Understanding Public Attitudes. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
43.
LouisWRDuckJMTerryDJ. (2007) Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers. European Journal of Social Psychology37(1): 53–73.
44.
McKayFHThomasSLKneeboneS (2012) ‘It would be okay if they came through the proper channels’: Community perceptions and attitudes toward asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies25(1): 113–133.
45.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces81(3): 909–936.
46.
MonnickendamMGordonD (2010) Poverty, government policy and public opinion in Britain and Israel: A comparative analysis. Social Policy & Administration44(5): 554–574.
47.
MooreHF (2010) Immigration in Denmark and Norway: Protecting culture or protecting rights?Scandinavian Studies82(3): 355–364.
48.
MouritsenPOlsenTV (2013) Liberalism and the diminishing space of tolerance. In: DobbernackJModoodT (eds) Tolerance, Intolerance and Respect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 127–156.
49.
Østergaard-NielsenE (2003) Counting the cost: Denmark’s changing migration policies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27(2): 448–454.
50.
OyamotCMFisherELDeasonG. (2012) Attitudes toward immigrants: The interactive role of the authoritarian predisposition, social norms, and humanitarian values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology48(1): 97–105.
51.
PantojaA (2006) Against the tide? Core American values and attitudes toward US immigration policy in the mid-1990s. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(3): 515–531.
52.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49: 65–85.
53.
PettigrewTFTroppL (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
54.
Population and Immigration Authority (2016) Data regarding foreign nationals in Israel. Report no. 2/2016. Population, Immigration and Border Authority. Jerusalem, Israel: The Ministry of Interior [in Hebrew].
55.
QuillianL (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review60(4): 586–611.
56.
RaijmanR (2013) Foreigners and outsiders: Exclusionist attitudes towards labour migrants in Israel. International Migration51(1): 136–151.
57.
RaijmanRDavidovESchmidtP. (2008) What does a nation owe non-citizens? National attachments, perception of threat and attitudes towards granting citizenship rights in a comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(2–3): 195–220.
58.
RaijmanRSemyonovMSchmidtP (2003) Do foreigners deserve rights? Determinants of public views towards foreigners in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review19(4): 379–392.
59.
RosenhekZ (2000) Migration regimes, intra-state conflicts, and the politics of exclusion and inclusion: Migrant workers in the Israeli welfare state. Social Problems47(1): 49–67.
60.
SchaferJLGrahamJW (2002) Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods7: 147–177.
61.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMCoendersM (2002) Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review18(1): 17–34.
62.
SchlüterEMeulemanBDavidovE (2013) Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: A multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European countries. Social Science Research42(3): 670–682.
63.
SchneiderT (2012) In ten years we will live here with half a million Muslim infiltrators from Africa: It is easiest for the ‘gentle souls’ from northern Tel Aviv to call for accepting them, but they arrive to Ashdod and to the Galilee. Globes, 1May. Available at: http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000744969. [in Hebrew].
64.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2006) The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review71(3): 426–449.
65.
SmoohaS (1997) Ethnic democracy: Israel as an archetype. Israel Studies2(2): 198–241.
66.
StathamP (2003) Understanding anti-asylum rhetoric: Restrictive politics or racist publics?The Political Quarterly74: 163–177.
67.
StephanWGStephanCW (2000) An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In: OskampS (ed.) Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 23–45.
68.
StephanWGYbarraOMartnezCM. (1998) Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology29(4): 559–576.
69.
The Danish Immigration Service (2014) Statistical Overview – Migration and Asylum 2013. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs.
70.
TogebyL (1998) Prejudice and tolerance in a period of increasing ethnic diversity and growing unemployment: Denmark since 1970. Ethnic and Racial Studies21(6): 1137–1154.
71.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2015) Asylum Trends 2014 – Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. Geneva: UNHCR.
72.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2016) Global Trends – Forced Displacement in 2015. Geneva: UNHCR.
73.
ValentineGSportonDNielsenKB (2009) Identities and belonging: A study of Somali refugee and asylum seekers living in the UK and Denmark. Environment and Planning, Society and Space27(2): 234–250.
74.
Van Der WaalJDe KosterWVan OorschotW (2013) Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice15(2): 164–181.
75.
Van OorschotWUunkW (2007) Multi-level determinants of the public’s informal solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. In: MauSVeghteB (eds) Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 217–238.
76.
VerkuytenM (2004) Emotional reactions to and support for immigrant policies: Attributed responsibilities to categories of asylum seekers. Social Justice Research17(3): 293–314.
77.
WagnerUVan DickRPettigrewTF. (2003) Ethnic prejudice in east and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6(1): 22–36.
