This article examines the causes of criminalization of forced marriage in European countries. The first part of the article locates the debate on forced marriage within the wider discourse of immigration, national identity, and women’s rights. The second part uses qualitative comparative analysis to analyze 29 European nations, 20 of which criminalized forced marriage. Our findings indicate that criminalization of forced marriage emerges out of a complex set of conditions and the causal recipes differ for early (before 2013) and late adopters (after 2013) of the policy of criminalization. For nations in which criminalization policy was adopted before 2013, the intermingling of world cultural, feminist, and right-wing policies is the main causal mechanism. For the late adopters, a similar causal path fails to emerge indicating that criminalization became normative in European policy environment. In other words, late adopters simply mimic others.
AkkermanTHagelundA (2007) ‘Women and children first!’ Anti-immigration parties and gender in Norway and the Netherlands. Patterns of Prejudice41(2): 197–214.
2.
Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA) (2016) The Association of Religion Data Archives | National Profiles | Data Sources. Available at: http://www.thearda.com/internationalData/datasource.asp (accessed 8 July 2016).
3.
BakkerREdwardsEHoogheL. (2015a) 2010 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina. Available at: chesdata.eu
4.
BakkerREdwardsEHoogheL. (2015b) 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey: Version 2015.1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina. Available at: chesdata.eu
BredalA (2005) Tackling forced marriages in the Nordic Countries: Between women’s rights and immigration control. In: HossainSLynnW (eds) ‘Honour’: Crimes, Paradigms and Violence against Women. London: Zed Books. pp. 332–354.
7.
DöringHManowP (2012) Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov).
8.
DustinMPhillipsA (2008) Whose agenda is it? Abuses of women and abuses of ‘culture’ in Britain. Ethnicities8(3): 405–424.
9.
EnrightM (2009) Choice, culture and the politics of belonging: The emerging law of forced and arranged marriage. The Modern Law Review72(3): 331–359.
10.
Equality Now (2014) Protecting the Girl Child – Using the law to end child, early and forced marriage and related human rights violations. Available at: http://www.equalitynow.org/childmarriagereport
11.
FairLS (2010) Why can’t I get married?’ – Denmark and the ‘Twenty-four year law’. Social & Cultural Geography11(2): 139–153.
12.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(04): 887–917.
13.
Foreign Commonwealth Office (2012) Forced marriage to become a criminal offense, June8. London: Foreign Commonwealth Office.
14.
GangoliGChantlerK (2009) Protecting victims of forced marriage: Is age a protective factor?Feminist Legal Studies17(3): 267–288.
15.
HaenenI (2014) Force & Marriage: The Criminalisation of Forced Marriage in Dutch, English and International Criminal Law. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Home Affairs Committee (2008) Domestic Violence, Forced marriage and ‘Honour-Based’ Violence (No. HC 263). London: House of Commons.
18.
JoppkeC (2004) The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. The British Journal of Sociology55(2): 237–257.
19.
KeckMESikkinkK (1999) Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal51(159): 89–101.
20.
KoolRSB (2012) Step Forward, or Forever Hold Your Peace: Penalising Forced Marriages in the Netherlands (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 2306065). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2306065
21.
KrookM (2010) Women’s representation in parliament: A qualitative comparative analysis. Political Studies58(5): 886–908.
22.
LechnerFBoliJ (2005) World Culture: Origins and Consequences, 1st edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
MatthiasMD (2013) The sacralization of the individual: Human rights and the abolition of the death penalty. American Journal of Sociology118(5): 1246–1283.
24.
MeretSSiimB (2013) Gender, populism and politics of belonging: Discourses of right-wing populist parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. In: SiimBMokreM (eds) Negotiating Gender and Diversity in an Emergent European Public Sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 78–96.
25.
MeyerJW (2010) World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology36: 1–20.
26.
PayneRA (2001) Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations7(1): 37–61.
PsailaELeighVVerbariM. (2016) Forced Marriage from a Gender Perspective (No. PE 556.926). Brussels: European Parliament Policy Department C.
31.
RaginCC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
RaginCC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
RaginCCRubinsonC (2009) The distinctiveness of comparative research. In: LandmanTRobinsonN (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics. London: SAGE, pp. 13–34.
34.
RazackSH (2004) Imperilled Muslim women, dangerous Muslim men and civilised Europeans: Legal and social responses to forced marriages. Feminist Legal Studies12(2): 129–174.
35.
RubinsonC (2013) Contradictions in fsQCA. Quality & Quantity47(5): 2847–2867.
36.
SabbeATemmermanMBremsE. (2014) Forced marriage: An analysis of legislation and political measures in Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change62(2): 171–189.
37.
SchneiderCQWagemannC (2010) Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology9(3): 397–418.
38.
SchoferEHironakaAFrankDJ. (2012) Sociological institutionalism and world society. In: AmentaENashKScottA (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology. Chichester: John Wiley57–68.
39.
Secretary of State (2008) Government Reply to the Sixth Report from the Home Affairs Committee (HC 263). London: House of Commons.
40.
TrimikliniotisNDemetriouC (n.d.) European Immigration: A Sourcebook. Aldershot: Ashgate
41.
UrbanekD (2012) Forced marriage vs. family reunification: Nationality, gender and ethnicity in German Migration Policy. Journal of Intercultural Studies33(3): 333–345.
42.
WängnerundL (2009) Women in parliament: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science12(1): 51–69.
YurdakulGKortewegAC (2013) Gender equality and immigrant integration: Honor killing and forced marriage debates in the Netherlands, Germany, and Britain. In: Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 41. Elsevier, pp. 204–214. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539513001325
46.
Yuval-DavisN (2011) The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: SAGE.
