Data from 39 countries for the years 2008–2011 are used to explore how features of a country’s labor market influence sex segregation by field of study in higher education. A new feature of this empirical study is the use of the system generalized method of moments (system-GMM) to analyze these relationships. Two new labor market variables are included in this study: a measure of a country’s economic protections for women and the national unemployment rate. After controlling for the level of economic development and characteristics of each country’s tertiary system, the results indicate that labor market variables have an important impact on sex segregation by field of study. All else equal, countries that protect women’s economic rights are associated with lower levels of sex segregation by field. Although the finding is less robust, the empirical evidence also supports that countries with higher unemployment rates experience lower levels of sex segregation.
AltonjiJGArcidiaconoPMaurelA (2015) The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, October.
2.
AltonjiJGBlomEMeghirC (2012) Heterogeneity in human capital investments: High school curriculum, college major, and careers. Annual Review of Economics4(1): 185–223.
3.
ArellanoMBondS (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–297.
4.
BaroneC (2011) Some things never change: Gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociology of Education84(2): 157–176.
5.
BarroR (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics106(2): 407–443.
6.
BarroRLeeJ (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Developmental Economics104: 184–198.
7.
BarroRSala-i-MartinX (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
BazziSClemensMA (2013) Blunt instruments: Avoiding common pitfalls in identifying the causes of economic growth. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics5(2): 152–186.
9.
BeckUBeck-GernsheimE (2001) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
BeckerGS (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BedardKHermanDA (2008) Who goes to graduate/professional school? The importance of economic fluctuations, undergraduate field, and ability. Economics of Education Review27(2): 197–210.
12.
BeffyMFougreDMaurelA (2012) Choosing the field of study in post-secondary education: Do expected earnings matter?The Review of Economics and Statistics94(1): 334–347.
13.
BellerA (1982) Occupational segregation by sex: Determinants and changes. The Journal of Human Resources117(3): 371–392.
14.
BerikGvan der Meulen RodgersYSequinoS (2009) Feminist economics of inequality, development, and growth. Feminist Economics15(3): 1–33.
15.
BettsJRMcFarlandLL (1995) Safe port in a storm: The impact of labor market conditions on community college enrollments. Journal of Human Resources30(4): 741–765.
16.
BlomECadenaBCKeysBJ (2015) Investment over the business cycle: Insights from college major choice. Discussion paper no. 9167, July. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
17.
BlundellRBondS (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics87: 115–143.
18.
Bobbitt-ZeherD (2007) The gender income gap and the role of education. Sociology of Education80(1): 1–22.
19.
BradleyK (2000) The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes?Sociology of Education73(1): 1–18.
20.
BradleyKCharlesM (2004) Uneven inroads: Understanding women’s status in higher education, 1965-1985. Research in Sociology of Education14: 247–274.
21.
BradleyKRamirezFO (1996) World polity and gender parity: Women’s share of higher education, 1965-1985. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization11: 63–91.
22.
BraunsteinE (2014) Patriarchy versus Islam: Gender and religion in economic growth. Feminist Economics20(4): 58–86.
23.
BreenRGarcia-PenalosaC (2002) Bayesian learning and gender segregation. Journal of Labor Economics20(4): 899–922.
24.
BuchmannCDiPreteTA (2006) The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review71: 515–541.
25.
CatsambisS (1994) The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics preparation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education67: 199–215.
26.
CharlesM (1992) Cross-national variation in occupational segregation. American Sociological Review57: 483–502.
27.
CharlesMBradleyK (2002) Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review67(4): 573–599.
28.
CharlesMBradleyK (2009) Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology114(4): 924–976.
29.
CharlesMGruskyDB (1995) Models for describing the underlying structure of sex segregation. American Journal of Sociology100: 931–971.
30.
CharlesMGruskyDB (2004) Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
CoorayAPotrafkeN (2011) Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or culture and religion?European Journal of Political Economy27(2): 268–280.
32.
CorrellSJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Journal of Sociology69: 93–113.
33.
CorrigallEKonradA (2007) Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles56: 847–855.
34.
CotterDHermsenJVannemanR (2011) The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. Journal of Sociology117(1): 259–289.
35.
Datta GuptaNSmithNVernerM (2008) The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Review of Economics of the Household8: 65–89.
36.
DaviesSGuppyN (1997) Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social Forces75: 1417–1438.
37.
Della FaveLR (1980) The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of social stratification. American Sociological Review45: 955–971.
38.
DoepkeMTertiltMVoenaA (2011) The economics and politics of women’s rights. NBER Working Paper Series, Working paper no. 17672, December. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
DynarskiS (2008) Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources43(3): 576–610.
40.
EnglandP (2005) Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology31: 381–399.
41.
Estèvez-AbeMIversenTSoskiceD (2003) Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In: HallPSoskiceD (eds) The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–183.
42.
FaulknerW (2007) ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science37: 331–356.
43.
FortinN (2005) Gender role attitudes and labour market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy21(3): 416–438.
44.
FrankDJMeyerJ (2007) Worldwide expansion and change in the university. In: KrückenGKosmützkyATorkaM (eds) Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions. Bielefeld: Transcrpit Verlag, pp. 19–42.
45.
FrehillL (1997) Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering. The Sociological Quarterly38(2): 225–249.
46.
García-AracilA (2008) College major and the gender earnings gap: A multi-country examination of postgraduate labor market outcomes. Research in Higher Education49(8): 733–757.
47.
GecasV (1991) The self-concept as a basis for a theory of motivation. In: HowardJACalleroPL (eds) The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–187.
48.
GeddesRLueckDTennysonS (2012) Human capital accumulation and the expansion of women’s economic rights. The Journal of Law & Economics55(4): 839–867.
49.
GemiciAWiswallM (2014) Evolution of gender differences in post-secondary human capital investments. International Economic Review55(1): 23–56.
50.
GoodeWJ (1963) World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
51.
HansenMN (1997) The Scandinavian welfare state model: The impact of the public sector on segregation and gender equality. Work, Employment and Society11(1): 83–99.
52.
HershbeinBJ (2012) Graduating high school in a recession: Work, education, and home production. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy12(1): 1–32.
53.
InglehartR (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
InglehartRNorrisP (2003) Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
InkelesASmithDH (1974) Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
JacobsJA (1996) Gender inequality in higher education. Annual Review of Sociology22: 153–185.
57.
JaumotteF (2003) Labor force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies37(2): 51–108.
58.
JohnsonMT (2013) The impact of business cycle fluctuations on graduate school enrollment. Economics of Education Review34: 122–134.
KahnLB (2010) The long-term labor market consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy. Labour Economics17(2): 303–316.
61.
KlasenSLamannaF (2009) The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: New evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics15(3): 91–132.
62.
Kontogiannopoulou-PolydoridesF (1991) Greece. In: WilsonM (ed.) Girls and Young Women in Education. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 91–113.
63.
LeachF (1998) Gender, education and training: An international perspective. Gender and Development6(2): 9–18.
64.
MeyerJWJeppersonRL (2000) The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory18: 100–120.
65.
MurrayMP (2006) Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives20(4): 111–132.
66.
NortonSWTomalA (2009) Religion and female educational attainment. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking41(5): 961–986.
67.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006) Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
68.
PlateauN (1991) French-speaking Belgium. In: WilsonM (ed.) Girls and Young Women in Education. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 15–40.
69.
PolacheckWP (1978) Sex differences in college major. ILR Review31(4): 498–508.
70.
PolachekSW (1981) Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure. The Review of Economics and Statistics63(1): 60–69.
71.
PsacharopoulosG (1994) Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development22(9): 1325–1343.
72.
RamirezFOWotipkaCM (2001) Slowly by surely? The global expansion of women’s participation in science and engineering fields of study, 1972-1992. Sociology of Education74(3): 231–251.
73.
RawlingsCM (2007) Higher education as a prism: The role of organizational structures in the gender segregation and the stratification of American undergraduates, 1970–1995. Working paper, Department of Sociology, University of California – Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 8May.
74.
RidgewayCL (2006) Gender as an organizing force in social relations: Implications for the future of inequality. In: BlauFDBrintonMCGruskyDB (eds) The Declining Significance of Gender?New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 265–287.
75.
RoksaJ (2005) Double disadvantage or blessing in disguise? Understanding the relationship between college major and employment sector. Sociology of Education78(3): 207–232.
76.
RoodmanD (2009) How to do Xtabond 2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal9(1): 86–136.
77.
RuberyJGrimshawDFaganC. (2004) Gender mainstreaming and the European employment strategy. Synthesis report by the European expert group on gender, social inclusion and employment, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, November.
78.
SchoferEMeyerJW (2005) The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review51: 1–17.
79.
SchoferERamirezFOMeyerJW (2000) The effects of science on national economic development. American Sociological Review65(6): 866–867.
80.
ShavitYArumRGamoranA (eds) (2007) Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
81.
SmythESteinmetzS (2008) Field of study and gender segregation in European labour markets. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(4–5): 257–281.
82.
StaniecJFO (2004) The effects of race, sex, and expected returns on the choice of college major. Eastern Economic Journal30(4): 549–592.
Stolte-HeiskanenV (1991) Women in Science. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
85.
ThomasSLZhangL (2005) Post-baccalaureate wage growth within 4 years of graduation: The effects of college quality on college major. Research in Higher Education46(4): 437–459.
86.
United Nations Development Programme (2015) Human Development Report 2015: Work for Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
87.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2012) International Standard Classification of Education 2011. Paris: UNESCO.
World Bank (2011) World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
90.
XieYShaumanKA (2003) Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91.
ZafarB (2013) College major choice and the gender gap. Journal of Human Resources48(3): 545–595.
92.
ZellnerH (1975) The determinants of occupational segregation. In: LloydCB (ed.) Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 133–143.
