Hundreds of millions of people live in weak states that are functionally incapable of protecting their citizens, yet few studies consider the implications of state weakness for human rights practices. Using data for 134 countries between 1984 and 2010, I construct a factor-analytic score of bureaucratic capacity and use it to analyze two categories of human rights: bodily integrity and civil liberties. Results from multivariate regression analyses show that bodily integrity outcomes improve as the quality and strength of a state’s institutions increase, independently of democracy and other key determinants. Bureaucratic capacity also promotes respect for civil liberties, but only in conjunction with executive constraints or competitive elections. When democratic mechanisms are absent, enhanced state capacity results in worse civil liberties practices. Supplementary analyses using instrumental variables rule out the possibility of reverse causality between bureaucratic capacity and human rights.
AchenCH (2001) Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables (unpublished manuscript). Department of Politics, Princeton University. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Achen121201/achen.pdf (accessed 20 January 2016).
2.
AlbertusMMenaldoV (2012) Coercive capacity and the prospects for democratization. Comparative Politics44(2): 151–169.
ArendtH (1994) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin.
5.
BäckHHadeniusA (2008) Democracy and state capacity: Exploring a J-shaped relationship. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions21(1): 1–24.
6.
BanksASWilsonKA (2013) Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem, Israel: Databanks International.
7.
BerlinerDGreenleafALakeM. (2015) Building capacity, building rights? State capacity and labor rights in developing countries. World Development72: 127–139.
8.
BesleyTPerssonT (2010) State capacity, conflict, and development. Econometrica78(1): 1–34.
9.
BlantonSL (1999) The transfer of arms and the diffusion of democracy: Do arms promote or undermine the ‘Third Wave’?Social Science Journal36(3): 413–429.
10.
BoharaAKMitchellNJNepalM. (2008) Human rights violations, corruption, and the policy of repression. Policy Studies Journal36(1): 1–18.
11.
BörzelTARisseT (2013) Human rights in areas of limited statehood: The new agenda. In: RisseTRoppSSikkinkK (eds) From Commitment to Compliance: The Persistent Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–84.
British Broadcasting Corporation (2013) China employs two million microblog monitors state media say. BBC News, 4October. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-24396957 (accessed 7 January 2016).
14.
Bueno de MequitaBDownsGSmithA. (2005) Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly49: 439–457.
15.
CallaghyT (1987) The state as lame leviathan: The patrimonial-administrative state in Africa. In: ErgasZ (ed.) African State in Transition. London: Macmillan, pp. 87–116.
16.
Chase-DunnC (1998) Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
CheibubJA (1998) Political regimes and the extractive capacity of governments: Taxation in democracies and dictatorships. World Politics50: 349–376.
18.
CingranelliDRichardsD (1999) Respect for human rights after the end of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research36(5): 511–534.
19.
CingranelliDRichardsD (2010) The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Human Rights Quarterly32(2): 401–424.
20.
CingranelliDRichardsDChadCK (2014) Short variable descriptions for indicators in the Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. Available at: www.humanrightsdata.com (accessed 9 October 2014).
21.
ClarkAMSikkinkK (2013) Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures?Human Rights Quarterly35(3): 539–568.
22.
ColeWM (2012a) A civil religion for world Society: The direct and diffuse effects of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. Sociological Forum27(4): 937–960.
23.
ColeWM (2012b) Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. American Journal of Sociology117(4): 1131–1171.
24.
ColeWM (2015a) Institutionalizing a global anti-corruption regime: Perverse effects on country outcomes, 1984 to 2012. International Journal of Comparative Sociology56(1): 53–80.
25.
ColeWM (2015b) Mind the gap: State capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. International Organization69(2): 405–441.
26.
ColeWMRamirezFO (2013) Conditional decoupling: Assessing the impact of national human rights institutions, 1981 to 2004. American Sociological Review78(4): 702–725.
27.
ConradCMooreWH (2010) What stops the torture?American Journal of Political Science54(2): 459–476.
28.
ConradCRHaglundJMooreWH (2013) Disaggregating torture allegations: Introducing the ill-treatment and torture (ITT) country-year data. International Studies Perspectives14(2): 199–220.
CutrightP (1963) National political development: Measurement and analysis. American Sociological Review28(2): 253–264.
31.
DavenportC (2004) The promise of democratic pacification: An empirical assessment. International Studies Quarterly48(3): 539–650.
32.
DavenportC (2007a) State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
DavenportC (2007b) State repression and the tyrannical peace. Journal of Peace Research44(4): 485–504.
34.
DavenportCArmstrongDII (2004) Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976 to 1996. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 538–554.
35.
de SoysaIJacksonTOrmhaugCM (2010) Tools of the torturer? Small arms imports and repression of human rights, 1992–2004. International Journal of Human Rights14(3): 378–393.
36.
DeMerittJHRYoungJK (2013) A political economy of human rights: Oil, natural gas, and state incentives to repress. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(2): 99–120.
37.
DiamondL (2008) The democratic rollback: The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs87(2): 36–48.
EnglehartN (2005) Is regime change enough for Burma? The problem of state capacity. Asian Survey45(4): 622–644.
40.
EnglehartN (2009) State capacity, state failure, and human rights. Journal of Peace Research46(2): 163–180.
41.
EvansPRauchJ (1999) Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review64(5): 748–765.
42.
FarissCJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review108(2): 297–318.
43.
FazalTM (2007) State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
FearonJLaitinD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
FortinJ (2012) Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in post-communist countries. Comparative Political Studies45(7): 903–930.
47.
Fortin-RittbergerJ (2014) Exploring the relationship between infrastructural and coercive state capacity. Democratization21(7): 1244–1264.
48.
GleditschKSWardMD (1997) Double take: A re-examination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(3): 361–382.
49.
Hafner-BurtonE (2009) Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
Hafner-BurtonETsutsuiK (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology110: 1373–1411.
51.
HansonJK (2015) Democracy and state capacity: Complements or substitutes?Studies in Comparative International Development50: 304–330.
52.
HarffBGurrTR (1988) Toward empirical theory of genocides and politicides: Identification and measurement of cases since 1945. International Studies Quarterly32(3): 359–371.
53.
HathawayO (2002) Do human rights treaties make a difference?Yale Law Journal111: 1935–2042.
54.
HechterM (2000) Containing Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
HegreHEllingsenTGatesS. (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review95(1): 33–48.
56.
HendersonC (1991) Conditions affecting the use of political repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution35: 120–142.
57.
HendersonC (1993) Population pressures and political repression. Social Science Quarterly74: 322–333.
58.
HendrixC (2010) Measuring state capacity: Theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research47(3): 273–285.
59.
HendrixCYoungJ (2014) State capacity and terrorism: A two-dimensional approach. Security Studies23(2): 329–363.
60.
HerbstJ (2000) States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
HillDWJrJonesZM (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. American Political Science Review108(3): 661–687.
62.
HironakaA (2005) Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
Human Rights Watch (1994) Bureaucracy of Repression: The Iraqi Government in Its Own Words. New York: Human Rights Watch.
64.
Human Rights Watch (2008) Chocking on Bureaucracy: State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism. New York: Human Rights Watch.
65.
HuntingtonSP (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
HuntingtonSP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
67.
JacksonR (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
JacksonRRosbergC (1982) Why Africa’s weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics35(1): 1–24.
69.
KeckMSikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
70.
KeithLC (1999) The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior?Journal of Peace Research36: 95–118.
71.
KiserELintonA (2001) Determinants of the growth of the state: War and taxation in early modern France and England. Social Forces80(2): 411–448.
72.
KrainMMyersME (1997) Democracy and civil war: A note on the democratic peace proposition. International Interactions23(1): 109–118.
73.
KrasnerS (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74.
LakeM (2014) Organizing hypocrisy: Providing legal accountability for human rights violations in areas of limited statehood. International Studies Quarterly58: 515–526.
75.
LandmanT (2013) Human Rights and Democracy: The Precarious Triumph of Ideas. London: Bloomsbury.
76.
LiebermanE (2002) Taxation data as indicators of state-society relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research. Studies in Comparative International Development36(4): 89–115.
77.
LutzELSikkinkK (2000) International human rights law and practice in Latin America. International Organization54(3): 633–659.
78.
MannM (1986) The Sources of Social Power, volume I: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79.
MannM (1993) The Sources of Social Power, volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MeyerJWBoliJThomasGM. (1997) World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology103(1): 144–181.
83.
MitchellNMcCormickJM (1988) Economic and political explanations of human rights violations. World Politics40: 476–498.
84.
MøllerJSkaaningS-E (2014) Respect for civil liberties during the third wave of democratization: Presenting a new dataset. Social Indicators Research117: 1069–1087.
NorrisP (2012) Making Democratic Governance Work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity, Welfare, and Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
88.
NorthD (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.
89.
PoeSCTateCN (1994) Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review88(4): 853–872.
90.
PoeSTateNKeithLC (1999) Repression of human rights to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly43: 291–313.
Political Risk Services Group (2008) Researcher’s Dataset (ICRG T3B). Syracuse, NY: The PRS Group, Inc.
93.
PuddingtonAPianoAYoungE. (2011) Freedom in the World 2011: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House and Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.
94.
ReganPHendersonE (2002) Democracy, threats and political repression in developing countries: Are democracies internally less violent?Third World Quarterly23(1): 119–136.
95.
RichardsDLWebbAClayKC (2015) Respect for physical-integrity rights in the twenty-first century: Evaluating Poe and Tate’s model 20 years later. Journal of Human Rights14: 291–311.
96.
RoseRShinDC (2001) Democratization backwards: The problem of third-wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science31: 331–354.
97.
RossML (2012) The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
98.
RueschemeyerDEvansP (1985) The state and economic transformation: Toward an analysis of the conditions underlying effective intervention. In: EvansPRueschemeyerD. (eds) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–77.
99.
SobekD (2010) Masters of their domains: The role of state capacity in civil wars. Journal of Peace Research47(3): 267–271.
100.
SoiferHvom HauM (2008) Unpacking the strength of the state: The utility of state infrastructural power. Studies in Comparative International Development43: 219–230.
101.
Solt Frederick (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 231–242.
102.
StockJHYogoM (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many weak instruments. In: AndrewsDWKStockJH (eds) Identification and Inference for Econometric Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–120.
103.
StrayerJR (2005) On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
TaydasZPeksenD (2012) Can states buy peace? Social welfare spending and civil conflicts. Journal of Peace Research49(2): 273–287.
106.
ThiesC (2010) Of rulers, rebels, and revenue: State capacity, civil war onset, and primary commodities. Journal of Peace Research47: 321–332.
107.
TillyC (1992) Coercion, Capital, and European States, A.D. 990–1992. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
108.
TillyC (2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
109.
TillyC (2007) Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110.
VadlamannatiKCPathmalalKKSL (2010) Exploring the relationship between military spending and human rights performance in South Asia. International Journal of Human Rights14(2): 147–165.
111.
WawroGJSamiiCKristensenIP (2011) On the Use of Fixed Effects Estimators for Time-Series Cross-Section Data (unpublished manuscript). Department of Political Science, Columbia University. Available cyrussamii.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/kristensen_etal.pdf (accessed 20 January 2016).
112.
WeberM (1946) Politics as a vocation. In: GerthHHMillsCW (eds) From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–128.
113.
WeberM (1978) Economy and Society (ed RothGWittichC). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
114.
WoodRMGibneyM (2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Human Rights Quarterly32: 367–400.
115.
World Bank (2013) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
116.
YoungJ (2009) State capacity, democracy, and the violation of personal integrity rights. Journal of Human Rights8: 283–300.
117.
ZangerS (2000) A global analysis of the effect of political regime changes on life integrity violations, 1977–1993. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 213–233.
