Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The labour performance of migrants has been largely assumed to vary with individuals’ reasons to migrate. Accordingly, migrants who migrate to join their relatives at destination are commonly expected to be negatively selected in terms of their labour characteristics. However, family and economic reasons for migration are not mutually exclusive but often complementary, especially among women. In addition, there exists a large variation in the post-migration employment rates of the so-called ‘family migrants’. In this article, I argue that the temporal sequence of migration and key family life-cycle events may help us in explaining the post-migration employment patterns of migrants, especially that of females. To test this hypothesis I first construct a comprehensive typology that classifies all immigrants according to the timing of marriage and migration for each spouse, and their immigrant or native origin. Next, I examine the explanatory power of this typology by estimating the employment probability of migrants in multivariate logit regressions that include the resulting types of ‘family migrants’ as independent. The obtained results confirm the theoretical and empirical utility of studying marriage and migration jointly in order to explain differences in the labour performance of immigrant women. Moreover, the main conclusions concerning cross-type differences in female labour behaviour remain valid ever after controlling for current legal status and legal status at entry, and running separate analyses for the main origin groups in Spain.

Keywords

family migration immigrant policy immigrant women labour performance legal status

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akresh IR

( 2006b) Occupational mobility among legal immigrants to the United States. International Migration Review40(4): 854-885.

Baker M.

and

Benjamin D.

( 1997) The role of the family in immigrants’ labor-market activity: An evaluation of alternative explanations. The American Economic Review87(4): 705-727.

Brochmann G and Hammar T (eds) (1999) Mechanisms of Immigration Control . Comparative Analysis of European Regulation Policies. Oxford: Berg.

Cebolla-Boado H.

and

González-Ferrer A.

( 2008) La inmigración en España (2000-2007). De la gestión de flujos a la integración de los inmigrantes . Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y constitucionales.

CeiMigra

(2008) El contingente laboral de trabajadores extranjeros no comunitarios. Observatorio Valenciano de las Migraciones, n° 22.

Cerruti M.

and

Massey D.

( 2001) On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States. Demography38: 187-200.

Constant A.

and

Zimmermann KF

( 2005) Immigrant performance and selective immigration policy: AEuropean perspective. National Institute Economic Review194(1): 94-105.

Cornelius W.

Borger S.

and

Sawyer A.

( 2008) Controlling unauthorized immigration from Mexico. The failure of ‘prevention through deterrence’ and the need for comprehensive reform. Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.

Cortina C.

Esteve A.

and

García T.

( 2009) Migración, ocupación y matrimonio: una aproximación a las relaciones de género de las parejas mixtas en España. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos7124(2): 293-321.

10.

De Bruycker P

(ed.) (2000) Regularisations of Illegal Immigrants in the European Union. Brussels: Bruylant.

11.

Donato KM

and

Kanaiaupuni SM

( 2000) Poverty, demographic change, and women’s migration from Mexico. In:

Garcia B

(ed.) Women, Poverty and Demographic Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 217-242.

12.

Duleep HO

and

Regets MR

( 1993) The decision to work by married immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review46: 677-690.

13.

Duleep HO

and

Regets MR

( 1996) Admission criteria and immigrant earnings profiles. International Migration Review30: 571-590.

14.

Dustmann C.

( 1997) Differences in the labour market behaviour between temporary and permanent migrant women. Labour Economics4(1): 29-46.

15.

González-Ferrer A.

( 2006a) Family and labour strategies in migration. Family reunification, marital choices and labour participation of immigrants in the host country. Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, 57.

16.

González-Ferrer A.

( 2006b) Who do immigrants marry? Partner choice of single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review22: 171-185.

17.

González-Ferrer A.

( 2008) La reagrupación familiar en España. Algunas cifras para el debate. Anuario de Inmigración2008. CIDOB, Barcelona, pp. 120-138.

18.

González-Ferrer A.

( 2011) The reunification of the spouse among recent immigrants in Spain. Links with undocumented migration and the labour market. In:

Kraler A

Kofman E

Kohli M

and

Schmoll C

(eds) Gender, Generations and the Family in International Migration. Amsterdam: IMISCOE-AUP Book Series, 143-166.

19.

Hatch P.

( 2006) Immigration policy: Family reunification. LWVUS Immigration Study, Background Articles.

20.

Hondagneu-Sotelo P.

( 1994) Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration . Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

Jasso G.

and

Rosenzweig MR

( 1997) Do immigrants screened for skills do better than family reunification immigrants? International Migration Review29: 85-111.

22.

Kanaiaupuni S.

( 1995) The Role of Women in Migration: Household Organizational Strategies of Mexican Families. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Long J.

( 1980) The effect of Americanization on earnings: Some evidence for women. Journal of Political Economy88: 620-629.

24.

Massey D.

Alarcón R.

Durán J.

and

González H.

( 1987) Return to Aztlán: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

25.

Massey D.

and

Bartley K.

( 2006) The changing legal status distribution of immigrants: A caution. International Migration Review39(2): 469-484.

26.

Massey D.

Duran J.

and

Malone NJ

( 2003) Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

27.

Meng X.

and

Gregory RG

( 2005) Intermarriage and the economic assimilation of immigrants . Journal of Labour Economics23(1): 135-175.

28.

Mincer J.

( 1978) Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy86: 743-749.

29.

Nielsen HS

Smith N.

and

Çelikaksoy A.

( 2007) The effect of marriage on education of immigrants: Evidence from a policy reform restricting spouse import. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2899.

30.

Parrado E.

( 2004) International migration and men’s marriage in Western Mexico. Journal of Comparative Family Studies35: 51-72.

31.

Sandell SH

( 1977) Women and the economics of family migration. Review of Economics and Statistics59: 406-414.

32.

Stier H.

and

Tienda M.

( 1992) Family, work and women: The labor supply of Hispanic immigrant wives. International Migration Review26: 1291-1313.

33.

Zlotnik H.

( 1995a) The south-to-north migration of women. International Migration Review29: 229-254.

34.

Zlotnik H.

( 1995b) Migration and the family: The female perspective. Asian Pacific Migration Journal4: 253-271.

Explaining the labour performance of immigrant women in Spain: The interplay between family,migration and legal trajectories

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References