Women immigrating to the United States from the Former Soviet Union (FSU) were expected to incorporate seamlessly into the US labor force because of their strong educational and professional backgrounds. Using 2000 Census data, we find that FSU women were less successful than both FSU men and other non-Hispanic white female immigrants. After controlling for other factors, FSU women were more likely to rely on public assistance and less likely to be employed. If employed, they worked in less prestigious occupations and earned much less.These findings draw attention to the particular difficulties of incorporation of this wave of relatively advantaged immigrants.
Baker M. and Benjamin D. ( 1997) The role of the family in immigrants’ labor-market activity: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review87(4): 705-727.
2.
Chiswick BR ( 1978) The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. The Journal of Political Economy86(5): 897-921.
3.
Chiswick BR ( 1993) Soviet Jews in the United States: An analysis of their linguistic and economic adjustment. International Migration Review27(2): 260-285.
4.
Cohen PN and Bianchi SM ( 1999) Marriage, children, and women’s employment: What do we know?Monthly Labor Review122(12): 22-31.
5.
Cohen Y. and Haberfeld Y. ( 2007) Self-selection and earning assimilation: Immigrants from the Former Soviet Union in Israel and the United States. Demography44(3): 649-668.
6.
Cohen Y. and Kogan I. ( 2007) Next year in Jerusalem . . . or in Cologne? Labor market integration of Jewish immigrants from the Former Soviet Union in Israel and Germany in the 1990s. European Sociological Review23(2): 155-168.
7.
Duleep H. Orcutt and Sanders S. ( 1993) The decision to work by married immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review46(4): 677-690.
8.
Fix M., Passel JS and Sucher K. ( 2003) Immigrant Families and Workers: Trends in Naturalization . Washington, DC: The Urban Institute .
9.
Gold SJ ( 2003) Israeli and Russian Jews: Gendered perspectives on settlement and return migration. In: Hondagneu-Sotelo P (ed.) Gender and U.S. Immigration: Contemporary Trends . Berkeley: University of California Press, 127-147.
10.
Gorodzeisky A. and Semyonov M. (forthcoming) Two dimensions to immigrants’ economic incorporation: Soviet immigrants in the Israeli labour market. Journal of Migration and Ethnic Studies.
11.
Greenlees CS and Saenz R. ( 1999) Determinants of employment among newly arrived Mexican wives. International Migration Review33(2): 354-377.
12.
Heitman S. ( 1991) Soviet emigration in 1990: A new ‘fourth wave’? In: Basok T and Brym RJ (eds) Soviet-Jewish Emigration and Resettlement in the 1990s. Toronto, Ontario: York Lanes Press, 1-16.
13.
Howe M. ( 1989) Soviet Jewish émigrés allocated around U.SThe New York Times, 16 September.
14.
Kaufman G. and Uhlenberg P. ( 2000) The influence of parenthood on work effort of married men and women. Social Forces78: 931-949.
15.
Khotkina Z. ( 1994) Women in the labour market: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow . In: Posadskaya A (ed.) Women in Russia: A New Era in Russian Feminism. New York : Verso, 85-108.
16.
Lewin-Epstein N., Semyonov M., Kogan I. and Wanner R. ( 2003) Institutional structure and immigrant integration: A comparative study of immigrants’ labor market attainment in Canada and Israel. International Migration Review37(2): 389-420.
17.
Logan JR, Alba RD and Stults BJ ( 2003) Enclaves and entrepreneurs: Assessing the payoff for immigrants and minorities. International Migration Review37: 344-388.
18.
Maume DJ, Jr ( 1999) Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations26: 483-509.
19.
Orleck A. ( 1999) The Soviet Jewish Americans. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
20.
Padavic I. and Reskin B. ( 2002) Women and Men at Work, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press .
21.
Passel JS and Clark RL ( 1998) Immigrants in New York: Their Legal Status, Incomes and Taxes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
22.
Pedraza S. ( 1991) Women and migration: The social consequences of gender . Annual Review of Sociology17: 303-325.
23.
Petersen T. and Morgan LA ( 1995) Separate and unequal: Occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. American Journal of Sociology101(2): 329-365.
24.
Read Ghazal and Cohen PN ( 2007) One size fits all? Explaining U.S.-born and immigrant women’s employment across 12 ethnic groups. Social Forces85(4): 1713-1734.
25.
Remennick LI ( 1999) Women of the ‘Sandwich’ generation and multiple roles: The case of Russian immigrants of the 1990s in Israel. Sex Roles40(5/6): 347-378.
26.
Remennick LI ( 2007) ‘Being a woman is different here’: Changing perceptions of femininity and gender relations among Former Soviet women living in Greater Boston. Women’s Studies International Forum30: 326-341.
27.
Ruggles S., Sobek M., Alexander T., Fitch CA, Goeken R., Hall P., Kelly P., King M. and Ronnander C. ( 2004) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 3.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center (producer and distributor, http://usa.ipums.org/usa/).
28.
Schoeni RF ( 1998a) Labor market assimilation of immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review51(3): 483-504.
29.
Schoeni RF ( 1998b) Labor market outcomes of immigrant women in the United States: 1970 to 1990. International Migration Review32(1): 57-77.
30.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1980) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1980. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
31.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1983) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1983. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
32.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1991) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1990. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
33.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1992) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1991. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
34.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1993) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1992. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
35.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1994) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1993. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
36.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1996a) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1994. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
37.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1996b) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1995. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
38.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1997) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1996. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
39.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 1999) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1997. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
40.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 2000) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1998. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
41.
US Immigration and Naturalization Service ( 2002) Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1999. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
42.
Wilson CL ( 1995) Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do ‘Women’s Work’. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Zhou M. and Logan JR ( 1989) Returns on human capital in ethnic enclaves: New York City’s Chinatown. American Sociological Review54: 809-820.
