“Parity of Esteem”: A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Peace Processes,with a South African Case Study

Abstract

In the first part of this article a conceptual framework for assessing the durability of negotiated peace settlements is developed. The framework elaborates on approaches that hold that dealing with issues of relative group status is central to the effectiveness of negotiated settlements. The dynamics of post-settlement competition, the negotiated rules that shape such competition, and the impact of competitive outcomes on inter-group status, whether adverse or positive, is explored. It is argued that peace settlements with rules that shape competition in such a way that both parity of outcomes and parity of esteem can be achieved will be more durable. Parity of esteem is achieved to the extent that competitive rules inhibit stakeholders from drawing invidious comparisons from competitive outcomes. The second part of the article comprises a case study of South Africa. A descriptive analysis is made of a particular set of rules that emanate from the 1993/96 negotiated settlement. The competitive arena is the employment market and the rules of affirmative action. The case study centers on a ruling in a case brought to the South African Labor Court by the Solidarity Trade Union. The case illustrates the emergence of invidious comparisons, the dynamics of in-group and out-group interaction, the construction and reconstruction of identities, and the shifting equilibrium of relative group status. In conclusion, it is found that the current rules shaping this competitive situation inhibit the emergence of parity of esteem.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, William G. 1979. “Justice, Freedom and Self-Interest in Intergroup Conflict.” pp. 121–143 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel . Monterey, CA: Wadsworth .

Baumeister, Roy F. , L. Smart , and J. Boden . 1999. “Relation of Threatened Egotism to Violence and Aggression: The Dark Side of High Self-Esteem.” pp. 240–279 in The Self in Social Psychology, edited by R.F. Baumeister . Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis .

Brown, Rupert . 2000. “Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges” , European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 745–778 .

Collier, Paul , et al. 2003. Breaking the Conflict Trap. Washington, DC: World Bank .

Darby, John . 2001. The Effects of Violence on Peace Processes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press .

De Lange, Jan . 2003. “Solidariteit en SAKP span saam.” (Solidarity and SACP join forces). Sake Burger, July 18 p. S1-S1.

Du Toit, Pierre . 2001. South Africa’s Brittle Peace—the Problem of Post SettlementViolence. Basingstoke: Palgrave .

Du Toit, Pierre . 2003. “Why Post-Settlement Settlements?” Journal of Democracy 14: 104–118 .

Greenberg, Jeff , et al. 1999. “Why do People Need Self-Esteem? Converging Evidence that Self-Esteem Serves as an Anxiety-Buffering Function.” pp. 105–122 in The Self in Social Psychology, edited by Roy F. Baumeister . Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis .

10.

Government of the United Kingdom . 1998. The Agreement: Agreement reached in the multi-party negotiations. Belfast: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office .

11.

Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press .

12.

Horowitz, Donald L. 2001. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press .

13.

KotzÈ, Hennie and Pierre du Toit . 1997. “Public Opinion on Security and Democracy in South Africa after Transition: The 1995/96 World Values Survey” , Strategic Review for Southern Africa 19: 52–75 .

14.

Leuvenink, Jaco . 2003. “Solidariteit vra nuwe Regstelaksie.” (Solidarity calls for a new approach to Affirmative Action.) Sake Burger, May 15 p. S13-S13.

15.

Licklider, Roy . 1995. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993” , American Political Science Review 89: 681–690 .

16.

Mattes, Robert . 2002. “South Africa: Democracy Without the People?” , Journal ofDemocracy 13: 22–36 .

17.

Republic of South Africa. 2002. JHA Coetzer and 11 others vs The Minister of Safety andSecurity. Case No. JS 222–2002. Date of judgement: November 29.

18.

Smith, Ashley . 2003. “Call to Oust White Women as a Group to be Advanced.” CapeTimes, May 21 p. 3-3.

19.

Smyth, Leo F. 2002. “Identity-Based Conflicts: A Systemic Approach” , NegotiationJournal 18: 147–161 .

20.

Solidarity Trade Union . 2003. “Balancing Affirmative Action.” Presented at the Public Hearings on employment equity, Parliamentary Labor Portfolio Committee, May 14, Cape Town: Houses of Parliament.

21.

Solomon, Sheldon , Jeff Greenberg , and Tom Pyszczynski . 1991. “A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews.” pp. 93–159 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24, edited by Mark P. Zanna . New York: Academic Press .

22.

South African Department of Labour . 1998. Employment Equity Act. No. 55 of 1998. South Africa: Department of Labour Website at: http://www.labour.gov.za/docs/legislation/eea/index.asp.

23.

South African Institute of Race Relations . 2001. South Africa Survey 2000/2001. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations .

24.

South African Press Association . 2003a. “Business and Unions Give Department of Labor the Thumbs Up.” July 3. Press release .

25.

South African Press Association . 2003b. “Solidarity ask Minister of Labor for National Indaba.” July 4. Press release .

26.

Schlemmer, Lawrence . 2001. “Race Relations and Racism in Everyday Life” , Fast Facts 9/2001: 2–12 .

27.

Tajfel, Henry and John Turner . 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel . Monterey, CA: Wadsworth .

28.

Varshney, Ashutosh . 2003. “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and Rationality” , Perspectives on Politics 1: 85–99 .