Structural Holes and Structural Synergies: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of State-Society Relations and Development in Colonial Sierra Leone and Mauritius
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2003
Structural Holes and Structural Synergies: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of State-Society Relations and Development in Colonial Sierra Leone and Mauritius
Drawing on network theory from economic sociology, this article argues that development through state-society synergy requires the spread of information and resources between state and society. After describing key concepts and a nested methodological approach, the article analyzes how the different network structures affected the success of state decentralizing reforms in two former British colonies after World War II: Sierra Leone and Mauritius. It finds that the use of gatekeeping intermediaries in indirectly ruled Sierra Leone caused structural holes between state and society and that the reforms therefore increased the extent of decentralized despotism. Alternatively, direct colonial rule in Mauritius promoted dense ties between state and societal actors, and the colonial state reforms therefore made decentralized development possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, Arthur . 1978. Mende Politics and Government Under Colonial Rule. New York: Oxford University Press .
2.
Allen, Richard . 1999. Slaves, Freedmen, and Indentured Laborers in Colonial Mauritius. New York: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Amsden, Alice . 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Asian Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press .
4.
Bates, Robert . 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press .
5.
Bates, Robert . 1989. Beyond the Miracle of the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Bernhard, Michael , Christopher Reenock , and Timothy Nordstrom . 2002. “The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival.”Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University .
7.
Bollen, Kenneth and Robert Jackman . 1985. “Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income.”American Sociological Review50(4): 438-457 .
8.
Bouloux, L.1959. “The Role of the Civil Commissioners in Mauritius.”Journal of African Administration11(3): 118-123 .
9.
British Colonial Office . 1943. “Brief for Sir Cosmo Parkinson.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 167/921/5 .
10.
Burrenchobay, M.1956. Cooperatives in Mauritius. Port Louis: Mauritius Printers .
11.
Burt, Ronald . 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
12.
Bushe, H. G.1932. “Report by Mr. H.G. Bushe on his Tour in West Africa.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/90/13 .
13.
Cartwright, John . 1970. Politics in Sierra Leone, 1947-67. Toronto: Toronto University Press .
14.
Clapham, Christopher . 1982. “The Politics of Failure: Clientelism, Political Instability and National Integration in Liberia and Sierra Leone.” In Private Patronage and Public Power, edited by Christopher Clapham . New York: St. Martin’s Press .
15.
Colony of Mauritius . 1901. Blue Book of the Colony. Port Louis: Government Printers .
16.
Colony of Mauritius . 1912. Blue Book of the Colony. Port Louis: Government Printers .
17.
Colony of Mauritius . 1913. Mauritius Almanac. Port Louis: Government Printers .
18.
Colony of Mauritius . 1921. Blue Book of the Colony of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
19.
Colony of Mauritius . 1948. Blue Book of the Colony of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
20.
Colony of Mauritius . 1954. Annual Report of the Education Department. Port Louis: Government Printers .
21.
Colony of Mauritius . 1955. Annual Report of the Social Welfare Department. Port Louis: Government Printers .
22.
Colony of Mauritius . 1959. Yearbook of Statistics. Port Louis: Government Printers .
23.
Colony of Mauritius . 1961-1968. Colony Report of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
24.
Colony of Mauritius . 1964. Annual Report of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security. Port Louis: Government Printers .
25.
Colony of Mauritius . 1965. Annual Report of the Ministry of Labour. Port Louis: Government Printers .
26.
Colony of Mauritius . 1966. Colony Report of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
27.
Colony of Mauritius . 1967a. Colony Report of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
28.
Colony of Mauritius . 1967b. Staff List July 1967. Port Louis: Government Printers .
29.
Colony of Mauritius . 1968a. Annual Report of the Ministry of Labour. Port Louis: Government Printers .
30.
Colony of Mauritius . 1968b. Annual Report of the Registry of Associations 1968. Port Louis: Government Printers .
31.
Cook, Karen , Richard Emerson , and Mary Gillmore . 1983. “The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results.”American Journal of Sociology89: 275-305 .
32.
Davis, Mike . 2001. Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World. New York: Verso .
33.
Dorjahn, Vernon . 1960. “The Changing Political System of the Temne.”Africa30(2): 110-140 .
34.
Dorman, Maurice . 1957. “Letter to C.G. Eastwood, 16 February.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/1993 .
35.
Dorman, Maurice . 1960. “Letter from 8 January,”London: Public Records Office Colonial Office Collection 554/2146 .
36.
Esman, Milton and Norman Uphoff . 1984. Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Local Development. Ithica: Cornell University Press .
37.
Evans, Peter . 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
38.
Evans, Peter . 1996. “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy.”World Development24(6): 1119-1132 .
39.
Fernandez, Roberto and Roger Gould . 1994. “A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain.”American Journal of Sociology99(6): 1455-1491 .
40.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office . 1971. Colonial Development and Welfare Acts, 1929-1970. London: HMSO .
41.
Goldsworthy, David . 1971. Colonial Issues in British Politics, 1945-1961: From ‘Colonial Development’ to ‘Winds of Change.’Oxford: Clarendon Press .
42.
Gould, Roger . 1989. “Power and Social Structure in Community Elites.”Social Forces68(2): 531-552 .
43.
Gould, Roger . 1991. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.”American Sociological Review56: 716-729 .
44.
Government of Mauritius . 1969. Annual Report of the Registry of Associations 1968. Port Louis: Government Printers .
45.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1920. Sierra Leone Blue Book, 1919. Freetown: Government Printers .
46.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1947. Colonial Annual Reports: Sierra Leone. London: HMSO .
47.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1954. The Duties and Functions of the Provincial Administration under the Ministerial System. Sessional Paper No. 2 of 1954. London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection .
48.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1955a. 1955 Report on the Administration of the Provinces. Freetown: Government Printers .
49.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1955b. “Protectorate Disturbances: Sierra Leone.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/1329 .
50.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1955c. Report on the Work of the Department of Cooperation, 1955. Freetown: Government Printers .
51.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1955d. “Sierra Leone Political Intelligence Report.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/1329 .
52.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1956. Sierra Leone: Report of Commission of Inquiry into Disturbances in the Provinces (Nov. 1955 to March 1956). London: HMSO .
53.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1957-1959. Enquiry into the Conduct of Certain Chiefs, Sub-Chiefs, and Headmen in Sierra Leone: Decisions and Subsequent Action. London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/1993 .
54.
Government of Sierra Leone . 1960. “Application of Report by the Sierra Leone Intelligence Committee, May 1960.”London: Public Records Office, WAF Collection 103/37/1 .
55.
Granovetter, Mark . 1974. Getting a Job; A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
56.
Hadenius, Axel and F. Uggla . 1996. “Making Civil Society Work, Promoting Democratic Development: What Can States and Donors Do?”World Development24: 1621-1639 .
57.
Hailey, William . 1951. Native Administration in the British African Territories, Part III. London: HMSO .
58.
Hedstrom, Peter , Rickard Sandell , and Charlotta Stern . 2000. “Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.”American Journal of Sociology106: 145-172 .
59.
Heller, Patrick . 1999. The Labor of Development. Ithica: Cornell University Press .
60.
Heller, Patrick . 2001. “Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre.”Politics and Society29(1): 121-163 .
61.
Hudson, R. S.1956. “Letter from 14 May.”London: Public Records Office, Colonial Office Collection 554/1329 .
62.
Jenkins, J. Craig . 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.”Annual Review of Sociology9: 527-553 .
63.
Kilson, Martin . 1966. Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization Process in Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
64.
Lange, Matthew. 2004. “The British Colonial Lineages of Despotism and Development.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
65.
Lange, Matthew . 2003. “Embedding the Colonial State: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of State Building and Broad-Based Development in Mauritius.”Social Science History27(3): 397-423 .
66.
Lee, J. M.1967. Colonial Development and Good Government: A Study of the Ideas Expressed by the British Official Classes in Planning Decolonization, 1939-1964. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
67.
Leftwich, Adrian . 2000. States and Development. London: Polity Press .
68.
Lieberman, Evan . 2003. “Nested Analysis in Cross-National Research.”APSA-CP: The Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Assocation14(1): 17-20 .
69.
Mamdani, Mahmood . 1996. Citizen and Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
70.
Marsden, Peter . 1983. “Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power.”American Journal of Sociology88: 686-717 .
71.
Mauritius Economic Commission . 1948. Health and Welfare: Report of the Committee No. 3. Port Louis: Government Printers .
72.
Mauritius Legislative Council . 1956a. The Development of Rural Local Government in Mauritius. Sessional Paper No. 2. Port Louis: Government Printers .
73.
Mauritius Legislative Council . 1956b. Mauritius Development and Welfare Ten-Year Plan. Sessional Paper No. 5. Port Louis: Government Printers .
74.
Merton, Robert . 1987. “Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebook: Establishing the Phenomena, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research.”Annual Review of Sociology13: 1-28 .
75.
Migdal, Joel . 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
76.
Migdal, Atul Kohli , and Vivienne Shue eds. 1994. State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press .
77.
Morris, Aldon . 1981. “Black Southern Sit-In Movement: An Analysis of Internal Organization . American Sociological Review46: 744-767 .
78.
Nepal, D.1982. The Development of Local Government in Mauritius. Moka, Mauritius: Mahatma Gandhi Institute .
79.
Onis, Ziya . 1991. “The Logic of the Developmental State.”Comparative Politics24(1): 109-126 .
80.
Ostrom, Elinore . 1990. Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University .
81.
Putnam, Robert . 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University .
82.
Reno, William . 1995. Corruption and State Politics in Sierra Leone. New York: Cambridge University Press .
83.
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Peter Evans . 1985. “The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter Evans , Dietrich Rueschemeyer , and Theda Skocpol . New York: Cambridge University Press .
84.
Skocpol, Theda . 1997. “The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in American Democracy.”Social Science History21(4): 455-479 .
85.
Tendler, Judith . 1993. “Tales of Dissemination in Small-Farm Agriculture: Lessons for Institution Builders.”World Development21(10): 1567-1582 .
86.
Tendler, Judith and Sara Freedheim . 1994. “Trust in a Rent-Seeking World: Health and Government Transformed in Northeast Brazil.”World Development22(12): 1771-1791 .
87.
Titmuss, Richard . 1968. Social Policies and Population Growth in Mauritius. London: Frank Cass and Co.
88.
Uphoff, Norman . 1992. Learning from Gal Oya. Ithica: Cornell University Press .
89.
Visawasam, C.1973. Sierra Leone: Local Government in the Chiefdom. Freetown, Sierra Leone: United Nations Development Programme .
90.
Wade, Robert . 1990. Governing the Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
91.
Walter, A.1926. Final Report on the Census Enumeration made in the Colony of Mauritius. Port Louis: Government Printers .
92.
Wang, Xu.1999. “Mutual Empowerment of State and Society: Its Nature, Conditions, Mechanisms, and Limits.”Comparative Politics31(2): 231-249 .
