A brief account is given of the reason for our belief in the existence of the megalithic yard. The statistical background is explained.
It is shown that megalithic surveyors could attain an accuracy equal to that given by modern methods. The lecture includes a brief account of megalithic astronomy and its possible motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BroadbentS. R., ‘Quantum hypothesis’Biometrika, 42, 45–57 (1955); ‘Examination of a quantum hypothesis based on a single set of data', Biometrika, 43, 32–44 (1956).
2.
KendallD. G. Statistical Lab, University of Cambridge. ‘Hunting quanta’, Phil Trans R Soc Lond, A276, 231–266 (1974).
3.
FreemanP. R. University College, London. ‘Thom's survey of the Avebury Ring’, Jnl Hist A stron, viii, 134–136 (1977).
4.
PiggottS. See Who's Who.
5.
Ménec‘The Carnac Alignments’ by A. Thom and A. S. Thom, Jnl Hist Astron, iii, 11–26 (1972).
6.
Broadbent's ‘A’ Method. Refer to the first of Broadbent's papers.
7.
PatrickDr‘On the interpretation of the Carnac Menhirs and Alignments’ by A. and A. S. Thom, Irish Arch Research Forum, Vol I, Pt 2, Dec 1974.
8.
The Kermario alignments are in Carnac, Brittany and are described in ‘The Kermario Alignments’ by ThomA.ThomA. S., Jnl Hist Astron, v, 30–47 (1974).
9.
Brogar‘A Megalithic Lunar Observatory in Orkney. The Ring of Brogar and its Cairns’ by A. Thom and A. S. Thom, Jnl Hist Astron, iv, 111–123 (1973).
10.
BurlA.‘The Stone Circles of the British Isles’, Yale University Press; MacKie, Euan W. ‘Science and Society in Prehistoric Britain', Paul Elek, London.
11.
ThomA.‘Megalithic sites in Britain’, Oxford Univ Press, 1967.
