Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The reasons for requiring an accurate prediction of control system performance under actual operating conditions are discussed. It is shown that a measure of the integral square error in response to a stationary time series disturbance meets most requirements.

The analytical approach to calculating integral square error is described and a specific example is given.

Apparatus for generating the disturbance signal and measuring the integral square error is described. It is suitable for use with systems having a dominant time constant between one second and several hours. Experimental results for a pressure control system are compared with the theoretically predicted results.

The disturbance generator can also be used for generating pseudo-random binary sequences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gibson et al. In: Adaptive Control Systems. Levenstein. 1963.

Oldenbourg

Satorius

The Dynamics of Automatic Control. Chap. 111-B-3, Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs., N.Y. 1948.

Lanning

Battin

R. H.

Random Processes in Automatic Control. McGraw-Hill. 1956.

Graham

Lanthrop

R. C.

Standard Forms and Criteria: The Synthesis of Optimum Transient Response. A.I.E.E. Trans. Vol. 72 pt. 11, pp. 273–285, Nov. 1953.

Graham

Lanthrop

R. C.

The Transient Performance of Servomechanisms with Derivative and Integral Control. Trans. AIEE Vol. 73 March 1954, pp 10–17.

Graham

Lanthrop

R. C.

The Influence of Time Scale and Gain on Criteria for Servomechanism Performance. Trans. AIEE, July 1958, pp 153–158.

Hall

A. C.

The Analysis and synthesis of Linear Servomechanisms. The Technology Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 1943.

Newton, Gould and Kaiser. Analytical Design of Linear Feedback Controls. J. Wiley, 1957.

Clark

R. N.

Integral of the Error Squared as a Performance Index for Automatic Control Systems. Trans. AIEE Appl. and Ind. 1960, p 467.

10.

Douce

J. L.

An Introduction to the Mathematics of Servomechanisms. English Universities Press, London 1963.

11.

Coales

J. F.

Random inputs and load variations. Trans. S.I.T. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp 1–19, March 1961.

12.

James

H. M.

Nichols

N. B.

Phillips

R. S.

Theory of Servomechanisms. McGraw-Hill, 1947.

13.

Epton

J. B.

Gough

N. E.

Evaluation of the ISE. Definite Integral. The Chemical Engineer, No. 211, Sept. 1967.

14.

Jackson

The Calculation of Process Controllability. Trans. S.I.T. Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 68, June 1958.

15.

Dadachanji

F. M.

The Relative Performance of Electronic and Pneumatic Controllers. M.Sc. Thesis University of Bradford, School of Control 1967.

16.

Al-Shaikh

Soliman J.

A Dead-Time Simulator. Trans. S.I.T. p. 33, March 1965.

17.

Martin

E. N.

A control system comparator using the error squared criterion. Process Control and Automation. Vol. 13, pp 27–32. Feb. 1966.

18.

Bell

D. A.

The Recovery of Information from Noisy Measurements. Trans. of the Soc. of Instrum. Technol. June 1966. pp 89–102.

19.

Blackman and Turkey, Measurement of Power Spectra. Dover Publications 1959.

20.

Lion

S. D.

Davis

H. L.

A Square law circuit. Electronics, Vol. 28 No. 9, p. 192, Sept. 1955.

21.

Briggs

P. A. N.

Hammond

P. H.

Hughes

M. T. G.

Plumb

G. O.

Correlation Analysis of Process Dynamics Using Pseudo-Random Binary test perturbations. Proc. I. Mech. E. 1965, Vol. 179, parts 3H p. 37.

Equipment for Quantitative Assessment of Control System Performance Using Pseudo-Random Binary Signals

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References