Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2005-10
A Socio-Technical Systems Analysis of Increasing Operational Efficiency: Why Human Factors Solutions Developed without Reference to the Wider Context May Not Work
BainbridgeL. (1987). ‘Ironies of automation’. In, RasmussenJ.DuncanK.LeplatJ. (Eds.), New Technology and Human Error, Wiley, Chichester. pp.271–283.
2.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group (2000). Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: Worldwide Operations 1959–1999. Seattle WA: Boeing. Code of Federal Regulations (2003). Title 14: Aeronautics and Space. Washington DC: National Archives and Records Administration. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/nara/cfr.
3.
DekkerS.W.A. (2004). ‘On the other side of promise: What should we automate today?’ In, HarrisD. (Ed.) Human Factors for Flight Deck Design, Ashgate, Aldershot. pp 183–198.
4.
DekkerS.W.A.HollnagelE., (Eds.) (1999). Coping with computers in the cockpit. Ashgate, Aldershot.
5.
Eurocontrol (2002). ‘Medium and Sustainable Growth in Air Transport’. EEC Note 11/02 (Version 1) Project PFE-F-CG (September 2002). Eurocontrol Experimental Centre: Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
6.
HarrisD. (2003). The Human Factors of Fully Automatic Flight. Measurement and Control, 36(6), pp.184–187.
7.
HarrisD.HarrisF.J. (2004). ‘Predicting the successful transfer of technology between application areas; a critical evaluation of the human component in the system’. Technology in Society, Vol. 26, pp. 551–565.
8.
HarrisD.ThomasL.J. (2005). ‘The contribution of industrial and organizational psychology to safety in commercial aircraft’. In, HodgkinsonG.FordK. (Eds). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2005, John Wiley, London. pp. 177–219.
9.
JohnsonN. H.CantonR.BattisteV.JohnsonW. (2005). Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management En-route Free Maneuvering Rules of the Road: Requirements and Implementation for a Simulation of En-route Self-Separation. 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology April 18–21, 2005, Oklahoma City, OK. Ohio State University Press: Columbus OH.
10.
JohnsonW.W.BattisteV.HollandS. (1999). ‘A cockpit display designed to enable limited flight deck separation responsibility’. Proceedings of the 1999 SAE/AIAA World Aviation Congress. Society of Automotive Engineers/American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics: Anaheim, CA.
11.
JohnsonW.W.BattisteV.DelzellS.HollandS.BelcherS.JordanK. (1997). ‘Development and Demonstration of a Prototype Free Flight Cockpit Display of Traffic Information’. Proceedings of the 1997 SAE/AIAA World Aviation Congress. Society of Automotive Engineers/American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics: Anaheim, CA.
12.
JohnsonW.W.BilimoriaK.D.ThomasL.C.LeeH.Q.BattisteV. (2003). Comparison of Pilot and Automation Generated Conflict Resolutions. (AIAA Paper 2003–5400). AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 11–14 August, 2003, Austin, Texas.
13.
Joint Aviation Authorities (2000). Joint Airworthiness Requirement — Operations (JAR-OPS). Hoofdorp; JAA. Schulte, A. & Stütz, P. (2001). ‘Cognitive concepts in mission management for air-to-ground attack aircraft'. In, HarrisD. (Ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Volume 5), Ashgate, Aldershot. pp. 23–30.
14.
StützP.SchulteA. (2001). ‘Evaluation of the Cockpit Assistant Military Aircraft (CAMA) in flight trials’. In, HarrisD. (Ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Volume 5), Ashgate, Aldershot. pp. 15–22.
15.
WienerEL (1989). Human factors of advanced technology ('glass cockpit') transport aircraft (NASA contactor report No. 177528). Moffett Field, CA NASAAmes Research Center.