PrendergastTJ, LuceJM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1997;155(1):15–20.
3.
KeenanSP, BuscheKD, ChenLM, McCarthyL, InmanKJ, SibbaldWJ. A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med1997;25(8):1324–1331.
4.
LuceJM. Withholding and withdrawal of life support: ethical, legal, and clinical aspects. New Horiz1997;5(1):30–37.
5.
JonsenA.The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
6.
QuillTE, DresserR, BrockDW. The rule of double effect-a critique of its role in end-of-life decision-making. N Engl J Med1997;337(24): 1768–1771.
7.
Eichner v Dillon, 426N.Y.S. 2d517, 542-43 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
8.
Superintendent of Belchertown State School v Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728, 370 Ν.Ε. 2d417 (Mass 1977)
9.
BuchananAE, BrockDW. Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990: 422.
10.
TenoJM, LynnJ, PhillipsRS, MurphyD, YoungnerSJ, BellamyP, ConnorsAFJr. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients?J Clin Ethics1994;5:23–30.
11.
TonelliMR. Pulling the plug on living wills: a critical analysis of advance directives. Chest1996;110(3):816–822.
12.
EmanuelLL, DanisM, PearlmanRA, SingerPA. Advance care planning as a process: structuring the discussions in practice. J Am Geriatr Soc1995;43(4):440–446.
13.
TenoJM, NelsonHL, LynnJ.Advance care planning: priorities for ethical and empirical research. Hastings Cent Rep1994;24(6):S32–S36.
14.
SuhlJ, SimonsP, ReedyT, GarrickT.Myth of substituted judge-ment: surrogate decision-making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med1994;154(10):90–96.
15.
SecklerAB, MeierDE, MulvihillM, ParisBE. Substituted judge-ment: how accurate are proxy predictions?Ann Intern Med1991;115(2):92–98.
16.
HareJ, PrattC, NelsonC.Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Arch Intern Med1992;152(5):1049–1054.
17.
TonelliMR. Substituted judgment in medical practice: evidentiary standards on a sliding-scale. J Law Med Ethics1997;25:22–29.
18.
PrendergastTJ. Resolving conflicts surrounding end-of-life care. New Horiz1997;5(1):62–71.
19.
SchneidermanLJ, JeckerNS, JonsenAR. Medical futility: its mean-ing and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med1990;112(12):949–954.
20.
American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Int Med1991;115:478–485.
21.
TruogRD, BrettAS, FraderJ.The problem with futility. N Engl J Med1992;326(23):1560–1564.