Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the success of a respiratory care assessment-treatment pilot study on the orthopedic floor of our hospital, the Executive Committee of the medical staff approved expansion hospitalwide. EXPANSION TECHNIQUE: Each nursing unit was included in the project in a systematic fashion after group and individual communication had occurred. Patient assessment training sessions were conducted for the respiratory staff to allow for 24-hour coverage of all nursing units. EVALUATION METHODS: The evaluation period extended from October 1993 through October 1995. Daily monitoring activities tracked general data elements on all patients. A series of retrospective audits were conducted on a subset of patients to track a more detailed set of data points. The utilization and costs of respiratory services provided to patients in 20 selected DRGs were compared between a preprotocol period (April, May, and June 1993) and the same 3-month period in 1995. EVALUATION RESULTS: During the 2-year evaluation, daily monitoring revealed that 4,420 patients were assessed and treated by respiratory care practitioners (RCPs), which included 11,050 initial and follow-up evaluations. Retrospective audits on 595 of those patients indicated that participation in the protocol process increased significantly from 66% to 78% (p = 0.004). Of the patients on protocols, 81-88% were being tapered, placed on treat-as-needed status (ie, prn), discontinued, or readjusted to their home regimen prior to discharge. Physicians accepted the RCPs’ treatment plan 90-97% of the time without intervening. Treatment volume decreased, resulting in identified cost savings of $15,337 over a 3-month evaluation period (annualized savings, $61,348). CONCLUSIONS: The positive results of a respiratory patient assessment-treatment pilot project were successfully duplicated when the process was expanded hospitalwide. RCPs in our hospital were able to demonstrate value by implementing care plans that resulted in cost savings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
