Applying a multi-level wage regression model to a matched employer-employee data set for the years 1983 and 1992, the author investigates whether changes in company wage policies can account for the sharp rise in labor market inequality in Portugal. The results suggest that traditional wage progression mechanisms based on seniority lost influence between the two years, whereas general skills became more valued by employers. Changes in the returns to tenure at the micro level thus had an equalizing impact on the distribution, but sharply increased returns to education, as well as a rising wage disadvantage for women relative to men, increased overall inequality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohn M.KramarzFrancisMargolisDavid N., 1999. “High-Wage Workers and High-Wage Firms.”Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 251–333.
2.
ApertaAnabelaMoreiraIsauraMurteiraMaria Manuela. 1994. Análise das Diferenciações entre Remunerações Convencionais e Efectivas. Colecção Estudos, Série Rendimentos, 7. Lisboa: MESS (Ministério do Emprego e da Segurança Social).
3.
BermanEliBoundJohnGrilichesZvi. 1994. “Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 367–97.
4.
BingleyPaulWestergård-NielsenNiels. 1996. “Worker and Plant Wages: Estimates from a Multi-Level Model.”Annual Conference of the European Association of Labor Economists, Crete, September.
5.
BlanchardOlivierJimenoJuan F., 1995. “Structural Unemployment: Spain versus Portugal.”American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 212–18.
6.
BlauFrancine D.1998. “Trends in the Weil-Being of American Women, 1970–1995.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 112–65.
7.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 1995. “The Gender Earnings Gap: Some International Evidence.” In FreemanRichardKatzLawrence F., eds., Differences and Changes in Wage Structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105–43.
8.
BoundJohnJohnsonGeorge. 1992. “Changes in the Structure of Wages: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.”American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 371–92.
9.
CardosoAna Rute. 1997a. “Wage Differentials across Firms: How Multilevel Modeling Reveals So Much More.”Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics, University of Essex, Colchester, June 18–21.
10.
CardosoAna Rute. 1997b. “Workers or Employers: Who Is Shaping Wage Inequality?”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 523–47.
11.
CardosoAna Rute. 1998. “Earnings Inequality in Portugal: High and Rising?”Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 325–43.
12.
DavisSteve J.HaltiwangerJohn. 1991. “Wage Dispersion between and within U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963–86.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity—Microeconomics, pp. 115–200.
13.
DavisSteven J.HaltiwangerJohn. 1996. “Employer Size and the Wage Structure in U.S. Manufacturing.”Annales d'Economie et Statistique, PP. 323–67.
14.
DempsterA. P.RubinD. B.TsutakawaR. K., 1981. “Estimation in Covariance Components Models.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 76, No. 374, pp. 341–53.
15.
EntorfHorstKramarzFrancis. 1997. “Does Unmeasured Ability Explain the Higher Wages of New Technology Workers?”European Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1489–1509.
16.
GoldsteinH.1986. “Multilevel Mixed Linear Model Analysis Using Iterative Generalized Least Squares.”Biometrika, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 43–56.
17.
GoldsteinHarvey. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Edward Arnold.
18.
GroshenErica Lynn. 1986. “Sources of Wage Dispersion: How Much Do Employers Matter?” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University. Available from University Microfilms International, Ann Harbor, Mich.
19.
HaitovskyYoel. 1986. “The Linear Hierarchical Model and Its Applications in Econometric Analysis.” In GoelPrem K.ZellnerArnold, eds., Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques: Essays in Honor of Bruno de Finetti. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 119–38.
20.
JennrichRobert I.SchluchterMark D., 1986. “Unbalanced Repeated-Measures Models with Structured Covariance Matrices.”Biometrics, Vol. 42, pp. 805–20.
21.
JohnsonGeorge E.1997. “Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Role of Demand Shifts.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 41–54.
22.
KahnLawrence M.1998. “Against the Wind: Bargaining Recentralisation and Wage Inequality in Norway, 1987–91.”Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 448, pp. 603–45.
23.
KatzLawrence F.MurphyKevin M., 1992. “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963–1987: Supply and Demand Factors.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 35–78.
24.
KramarzF.LollivierS.PeleL. P., 1995. “Wage Inequalities and Firm-Specific Compensation Policies in France.” Document de travail du CREST 9518. Paris: INSEE-CREST (Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques—Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique).
25.
KruegerAlan B.1993. “How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984–1989.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 33–60.
26.
LevyFrankMurnaneRichard J., 1992. “U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 1333–81.
27.
LindleyD. V.SmithA. F. M., 1972. “Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1–18.
28.
LongfordNicholas T.1987. “A Fast Scoring Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Unbalanced Mixed Models with Nested Random Effects.”Biometrika, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 817–27.
29.
MasonWilliam M.WongGeorge Y.EntwisleBarbara. 1983. “Contextual Analysis through the Multilevel Linear Model.” In LeinhardtS., ed., Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 72–103.
30.
ModestoLeonorMonteiroManuel Leite. 1993. “Wages, Productivity, and Efficiency: An Empirical Study for the Portuguese Manufacturing Sector.”Economia, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–25.
31.
ModestoLeonorMonteiroManuel Leitedas NevesJoão César. 1992. “Some Aspects of the Portuguese Labor Market, 1977–1988: Neutrality, Hysteresis, and the Wage Gap.” in do AmaralJoão FerreiraLucenaDiogoMelloAntónio S., eds., The Portuguese Economy Towards 1992. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 153–73.
32.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1992. OECD Economic Surveys, Portugal 1991/92. Paris: OECD.
33.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1993. “Earnings Inequality: Changes in the 1980s.” In Employment Outlook, July 1993. Paris: OECD, pp. 157–84.
34.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1994. OECD Economic Surveys, Portugal 1994. Paris: OECD.
35.
PintoMario. 1990. Les Rélations Industrielles au Portugal. Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communautés Européennes.
36.
Portugal, Ministério do Emprego e da Segurança Social. Departamento de Estatística. 1983, 1986, 1989, 1992. Quadros de Pessoal. Data in magnetic medium.
37.
RaudenbushStephenBrykAnthony. 1986. “A Hierarchical Model for Studying School Effects.”Sociology of Education, Vol. 59, pp. 1–17.
38.
RodriguesMaria JoãoLopesHelena. 1993. “La Place de l'Entreprise dans le Processus de Production de la Qualification: Effects Formateurs de l'Organisation du Travail.” Lisboa: Dinâmia-Iscte (Centro de Estudos Sobre a Mudança Socioeconómica—Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa).
