The authors examine the consequences of workplace discipline practices involving the use of last chance agreements (LCAs)—contracts governing the non-arbitral reinstatement of discharged employees. Using data from one manufacturing firm's 15-year experience with LCAs, they explore the impact of LCA-based employee reinstatement on subsequent years' discharge rates. They also seek to identify individual and work-related factors predictive of individual reinstatement “success.” Consistent with moral hazard theory, the analysis shows evidence of a positive relationship between the number of LCAs signed in one year and the rate of discharge in subsequent years; and consistent with the theory of reintegrative shaming, LCAs appear to be most effective among those most susceptible to shaming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArveyRichard D.IvancevichJohn M., 1980. “Punishment in Organizations: A Review, Propositions, and Research Suggestions.”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 123–32.
2.
BanduraAlbert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BeyerJanice M.TriceHarrison M., 1984. “A Field Study of the Use and Perceived Effects of Discipline in Controlling Work Performance.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 743–64.
4.
BraithwaiteJohn. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BraithwaiteJohnMakkaiToni. 1991. “Testing and Expected Utility Model of Corporate Deterrence.”Law and Society Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 7–40.
6.
BraithwaiteJohnMakkaiToni. 1994. “Reintegrative Shaming and Compliance with Regulatory Standards.”Criminology, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 361–83.
7.
CoxD.R.1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B., Vol. 34, pp. 187–202.
8.
DenisMarty. 1989. “Alcoholics and Drug Abusers—How Many Second Chances Are They Owed?”Employment Relations Today, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 211–18.
9.
DyckF. J., 1977. “Effect of Surveillance on the Number of Hysterectomies in the Province of Saskatchewan.”New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 296, pp. 1326–28.
10.
EriksonKai T.1962. “Notes on the Sociology of Deviance.”Social Problems, Vol. 9, pp. 307–14.
11.
FishbeinMartinAzjenIcek. 1985. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
12.
GrasmickH. G.BursakRobert J.ArneklevBruce J., 1993. “Reduction in Drunk Driving as a Response to Threats of Shame, Embarrassment, and Legal Sanctions.”Criminology, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 41–67.
13.
GreenSamuel B.1991. “How Many Subjects Does It Take to Do a Regression Analysis?”Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 499–510.
14.
GrinsteadKenneth. 1993. “The Arbitration of Last Chance Agreements.”Arbitration Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 71–78.
15.
GrubelHerbert G.WalkerMichael A., 1978. Unemployment Insurance: Global Evidence of Its Effects on Unemployment. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
16.
HartwellTyler D., 1996. “Aiding Troubled Employees: The Prevalence, Cost, and Characteristics of Employee Assistance Programs in the United States.”American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp. 804–8.
17.
HillCharlotte M.1989. “The Arbitrator's Response to Dismissal of Alcoholic Employees: Do Violations of the ‘Last Chance’ Agreement Constitute ‘Just Cause’ for Dismissal?”Detroit College of Law Review, Vol. 3, pp. 1213–33.
18.
HoutsSandra S.1995. “Explaining Alcoholism Treatment Efficacy with the Theory of Reintegrative Shaming.”Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 25–38.
19.
JonesDallas L.1961. “Arbitration and Industrial Discipline. Report No. 14.”Ann Arbor: Bureau of Industrial Relations, University of Michigan.
20.
KatzArnoldHightJoseph E., 1977. “The Economics of Unemployment Insurance: A Symposium. Overview.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 30, No. 4 (July), pp. 431–37.
21.
KeatonBarbaraYamataniHide. 1993. “Benefits of Mandatory EAP Participation: A Study of Employees with Last Chance Contracts.”Employee Assistance Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 67–77.
22.
LabigChalmerHelburnI. B.RodgersRobert C., 1985. “Discipline History, Seniority, and Reason for Discharge as Predictors of Post-Reinstatement Job Performance.”Arbitration Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 44–51.
23.
LewinDavidPetersonRichard B., 1988. The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States. New York: Quorum.
24.
McDermottThomas J.NewhamsThomas H., 1971. “Discharge-Reinstatement: What Happens Thereafter.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 24, No. 4 (July), pp. 526–40.
25.
McLainDavid L.1995. “Response to Health and Safety Risk in the Work Environment.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1726–43.
26.
MertonRobert K.1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
O'ReillyCharles A.PufferSheila M., 1989. “The Impact of Rewards and Punishments in a Social Context: A Laboratory and Field Experiment.”Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 41–53.
29.
O'ReillyCharles A.WeitzB. A., 1980. “Managing Marginal Employees: The Use of Warnings and Dismissals.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp. 467–84.
30.
ShermanLawrence W.SchmidtJanet D.RoganDennis P., 1992. Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
31.
SnowCarltonPringleJanine C., 1991. “Should Arbitrators Have the Last Word on ‘Last Chance’ Settlement Agreements?”Willamette Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 513–47.
32.
SomersGerald G.1975. “Alcohol and Just Cause for Discharge. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators.”Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
