Using 1970, 1980, and 1990 U.S. census data, the author examines the life-cycle patterns of immigrant women's labor force participation. He finds that the cross-sectional approach that has been used in all previous studies leads to a substantial over-estimate of the degree to which immigrant women's assimilation increases their labor force participation. The effect of assimilation found by using the cohort approach, however (which acknowledges the possibility that patterns of labor force participation partly reflect the year of immigration), is still sizable. The effect is concentrated within the first 10 years after arrival. There are substantial differences in participation and assimilation by country of birth. Immigrants from Japan, Korea, and China are found to have experienced the greatest degree of assimilation, with an effect that raises the probability of working by 20 percentage points during the first 10 years after arriving in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedBashir, and RobinsonJ. Gregory. 1994. “Estimates of Emigration of the Foreign-born Population: 1980–1990.” Population Estimates and Projections Technical Working Paper #9, Population Division, Bureau of the Census, December.
2.
BakerMichael, and BenjaminDwayne. 1994. “The Performance of Immigrants in the Canadian Labor Market.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 369–405.
3.
BakerMichael, and BenjaminDwayne. 1997. “The Role of the Family in Immigrants' Labor Market Activity: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.”American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 705–27.
4.
Ben-PorathYoram. 1973. “Labor Force Participation Rates and the Supply of Labor.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 697–704.
5.
BorjasGeorge J.1985. “Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 463–89.
6.
BorjasGeorge J.1987. “Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.”American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 531–53.
7.
BorjasGeorge J.1989. “Immigrant and Emigrant Earnings: A Longitudinal Study.”Economic Inquiry, Vol. 27 (January), pp. 21–37.
8.
BorjasGeorge J.1993. “Immigration Policy, National Origin, and Immigrant Skills: A Comparison of Canada and the United States.” In CardDavid and FreemanRichard B., eds., Small Differences That Matter: Labor Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–43.
9.
BorjasGeorge J.1994. “The Economics of Immigration.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1667–1717.
10.
BorjasGeorge J.1995. “Assimilation and Changes in Cohort Quality Revisited: What Happened to Immigrant Earnings in the 1980s?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 201–45.
11.
BorjasGeorge J.1996. “The Earnings of Mexican Immigrants in the United States.”Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 69–98.
12.
BorjasGeorge J., and BratsbergBernt. 1996. “Who Leaves? The Outmigration of the Foreign-born.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 165–76.
13.
ChiswickBarry R.1978. “The Effect of Assimilation on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 5, pp. 897–921.
14.
ChiswickBarry R.1980. An Analysis of the Economic Progress and Impact of Immigrants. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service PB80–200454.
15.
Cobb-ClarkDeborah A.1993. “Immigrant Selectivity and Wages: The Evidence for Women.”American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 986–92.
16.
DuleepHarriet Orcutt, and SandersSeth. 1993. “The Decision to Work by Married Immigrant Women.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 67–80.
17.
FriedbergRachel M.1991. “The Labor Market Assimilation of Immigrants in the United States: The Role of Age at Arrival.” Unpublished paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, December.
18.
FunkhauserEdward, and TrejoSteve. 1997. “Female Immigrants in the United States.” Unpublished paper, University of California, Santa Barbara, February.
19.
GreenwoodMichael J., and McDowellJohn M.. 1990. “The Labor Market Consequences of U.S. Immigration: A Survey.”Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs.
20.
GronauReuben. 1973a. “The Effect of Children on the Housewife's Value of Time.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 168–99.
21.
GronauReuben. 1973b. “The Intrafamily Allocation of Time: The Value of the Housewife's Time.”American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 634–51.
22.
KossoudjiSherrie A.1988. “Immigrant Worker Assimilation: Is It a Labor Market Phenomenon?”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 494–527.
23.
LaLondeRobert J., and TopelRobert H.. 1992. “The Assimilation of Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market.” In BorjasGeorge J. and FreemanRichard B., eds., Immigration and the Work Force. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LamDavid, and SchoeniRobert F.. 1993. “Effects of Family Background on Earnings and Returns to Schooling: Evidence From Brazil.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 710–41.
25.
LongJames E.1980. “The Effect of Americanization on Earnings: Some Evidence for Women.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 620–29.
26.
MacPhersonDavid A., and StewartJames A.. 1989. “The Labor Force Participation and Earnings Profiles of Married Female Immigrants.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 57–72.
27.
McManusWalterGouldWilliam, and WelchFinis. 1983. “Earnings of Hispanic Men: The Role of English Language Proficiency.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 101–30.
28.
MrozThomas A.1987. “The Sensitivity of an Empirical Model of Married Women's Hours of Work to Economic and Statistical Assumptions.”Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 765–99.
29.
ParkJin Heum. 1994. “Changes in U.S. School Quality: What Do We Learn From Immigrants?” Unpublished paper, Princeton University.
30.
PencavelJohn. 1992. “Labor Supply of Men: A Survey.” In AshenfelterOrley and LayardRichard, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
31.
ReimersCordelia W.1985. “Cultural Differences in Labor Force Participation Among Married Women.”American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 251–55.
32.
SmithJames P.1992. “Hispanics and the American Dream: An Analysis of Hispanics' Male Labor Market Wages, 1940–1980.” Unpublished paper, RAND.
